{"title":"“Keep up the good work, Za nas Kej!” citizens’ passive support to the local activist group","authors":"Sanja Iguman, Nevena Mijatović, Sara Nikolic","doi":"10.2298/fid2201120i","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep-rooted political turbulence, along with the present hybrid regime, have resulted in an undesirable social, economic and political milieu in Serbia. Such an atmosphere is a fertile ground for a grey economy, corruption, nepotism and restrictions to media freedoms. These ?unconventional? means of social functioning, have caused a decline in trust towards state institutions and proportionally, increase of citizen participation in non-institutional models of engagement. The aim of this paper is to analyse one such model of non-institutional engagement: the local activist group Za nas Kej, operating in the area Savski blokovi (Sava apartment blocks) in New Belgrade. The authors analysed local residents? perception of the activist group Za nas Kej in comparison to the group?s narratives and actions. By using a grounded theory approach authors explained the role of groups such as Za Nas Kej in the development of participatory and deliberative democracy within the local community. Our data indicates that Za nas kej, despite its local character, does not have a strong foothold in the community, and thus receives only passive support. Citizens perceive Za nas kej as mediator between local institutions and residents of the Sava apartment blocks. Despite the failure to mobilise a wider group of citizens for their cause, this activist group continues to be a relevant (political) actor within the local community.","PeriodicalId":41902,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy and Society-Filozofija i Drustvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/fid2201120i","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Deep-rooted political turbulence, along with the present hybrid regime, have resulted in an undesirable social, economic and political milieu in Serbia. Such an atmosphere is a fertile ground for a grey economy, corruption, nepotism and restrictions to media freedoms. These ?unconventional? means of social functioning, have caused a decline in trust towards state institutions and proportionally, increase of citizen participation in non-institutional models of engagement. The aim of this paper is to analyse one such model of non-institutional engagement: the local activist group Za nas Kej, operating in the area Savski blokovi (Sava apartment blocks) in New Belgrade. The authors analysed local residents? perception of the activist group Za nas Kej in comparison to the group?s narratives and actions. By using a grounded theory approach authors explained the role of groups such as Za Nas Kej in the development of participatory and deliberative democracy within the local community. Our data indicates that Za nas kej, despite its local character, does not have a strong foothold in the community, and thus receives only passive support. Citizens perceive Za nas kej as mediator between local institutions and residents of the Sava apartment blocks. Despite the failure to mobilise a wider group of citizens for their cause, this activist group continues to be a relevant (political) actor within the local community.
根深蒂固的政治动荡,加上目前的混合政权,在塞尔维亚造成了不受欢迎的社会、经济和政治环境。这样的氛围是滋生灰色经济、腐败、裙带关系和限制媒体自由的沃土。这些非传统的?社会运作方式导致了对国家机构信任度的下降,并按比例增加了公民参与非机构参与模式。本文的目的是分析这样一种非机构参与的模式:在新贝尔格莱德Savski blokovi (Sava公寓楼)地区运作的当地激进组织Za nas Kej。作者分析了当地居民?与该组织相比,如何看待激进组织Za nas Kej ?S叙述和行动。作者采用扎根理论的方法解释了Za Nas Kej等团体在地方社区内发展参与性和协商性民主中的作用。我们的数据表明,尽管Za nas kej具有地方特色,但它在社区中并没有很强的立足点,因此只得到被动的支持。市民们认为扎纳斯基是地方机构和萨瓦公寓楼居民之间的调解人。尽管未能动员更广泛的公民群体参与他们的事业,但这个激进组织仍然是当地社区中相关的(政治)行动者。