An analysis of a novel Canadian pilot health information exchange to improve transitions between hospital and long-term care/skilled nursing facility

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Tyler Aird, Ceara Holditch, S. Culgin, Margareta Vanderheyden, G. Rutledge, Carlo Encinareal, D. Perri, Fraser Edward, Hugh Boyd
{"title":"An analysis of a novel Canadian pilot health information exchange to improve transitions between hospital and long-term care/skilled nursing facility","authors":"Tyler Aird, Ceara Holditch, S. Culgin, Margareta Vanderheyden, G. Rutledge, Carlo Encinareal, D. Perri, Fraser Edward, Hugh Boyd","doi":"10.1108/jica-03-2022-0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of the article is to assess the effectiveness, compliance, adoption and lessons learnt from the pilot implementation of a data integration solution between an acute care hospital information system (HIS) and a long-term care (LTC) home electronic medical record through a case report.Design/methodology/approachUtilization statistics of the data integration solution were captured at one-month post implementation and again one year later for both the emergency department (ED) and LTC home. Clinician feedback from surveys and structured interviews was obtained from ED physicians and a multidisciplinary LTC group.FindingsThe authors successfully exchanged health information between a HIS and the electronic medical record (EMR) of an LTC facility in Canada. Perceived time savings were acknowledged by ED physicians, and actual time savings as high as 45 min were reported by LTC staff when completing medication reconciliation. Barriers to adoption included awareness, training efficacy and delivery models, workflow integration within existing practice and the limited number of facilities participating in the pilot. Future direction includes broader staff involvement, expanding the number of sites and re-evaluating impacts.Practical implicationsA data integration solution to exchange clinical information can make patient transfers more efficient, reduce data transcription errors, and improve the visibility of essential patient information across the continuum of care.Originality/valueAlthough there has been a large effort to integrate health data across care levels in the United States and internationally, the groundwork for such integrations between interoperable systems has only just begun in Canada. The implementation of the integration between an enterprise LTC electronic medical record system and an HIS described herein is the first of its kind in Canada. Benefits and lessons learnt from this pilot will be useful for further hospital-to-LTC home interoperability work.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-03-2022-0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the article is to assess the effectiveness, compliance, adoption and lessons learnt from the pilot implementation of a data integration solution between an acute care hospital information system (HIS) and a long-term care (LTC) home electronic medical record through a case report.Design/methodology/approachUtilization statistics of the data integration solution were captured at one-month post implementation and again one year later for both the emergency department (ED) and LTC home. Clinician feedback from surveys and structured interviews was obtained from ED physicians and a multidisciplinary LTC group.FindingsThe authors successfully exchanged health information between a HIS and the electronic medical record (EMR) of an LTC facility in Canada. Perceived time savings were acknowledged by ED physicians, and actual time savings as high as 45 min were reported by LTC staff when completing medication reconciliation. Barriers to adoption included awareness, training efficacy and delivery models, workflow integration within existing practice and the limited number of facilities participating in the pilot. Future direction includes broader staff involvement, expanding the number of sites and re-evaluating impacts.Practical implicationsA data integration solution to exchange clinical information can make patient transfers more efficient, reduce data transcription errors, and improve the visibility of essential patient information across the continuum of care.Originality/valueAlthough there has been a large effort to integrate health data across care levels in the United States and internationally, the groundwork for such integrations between interoperable systems has only just begun in Canada. The implementation of the integration between an enterprise LTC electronic medical record system and an HIS described herein is the first of its kind in Canada. Benefits and lessons learnt from this pilot will be useful for further hospital-to-LTC home interoperability work.
对加拿大一项旨在改善医院与长期护理/熟练护理机构之间过渡的新型试点卫生信息交换的分析
本文的目的是通过案例报告评估急症护理医院信息系统(HIS)和长期护理(LTC)家庭电子病历之间数据集成解决方案试点实施的有效性、合规性、采用情况和经验教训。设计/方法/方法数据集成解决方案的使用统计数据在实施后一个月和一年后分别用于急诊科(ED)和LTC家庭。从急诊科医生和多学科LTC组获得调查和结构化访谈的临床医生反馈。研究结果:作者成功地在加拿大一家LTC机构的HIS和电子病历(EMR)之间交换了健康信息。急诊科医生认可了感知的时间节省,LTC工作人员在完成药物调节时报告的实际时间节省高达45分钟。采用的障碍包括意识、培训效率和交付模式、现有实践中的工作流程集成以及参与试点的设施数量有限。未来的方向包括更广泛的员工参与,扩大站点数量和重新评估影响。实际意义用于交换临床信息的数据集成解决方案可以提高患者转移的效率,减少数据转录错误,并提高整个连续护理过程中基本患者信息的可见性。原创性/价值尽管在美国和国际上已经做出了很大的努力来整合跨护理级别的健康数据,但在加拿大,这种在可互操作系统之间进行整合的基础工作才刚刚开始。本文所述的企业LTC电子医疗记录系统与HIS之间的集成实现是加拿大同类系统中的第一个。从该试点中获得的好处和经验教训将有助于进一步开展医院到ltc家庭的互操作性工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信