Creative Thinking of Chemistry and Chemistry Education Students in Biochemistry Learning through Problem Based Learing with Scaffolding Strategy

M. D. W. Ernawati, S. Sudarmin, A. Asrial, D. Muhammad, H. Haryanto
{"title":"Creative Thinking of Chemistry and Chemistry Education Students in Biochemistry Learning through Problem Based Learing with Scaffolding Strategy","authors":"M. D. W. Ernawati, S. Sudarmin, A. Asrial, D. Muhammad, H. Haryanto","doi":"10.15294/jpii.v11i2.33842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to describe students' creative thinking skills in a problem-based learning model with scaffolding in the Biochemistry course. This research is mixed method research with an explanatory sequential research design with a sample of 173 students from the study programs of Chemistry Education and Chemistry, Universitas Jambi. In this study, the researchers only used the experimental class. The sampling technique used is total sampling and purposive sampling. Data were collected using observation sheets, test instruments, interview instruments, and response questionnaires. Quantitative data analysis used is hypothesis testing in the form of ANOVA test with Post-Hoc Scheffe test and T-test. The findings of this study indicate that the ANOVA test results showed a significant difference in the average creative thinking (cognitive) test results and student response questionnaire results in scaffolding-based integrated biochemistry learning. In addition, there is also a significant effect between cognitive test results on student responses in scaffolding-based integrated biochemistry learning. So it can be concluded that there are differences in the creative thinking skills of chemistry education students and pure chemistry students in using scaffolding integrated problem-based learning models in Biochemistry courses.","PeriodicalId":37652,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i2.33842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to describe students' creative thinking skills in a problem-based learning model with scaffolding in the Biochemistry course. This research is mixed method research with an explanatory sequential research design with a sample of 173 students from the study programs of Chemistry Education and Chemistry, Universitas Jambi. In this study, the researchers only used the experimental class. The sampling technique used is total sampling and purposive sampling. Data were collected using observation sheets, test instruments, interview instruments, and response questionnaires. Quantitative data analysis used is hypothesis testing in the form of ANOVA test with Post-Hoc Scheffe test and T-test. The findings of this study indicate that the ANOVA test results showed a significant difference in the average creative thinking (cognitive) test results and student response questionnaire results in scaffolding-based integrated biochemistry learning. In addition, there is also a significant effect between cognitive test results on student responses in scaffolding-based integrated biochemistry learning. So it can be concluded that there are differences in the creative thinking skills of chemistry education students and pure chemistry students in using scaffolding integrated problem-based learning models in Biochemistry courses.
基于问题的脚手架式学习与化学教育学生在生物化学学习中的创新思维
摘要本研究旨在探讨在生物化学课程中,以问题为基础的框架式学习模式下,学生的创造性思维能力。本研究以占比大学化学教育与化学专业173名学生为样本,采用解释序贯研究设计的混合方法研究。在这项研究中,研究人员只使用了实验班。抽样方法分为总抽样和目的抽样。采用观察表、测试工具、访谈工具和问卷调查收集数据。定量数据分析采用方差分析的假设检验,采用事后Scheffe检验和t检验。本研究的结果表明,方差分析结果显示,在基于支架的生物化学综合学习中,学生创造性思维(认知)测试的平均结果与学生反应问卷的结果存在显著差异。此外,认知测试结果对学生在基于支架的生物化学综合学习中的反应也有显著影响。由此可见,化学教育专业学生与纯化学专业学生在生物化学课程中使用脚手架式综合问题学习模式的创造性思维能力存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia
Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy, and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. Moreover, this journal also covers the issues concerned with environmental education & environmental science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信