Evaluating the Shear Strength of Subbase-subgrade Interface Using Large Scale Direct Shear Test

Qais Sahib Banyhussan, Ahmed Mancy Mosa, Abdullah Nasser Hussein, Esraa Jasim Sigar
{"title":"Evaluating the Shear Strength of Subbase-subgrade Interface Using Large Scale Direct Shear Test","authors":"Qais Sahib Banyhussan, Ahmed Mancy Mosa, Abdullah Nasser Hussein, Esraa Jasim Sigar","doi":"10.59615/ijie.3.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inclusion of geogrid in road pavements can improve pavement performance through increasing the lateral confinement, bearing capacity, and overall rigidity of the pavement, as well as reducing the vertical and lateral pavement deformations. The materials used in the present study are: subbase granular materials Type B, two types of subgrade soil; clay and sandy soil, and two nonwoven biaxial geogrids (G1 and G2) used as reinforcing materials. Direct shear testing was adopted by manufacturing a large-scale direct shear apparatus consisted of an upper, square box of size 20 cm × 20 cm × 10 cm, and a lower, rectangular box of size 200 mm × 250 mm × 100 mm is used in the present study. The results show that, for the four normal stresses equal to 25, 50, 75 and 100 kPa, the interface shear stress curves increased and followed similar trend.  For clay-subbase interface, installation of geogrid decreases the apparent cohesion of the material from 16.5 kPa (without reinforcement) to be 8 kPa and 13.5 kPa for G1 and G2, respectively. At sand-subbase interface, using geogrid leads to increase the cohesion of the material from 3.5 kPa to be 15.5 and 16 kPa for G1 and G2, respectively. The friction angle increases slightly from 30o (without reinforcement) to be 35o for G1 and G2 when the interface is subbase over clay. While, it decreased from 35.8o to be 32.1o for G1 and G2 at sand-subbase interface. The interaction coefficient for G1 and G2 increased when the normal strength increased at the clay-subbase interface. Otherwise, the behavior of interaction coefficient of the sand-subbase interface appears deferent trend, where increasing normal stress leads to decrease the interaction.","PeriodicalId":31435,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Materials","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation in Mechanical Engineering and Advanced Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59615/ijie.3.1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The inclusion of geogrid in road pavements can improve pavement performance through increasing the lateral confinement, bearing capacity, and overall rigidity of the pavement, as well as reducing the vertical and lateral pavement deformations. The materials used in the present study are: subbase granular materials Type B, two types of subgrade soil; clay and sandy soil, and two nonwoven biaxial geogrids (G1 and G2) used as reinforcing materials. Direct shear testing was adopted by manufacturing a large-scale direct shear apparatus consisted of an upper, square box of size 20 cm × 20 cm × 10 cm, and a lower, rectangular box of size 200 mm × 250 mm × 100 mm is used in the present study. The results show that, for the four normal stresses equal to 25, 50, 75 and 100 kPa, the interface shear stress curves increased and followed similar trend.  For clay-subbase interface, installation of geogrid decreases the apparent cohesion of the material from 16.5 kPa (without reinforcement) to be 8 kPa and 13.5 kPa for G1 and G2, respectively. At sand-subbase interface, using geogrid leads to increase the cohesion of the material from 3.5 kPa to be 15.5 and 16 kPa for G1 and G2, respectively. The friction angle increases slightly from 30o (without reinforcement) to be 35o for G1 and G2 when the interface is subbase over clay. While, it decreased from 35.8o to be 32.1o for G1 and G2 at sand-subbase interface. The interaction coefficient for G1 and G2 increased when the normal strength increased at the clay-subbase interface. Otherwise, the behavior of interaction coefficient of the sand-subbase interface appears deferent trend, where increasing normal stress leads to decrease the interaction.
大型直剪试验评价基-路基界面抗剪强度
在路面中加入土工格栅可以通过增加路面的侧向约束、承载能力和整体刚度来改善路面性能,并减少路面的垂直和侧向变形。本研究采用的材料有:下层粒状材料B型,两类路基土;粘土和砂土,以及两个非织造双轴土工格栅(G1和G2)作为增强材料。采用直剪试验,制作大型直剪仪,上箱体尺寸为20 cm × 20 cm × 10 cm,下箱体尺寸为200 mm × 250 mm × 100 mm。结果表明:在25、50、75和100 kPa的4种法向应力下,界面剪应力曲线呈增大趋势,且趋势相似;对于土-基界面,土工格栅的安装使材料的表观黏聚力从16.5 kPa(未加筋)降低到8 kPa和13.5 kPa (G1和G2)。在砂基界面,使用土工格栅可使材料的黏聚力从3.5 kPa提高到15.5 kPa, G2提高到16 kPa。当界面为下基覆土时,G1和G2的摩擦角由无加筋时的30°略微增大至35°。而G1和G2在砂底界面处,从35.80降低到32.10。随着土基界面法向强度的增大,G1和G2的相互作用系数增大。反之,砂基界面相互作用系数表现出不同趋势,即法向应力增大导致相互作用减小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书