Beware of the hierarchy — An analysis of ontology evolution and the materialisation impact for biomedical ontologies

IF 2.1 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Romana Pernisch , Daniele Dell’Aglio , Abraham Bernstein
{"title":"Beware of the hierarchy — An analysis of ontology evolution and the materialisation impact for biomedical ontologies","authors":"Romana Pernisch ,&nbsp;Daniele Dell’Aglio ,&nbsp;Abraham Bernstein","doi":"10.1016/j.websem.2021.100658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ontologies are becoming a key component of numerous applications and research fields. But knowledge captured within ontologies is not static. Some ontology updates potentially have a wide ranging impact; others only affect very localised parts of the ontology and their applications. Investigating the impact of the evolution gives us insight into the editing behaviour but also signals ontology engineers and users how the ontology evolution is affecting other applications. However, such research is in its infancy. Hence, we need to investigate the evolution itself and its impact on the simplest of applications: the materialisation.</p><p>In this work, we define impact measures that capture the effect of changes on the materialisation. In the future, the impact measures introduced in this work can be used to investigate how aware the ontology editors are about consequences of changes. By introducing five different measures, which focus either on the change in the materialisation with respect to the size or on the number of changes applied, we are able to quantify the consequences of ontology changes. To see these measures in action, we investigate the evolution and its impact on materialisation for nine open biomedical ontologies, most of which adhere to the <span><math><msup><mrow><mi>EL</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>+</mo><mo>+</mo></mrow></msup></math></span> description logic.</p><p>Our results show that these ontologies evolve at varying paces but no statistically significant difference between the ontologies with respect to their evolution could be identified. We identify three types of ontologies based on the types of complex changes which are applied to them throughout their evolution. The impact on the materialisation is the same for the investigated ontologies, bringing us to the conclusion that the effect of changes on the materialisation can be generalised to other similar ontologies. Further, we found that the materialised concept inclusion axioms experience most of the impact induced by changes to the class inheritance of the ontology and other changes only marginally touch the materialisation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Web Semantics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.websem.2021.100658","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Web Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570826821000330","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Ontologies are becoming a key component of numerous applications and research fields. But knowledge captured within ontologies is not static. Some ontology updates potentially have a wide ranging impact; others only affect very localised parts of the ontology and their applications. Investigating the impact of the evolution gives us insight into the editing behaviour but also signals ontology engineers and users how the ontology evolution is affecting other applications. However, such research is in its infancy. Hence, we need to investigate the evolution itself and its impact on the simplest of applications: the materialisation.

In this work, we define impact measures that capture the effect of changes on the materialisation. In the future, the impact measures introduced in this work can be used to investigate how aware the ontology editors are about consequences of changes. By introducing five different measures, which focus either on the change in the materialisation with respect to the size or on the number of changes applied, we are able to quantify the consequences of ontology changes. To see these measures in action, we investigate the evolution and its impact on materialisation for nine open biomedical ontologies, most of which adhere to the EL++ description logic.

Our results show that these ontologies evolve at varying paces but no statistically significant difference between the ontologies with respect to their evolution could be identified. We identify three types of ontologies based on the types of complex changes which are applied to them throughout their evolution. The impact on the materialisation is the same for the investigated ontologies, bringing us to the conclusion that the effect of changes on the materialisation can be generalised to other similar ontologies. Further, we found that the materialised concept inclusion axioms experience most of the impact induced by changes to the class inheritance of the ontology and other changes only marginally touch the materialisation.

谨防层次结构-对生物医学本体进化和物质化影响的分析
本体正在成为众多应用和研究领域的关键组成部分。但是在本体中获取的知识不是静态的。一些本体更新可能会产生广泛的影响;其他的只影响本体及其应用的非常局部的部分。研究进化的影响可以让我们深入了解编辑行为,还可以向本体工程师和用户发出信号,说明本体进化如何影响其他应用程序。然而,这类研究还处于起步阶段。因此,我们需要研究进化本身及其对最简单的应用程序的影响:物质化。在这项工作中,我们定义了影响措施,以捕获变化对物化的影响。在未来,本工作中引入的影响度量可用于调查本体编辑对更改后果的了解程度。通过引入五种不同的度量,这些度量要么关注与大小相关的物化中的变化,要么关注应用的变化的数量,我们能够量化本体变化的结果。为了观察这些措施的作用,我们研究了9个开放生物医学本体的演变及其对物质化的影响,其中大多数坚持el++描述逻辑。我们的研究结果表明,这些本体以不同的速度进化,但就其进化而言,这些本体之间没有统计学上的显著差异。我们根据在整个发展过程中应用于它们的复杂变化的类型确定了三种类型的本体。对于所研究的本体论,对物化的影响是相同的,这使我们得出结论,变化对物化的影响可以推广到其他类似的本体论。此外,我们发现物化概念包含公理受到本体类继承变化的大部分影响,而其他变化仅略微触及物化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Web Semantics
Journal of Web Semantics 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
14.6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Web Semantics is an interdisciplinary journal based on research and applications of various subject areas that contribute to the development of a knowledge-intensive and intelligent service Web. These areas include: knowledge technologies, ontology, agents, databases and the semantic grid, obviously disciplines like information retrieval, language technology, human-computer interaction and knowledge discovery are of major relevance as well. All aspects of the Semantic Web development are covered. The publication of large-scale experiments and their analysis is also encouraged to clearly illustrate scenarios and methods that introduce semantics into existing Web interfaces, contents and services. The journal emphasizes the publication of papers that combine theories, methods and experiments from different subject areas in order to deliver innovative semantic methods and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信