An update of serial interval estimates for COVID-19: a meta-analysis

4open Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1051/fopen/2022017
J. Jusot
{"title":"An update of serial interval estimates for COVID-19: a meta-analysis","authors":"J. Jusot","doi":"10.1051/fopen/2022017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Serial interval (SI) is one of the most important parameter for COVID-19 modelling purposes as it is related to the reproduction rate of the infection. The first meta-analysis of serial interval were performed with a range of uncertainty in the estimate. This meta-analysis aimed to reduce the uncertainty estimates by assessing publications over a longer period. Methods: A literature search was performed for articles published between 1st December 2019 and 15th February 2022. It retrieved 117 eligible studies containing some 80 for 90 serial interval estimates. A random effects model was used. Heterogeneity was checked. To detect a publication bias, a funnel plot was performed using an Egger’s test. Results: For alpha variant, the serial interval was estimated at 5.17 days (95% CI = 4.87 – 5.47) with a significant heterogeneity (I2 = 97.1%). The meta-analysis did not exhibit evident publication bias (Egger’s test = −0.55, p = 0.58). The meta-analysis allowed for reducing uncertainty in estimating the serial interval, although subgroup analysis did not reduce it sufficiently and showed that studies using a gamma distribution of serial intervals exhibited the highest estimate of 5.6 days. Compared to the other variants of concern, alpha serial interval estimate was bigger than delta, 4.07 days, and omicron, 3.06 days. Conclusion: The meta-analysis was carried out as a real-time monitoring of this parameter to make a choice and a rapid assessment of the control measures implemented, and the effectiveness of the vaccination campaign. The meta-analysis was unable to provide a suitable estimate of serial intervals for COVID-19 modelling purposes although its uncertainty was reduced. Furthermore, serial intervals estimate for alpha variant was close to earlier reports and lower than previous publications, respectively. Another limitation is, that meta-analysis of COVID pandemic studies in principle contains and produces itself a significant source of heterogeneity.","PeriodicalId":6841,"journal":{"name":"4open","volume":"95 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"4open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/fopen/2022017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Serial interval (SI) is one of the most important parameter for COVID-19 modelling purposes as it is related to the reproduction rate of the infection. The first meta-analysis of serial interval were performed with a range of uncertainty in the estimate. This meta-analysis aimed to reduce the uncertainty estimates by assessing publications over a longer period. Methods: A literature search was performed for articles published between 1st December 2019 and 15th February 2022. It retrieved 117 eligible studies containing some 80 for 90 serial interval estimates. A random effects model was used. Heterogeneity was checked. To detect a publication bias, a funnel plot was performed using an Egger’s test. Results: For alpha variant, the serial interval was estimated at 5.17 days (95% CI = 4.87 – 5.47) with a significant heterogeneity (I2 = 97.1%). The meta-analysis did not exhibit evident publication bias (Egger’s test = −0.55, p = 0.58). The meta-analysis allowed for reducing uncertainty in estimating the serial interval, although subgroup analysis did not reduce it sufficiently and showed that studies using a gamma distribution of serial intervals exhibited the highest estimate of 5.6 days. Compared to the other variants of concern, alpha serial interval estimate was bigger than delta, 4.07 days, and omicron, 3.06 days. Conclusion: The meta-analysis was carried out as a real-time monitoring of this parameter to make a choice and a rapid assessment of the control measures implemented, and the effectiveness of the vaccination campaign. The meta-analysis was unable to provide a suitable estimate of serial intervals for COVID-19 modelling purposes although its uncertainty was reduced. Furthermore, serial intervals estimate for alpha variant was close to earlier reports and lower than previous publications, respectively. Another limitation is, that meta-analysis of COVID pandemic studies in principle contains and produces itself a significant source of heterogeneity.
COVID-19序列间隔估计的更新:一项荟萃分析
背景:序列间隔(SI)是COVID-19建模中最重要的参数之一,因为它与感染的繁殖率有关。序列区间的第一次荟萃分析在估计的不确定性范围内进行。本荟萃分析旨在通过评估较长时期的出版物来减少不确定性估计。方法:检索2019年12月1日至2022年2月15日发表的文献。它检索了117项符合条件的研究,其中包括90个序列区间估计中的80个。采用随机效应模型。检验异质性。为检测发表偏倚,采用Egger检验绘制漏斗图。结果:对于α变异,序列间隔估计为5.17天(95% CI = 4.87 - 5.47),具有显著的异质性(I2 = 97.1%)。meta分析未显示明显的发表偏倚(Egger检验= - 0.55,p = 0.58)。meta分析允许减少估计序列间隔的不确定性,尽管亚组分析并没有充分减少不确定性,并且表明使用序列间隔的伽玛分布的研究显示出5.6天的最高估计。与其他关注变量相比,alpha序列间隔估计大于delta(4.07天)和omicron(3.06天)。结论:通过对该参数的实时监测进行meta分析,可以对所采取的控制措施和疫苗接种活动的效果进行选择和快速评估。该荟萃分析无法为COVID-19建模提供合适的序列间隔估计,尽管其不确定性降低了。此外,α变量的序列间隔估计分别接近于早期报告和低于以前的出版物。另一个限制是,对COVID大流行研究的荟萃分析原则上包含并产生了一个重要的异质性来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信