MODIFIED AUDIT OPINION AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT IN STATE-OWNED COMPANIES: EVIDENCE FROM SERBIA

Milica Đorđević, D. Spasić
{"title":"MODIFIED AUDIT OPINION AND EARNINGS MANAGEMENT IN STATE-OWNED COMPANIES: EVIDENCE FROM SERBIA","authors":"Milica Đorđević, D. Spasić","doi":"10.22190/fueo221019020d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the author of this paper is to examine the relationship between Earning Management (EM) and modified audit opinion among state-owned companies in the Republic of Serbia. The study sample consists of 64 state-owned companies whose financial statements were subject of audit by State Audit Institution in period 2018-2021. To detect EM, the financial statements of these companies for the four-year period 2018-2021 were used. The results of the study indicate that there is no positive relationship between EM and the auditor's modified opinion, i.e. that the difference in the distribution of the modified opinion in state-owned companies in which EM is identified and those in which EM is not identified is not statistically significant. These results initially point to the conclusion that auditors do not take EM into account when forming opinions, and do not send warning signals to users of financial statements. However, if one looks at the participation of the modified opinion on the financial statements of state-owned companies in which EM is identified, and especially the motive of EM, it can be said that the auditors of the State Audit Institution are adequately dedicated to this issue.","PeriodicalId":31607,"journal":{"name":"Facta Universitatis Series Economics and Organization","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facta Universitatis Series Economics and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/fueo221019020d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the author of this paper is to examine the relationship between Earning Management (EM) and modified audit opinion among state-owned companies in the Republic of Serbia. The study sample consists of 64 state-owned companies whose financial statements were subject of audit by State Audit Institution in period 2018-2021. To detect EM, the financial statements of these companies for the four-year period 2018-2021 were used. The results of the study indicate that there is no positive relationship between EM and the auditor's modified opinion, i.e. that the difference in the distribution of the modified opinion in state-owned companies in which EM is identified and those in which EM is not identified is not statistically significant. These results initially point to the conclusion that auditors do not take EM into account when forming opinions, and do not send warning signals to users of financial statements. However, if one looks at the participation of the modified opinion on the financial statements of state-owned companies in which EM is identified, and especially the motive of EM, it can be said that the auditors of the State Audit Institution are adequately dedicated to this issue.
修改审计意见与国有企业盈余管理:来自塞尔维亚的证据
本文的目的是研究塞尔维亚国有企业盈余管理与修改审计意见之间的关系。本研究样本包括64家国有企业,这些企业的财务报表在2018-2021年期间接受了国家审计机关的审计。为了检测新兴市场,我们使用了这些公司2018-2021年四年的财务报表。研究结果表明,新兴市场与审计师修改意见之间不存在正相关关系,即在识别了新兴市场的国有企业和未识别新兴市场的国有企业中,修改意见的分布差异不具有统计学意义。这些结果最初指向的结论是,审计师在形成意见时没有考虑到新兴市场,也没有向财务报表使用者发出警告信号。然而,如果我们从国有企业财务报表修改意见的参与来看,特别是新兴市场的动机,可以说,国家审计机关的审计师对这一问题的投入是充分的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信