Comparison of MCNPX and EGSnrc Monte Carlo Codes in the Calculation of Nano-Scaled Absorbed Doses and Secondary Electron Spectra around Clinically Relevant Nanoparticles

Q3 Health Professions
A. Mesbahi, Mostafa Robatjazi, H. Baghani, E. Mansouri, M. Mohammadi
{"title":"Comparison of MCNPX and EGSnrc Monte Carlo Codes in the Calculation of Nano-Scaled Absorbed Doses and Secondary Electron Spectra around Clinically Relevant Nanoparticles","authors":"A. Mesbahi, Mostafa Robatjazi, H. Baghani, E. Mansouri, M. Mohammadi","doi":"10.18502/fbt.v10i3.13149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Absorbed dose enhancement due to the presence of high atomic number Nanoparticles (NP)s has been estimated and modeled by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation methods. In the current study, two MC codes of Monte Carlo N‐Particle eXtended (MCNPX) and EGSnrc codes were compared by calculation of secondary electron energy spectra and nano-scaled dose values around four types of spherical NPs. \nMaterials and Methods: The MC model was composed of a spherical nanoparticle with a diameter of 50 nm and mono-energetic sources of photons with energies of 30,60, and 100 keV. The secondary electrons emitted from the nanoparticle were scored on the nanoparticle surface and the delivered dose to water around the nanoparticle was tallied using concentric shells with a thickness of 25 nm. Four different elements were used as materials of NPs, including Gold, Bismuth, Gadolinium, and Hafnium. \nResults: Our results showed a considerable difference in the number of emitted electrons per incident photon between the two codes. There were also discrepancies between the two codes in the energy spectra of secondary electrons. Calculated radial dose values around NPs in nano-scale had a similar pattern for both codes. However, significant differences existed for some elements. \nConclusion: It can be concluded that the results of nano-scaled MC modeling for nanoparticle-based radiation therapy are dependent on the code type and its algorithm for electron transport as well as exploited cross-section libraries.","PeriodicalId":34203,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fbt.v10i3.13149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Absorbed dose enhancement due to the presence of high atomic number Nanoparticles (NP)s has been estimated and modeled by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation methods. In the current study, two MC codes of Monte Carlo N‐Particle eXtended (MCNPX) and EGSnrc codes were compared by calculation of secondary electron energy spectra and nano-scaled dose values around four types of spherical NPs. Materials and Methods: The MC model was composed of a spherical nanoparticle with a diameter of 50 nm and mono-energetic sources of photons with energies of 30,60, and 100 keV. The secondary electrons emitted from the nanoparticle were scored on the nanoparticle surface and the delivered dose to water around the nanoparticle was tallied using concentric shells with a thickness of 25 nm. Four different elements were used as materials of NPs, including Gold, Bismuth, Gadolinium, and Hafnium. Results: Our results showed a considerable difference in the number of emitted electrons per incident photon between the two codes. There were also discrepancies between the two codes in the energy spectra of secondary electrons. Calculated radial dose values around NPs in nano-scale had a similar pattern for both codes. However, significant differences existed for some elements. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the results of nano-scaled MC modeling for nanoparticle-based radiation therapy are dependent on the code type and its algorithm for electron transport as well as exploited cross-section libraries.
MCNPX和EGSnrc蒙特卡罗代码在计算纳米级吸收剂量和临床相关纳米粒子周围二次电子能谱中的比较
目的:利用蒙特卡罗(MC)模拟方法对高原子序数纳米粒子(NP)的存在引起的吸收剂量增强进行了估计和建模。本研究通过计算四种球形NPs的二次电子能谱和纳米剂量值,比较了蒙特卡洛N -粒子扩展(MCNPX)和EGSnrc两种MC代码。材料与方法:MC模型由直径为50 nm的球形纳米粒子和能量分别为30、60和100 keV的单能光子源组成。利用厚度为25 nm的同心壳层对纳米粒子表面发射的二次电子进行刻划,并对纳米粒子周围的水的传递剂量进行计数。四种不同的元素被用作NPs的材料,包括金、铋、钆和铪。结果:我们的结果表明,在两个码之间,每个入射光子的发射电子数有相当大的差异。在二次电子能谱上,两种编码也存在差异。两种代码在纳米尺度上计算的NPs周围的径向剂量值具有相似的模式。然而,某些元素存在显著差异。结论:基于纳米粒子的放射治疗的纳米尺度MC建模结果依赖于电子传递的编码类型及其算法以及所利用的截面库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信