Blame the War, Not the Troops: Good Kill

IF 0.5 Q3 CULTURAL STUDIES
A. Adams
{"title":"Blame the War, Not the Troops: Good Kill","authors":"A. Adams","doi":"10.1080/17526272.2022.2116187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2014 feature film Good Kill is a case study of how hegemonic popular culture can defang and absorb critiques of military discourse. Although this film articulates a limited critique of drone warfare, its major task is to normalize drone warfare in three ways. First, it presents a romanticized view of the ‘clean’ military capabilities of drone weaponry. Second, the film shows ordinary soldiers as morally good actors who are forced to execute operationally counterproductive orders by inept superiors. Finally, it emphasizes the corrosive effects of drone warfare on the protagonist’s mental wellbeing. This synthesis of tropes enables a depoliticized understanding of drone warfare, which is morally exculpatory for drones as a technology at the same time as it represents drone operators sympathetically. Good Kill demonstrates how hegemonic popular culture can articulate a limited critique of war in the course of politically legitimizing it.","PeriodicalId":42946,"journal":{"name":"Journal of War & Culture Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of War & Culture Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17526272.2022.2116187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2014 feature film Good Kill is a case study of how hegemonic popular culture can defang and absorb critiques of military discourse. Although this film articulates a limited critique of drone warfare, its major task is to normalize drone warfare in three ways. First, it presents a romanticized view of the ‘clean’ military capabilities of drone weaponry. Second, the film shows ordinary soldiers as morally good actors who are forced to execute operationally counterproductive orders by inept superiors. Finally, it emphasizes the corrosive effects of drone warfare on the protagonist’s mental wellbeing. This synthesis of tropes enables a depoliticized understanding of drone warfare, which is morally exculpatory for drones as a technology at the same time as it represents drone operators sympathetically. Good Kill demonstrates how hegemonic popular culture can articulate a limited critique of war in the course of politically legitimizing it.
怪战争,不怪军队:杀得好
2014年的故事片《绝杀》(Good Kill)是一个案例研究,展示了霸权的流行文化如何削弱和吸收对军事话语的批评。尽管这部电影对无人机战争进行了有限的批评,但它的主要任务是通过三种方式使无人机战争正常化。首先,它对无人机武器的“清洁”军事能力提出了一种浪漫化的看法。其次,影片将普通士兵描绘成道德良好的演员,他们被迫执行无能的上级下达的适得其反的命令。最后,它强调了无人机战争对主人公心理健康的腐蚀性影响。这种比喻的综合使人们能够去政治化地理解无人机战争,这在道义上为无人机作为一种技术开脱,同时也同情地代表了无人机操作员。《绝杀》展示了霸权的流行文化如何在使战争在政治上合法化的过程中表达出对战争的有限批评。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信