Insights into Inconsistent Infant Safe Sleep Practices among African American Caregivers

Malliga Jambulingam, M. Alston, Ariel Hunt, David Thomas, Y. Bronner
{"title":"Insights into Inconsistent Infant Safe Sleep Practices among African American Caregivers","authors":"Malliga Jambulingam, M. Alston, Ariel Hunt, David Thomas, Y. Bronner","doi":"10.12691/ajphr-9-5-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: After the 1994 national “Safe Sleep Campaign,” acceptance of infant sleep practices was followed by a significant reduction in the national SIDS death rate. Interestingly, SIDS deaths of African American (AA) infants has remained comparatively high --creating an incidence rate disparity. The elusive question is “why?” Understanding the basis of infant safe sleep practices by given AA caregivers is therefore important to effectively address inconsistency surrounding the “ABCs” of safe sleep practices. Objective: To understand the knowledge base, attitudes, circumstances, and current behavioral patterns surrounding infant safe sleep practices among given AA caregivers. Methods: A purposive sampling strategy, including 31 participants from three targeted Baltimore communities, was employed. Knowledge and attitudes of caregivers were assessed using a Focus Group questionnaire to draw participant responses about why ABC strategies for safe sleep were not consistently followed. Caregivers’ practices of infant placement for sleep were first assessed by having them demonstrate their routine using a life-size doll in a crib which purposefully contained other items. All group conversations were audio-recorded and transcribed. Collected data were analyzed using Atlasti and by two researchers. Results: A substantial percentage of the AA caregivers of these communities did not fully understand safety-based and anatomical rationale for placing infants alone and on their backs for sleep. Many expressed fears that the baby might choke, the goal of getting maximum sleep for baby and caretaker, while some sought easy monitoring ability. Conclusion: Understanding the misgivings, circumstances, and fears are instrumental for imagining and supplementing existing safe sleep practice recommendations. Continued Town Hall forums that include practical demonstrations, along with meaningful discussions with educational tools, inclusive of Q & A follow-up should be developed to reduce fears and misconceptions to best increase consistent practice of placing infants alone in supine reduce the risk of SRID.","PeriodicalId":90785,"journal":{"name":"American journal of public health research","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of public health research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12691/ajphr-9-5-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: After the 1994 national “Safe Sleep Campaign,” acceptance of infant sleep practices was followed by a significant reduction in the national SIDS death rate. Interestingly, SIDS deaths of African American (AA) infants has remained comparatively high --creating an incidence rate disparity. The elusive question is “why?” Understanding the basis of infant safe sleep practices by given AA caregivers is therefore important to effectively address inconsistency surrounding the “ABCs” of safe sleep practices. Objective: To understand the knowledge base, attitudes, circumstances, and current behavioral patterns surrounding infant safe sleep practices among given AA caregivers. Methods: A purposive sampling strategy, including 31 participants from three targeted Baltimore communities, was employed. Knowledge and attitudes of caregivers were assessed using a Focus Group questionnaire to draw participant responses about why ABC strategies for safe sleep were not consistently followed. Caregivers’ practices of infant placement for sleep were first assessed by having them demonstrate their routine using a life-size doll in a crib which purposefully contained other items. All group conversations were audio-recorded and transcribed. Collected data were analyzed using Atlasti and by two researchers. Results: A substantial percentage of the AA caregivers of these communities did not fully understand safety-based and anatomical rationale for placing infants alone and on their backs for sleep. Many expressed fears that the baby might choke, the goal of getting maximum sleep for baby and caretaker, while some sought easy monitoring ability. Conclusion: Understanding the misgivings, circumstances, and fears are instrumental for imagining and supplementing existing safe sleep practice recommendations. Continued Town Hall forums that include practical demonstrations, along with meaningful discussions with educational tools, inclusive of Q & A follow-up should be developed to reduce fears and misconceptions to best increase consistent practice of placing infants alone in supine reduce the risk of SRID.
非裔美国人照顾者中不一致的婴儿安全睡眠实践的见解
背景:在1994年全国“安全睡眠运动”之后,接受婴儿睡眠做法之后,全国小岛屿发展中国家死亡率显著降低。有趣的是,非洲裔美国人(AA)婴儿的SIDS死亡率相对较高,造成了发病率的差异。难以捉摸的问题是“为什么?”因此,了解特定AA护理人员的婴儿安全睡眠实践基础对于有效解决围绕安全睡眠实践“abc”的不一致是很重要的。目的:了解特定护理人员在婴儿安全睡眠实践方面的知识基础、态度、环境和当前行为模式。方法:采用有目的的抽样策略,包括来自巴尔的摩三个目标社区的31名参与者。使用焦点小组问卷来评估护理人员的知识和态度,以得出参与者对为什么ABC策略安全睡眠没有始终遵循的回答。首先,对看护人安排婴儿睡觉的做法进行了评估,让他们用一个真人大小的娃娃放在婴儿床里,婴儿床里故意放着其他东西。所有的小组对话都被录音和转录。收集的数据由两名研究人员使用Atlasti进行分析。结果:这些社区中相当大比例的AA护理人员并不完全了解将婴儿单独放置和仰卧睡觉的安全性和解剖学原理。许多人表示担心婴儿可能会窒息,目标是让婴儿和看护人获得最大的睡眠,而一些人则寻求易于监控的能力。结论:了解疑虑、情况和恐惧有助于想象和补充现有的安全睡眠实践建议。应开展持续的市政厅论坛,包括实际演示,以及与教育工具进行有意义的讨论,包括问答后续行动,以减少恐惧和误解,从而最好地增加将婴儿单独置于仰卧位的一致做法,降低SRID的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信