[Physicians' adherence to the guidelines on the chronic heart failure diagnosis and treatment].

N. B. Perpech, A. Tregubov, I. E. Mikhailova
{"title":"[Physicians' adherence to the guidelines on the chronic heart failure diagnosis and treatment].","authors":"N. B. Perpech, A. Tregubov, I. E. Mikhailova","doi":"10.18087/cardio.2022.5.n1755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim      To evaluate the physician's knowledge of basic provisions of clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) and to determine how the actions of physicians in their everyday clinical practice comply with these provisions.Materials and methods The study analyzed anonymous questionnaires of 185 physicians (127 cardiologists, 40 internists and general practitioners, 18 other specialists) who were trained in advanced training programs during the 2020/2021 academic year. The main part of the questionnaire included 15 questions related to the classification, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, and the use of implantable devices in the treatment of patients with CHF.Results The results showed that internists were less than cardiologists aware of major provisions of clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of CHF. However, the knowledge of cardiologists could not be considered sufficient either. 57.5% of internists and 30% of cardiologists incorrectly indicated the main echocardiographic criterion for diagnosis of CHF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (CHFrEF). More than 40% of internists did not consider fluid retention with development of the congestion syndrome as a mandatory condition for administration of a loop diuretic to a patient with CHFrEF. 34.6% of cardiologists and 25% of internists correctly determined the indication for the administration of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. 37.6% of internists and 21.1% of cardiologists incorrectly indicated the dose of spironolactone recommended for achieving the neuromodulation effect.   In determining doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers, after arriving at which it is necessary to stop their up-titration, most of the physicians preferred to be based on systolic blood pressure (SBP) rather than on symptoms of hypotension. However, among therapists there were doctors for whom the patient's well-being and clinical symptoms, and not the level of SBP, were priority factors for choosing the tactics of the treatment with ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. Physicians of both specialties were poorly familiar with indications for cardioverter defibrillator implantation; only 14.2% of cardiologists and 5% of internists chose the correct wording of indications.Conclusion      The insufficient knowledge should be considered the basis for the low adherence of doctors to guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of CHF. When developing programs for advanced training of physicians in CHF, special attention should be paid to the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and beta-blockers with detailed discussion of the dosing principles as well as of indications for implantation and results of using cardioverter defibrillators.","PeriodicalId":33976,"journal":{"name":"B''lgarska kardiologiia","volume":"50 1","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B''lgarska kardiologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18087/cardio.2022.5.n1755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim      To evaluate the physician's knowledge of basic provisions of clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF) and to determine how the actions of physicians in their everyday clinical practice comply with these provisions.Materials and methods The study analyzed anonymous questionnaires of 185 physicians (127 cardiologists, 40 internists and general practitioners, 18 other specialists) who were trained in advanced training programs during the 2020/2021 academic year. The main part of the questionnaire included 15 questions related to the classification, diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, and the use of implantable devices in the treatment of patients with CHF.Results The results showed that internists were less than cardiologists aware of major provisions of clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of CHF. However, the knowledge of cardiologists could not be considered sufficient either. 57.5% of internists and 30% of cardiologists incorrectly indicated the main echocardiographic criterion for diagnosis of CHF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (CHFrEF). More than 40% of internists did not consider fluid retention with development of the congestion syndrome as a mandatory condition for administration of a loop diuretic to a patient with CHFrEF. 34.6% of cardiologists and 25% of internists correctly determined the indication for the administration of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. 37.6% of internists and 21.1% of cardiologists incorrectly indicated the dose of spironolactone recommended for achieving the neuromodulation effect.   In determining doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta-blockers, after arriving at which it is necessary to stop their up-titration, most of the physicians preferred to be based on systolic blood pressure (SBP) rather than on symptoms of hypotension. However, among therapists there were doctors for whom the patient's well-being and clinical symptoms, and not the level of SBP, were priority factors for choosing the tactics of the treatment with ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. Physicians of both specialties were poorly familiar with indications for cardioverter defibrillator implantation; only 14.2% of cardiologists and 5% of internists chose the correct wording of indications.Conclusion      The insufficient knowledge should be considered the basis for the low adherence of doctors to guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of CHF. When developing programs for advanced training of physicians in CHF, special attention should be paid to the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and beta-blockers with detailed discussion of the dosing principles as well as of indications for implantation and results of using cardioverter defibrillators.
[医生对慢性心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南的依从性]。
目的评估医师对慢性心力衰竭(CHF)诊断和治疗临床指南基本条款的了解程度,并确定医师在日常临床实践中如何遵守这些条款。材料与方法本研究分析了185名医生(127名心脏病专家,40名内科医生和全科医生,18名其他专家)在2020/2021学年接受高级培训项目培训的匿名问卷。问卷的主要部分包括15个问题,涉及到CHF患者的分类、诊断、药物治疗和植入式装置的使用。结果内科医师对慢性心力衰竭主要临床诊疗指南的了解程度低于心脏科医师。然而,心脏病专家的知识也不能被认为是足够的。57.5%的内科医生和30%的心脏病专家错误地指出了诊断伴有左室射血分数降低(CHFrEF)的CHF的主要超声心动图标准。超过40%的内科医生不认为伴有充血综合征的液体潴留是对CHFrEF患者给予环状利尿剂的强制性条件。34.6%的心脏病专家和25%的内科医生正确地确定了矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂的适应症。37.6%的内科医生和21.1%的心脏科医生错误地指出了为达到神经调节效果而推荐的螺内酯剂量。在确定血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂和受体阻滞剂的剂量时,在达到必须停止其升滴后,大多数医生倾向于根据收缩压(SBP)而不是低血压症状来确定剂量。然而,在治疗师中,有医生认为患者的健康和临床症状,而不是收缩压水平,是选择ACE抑制剂和受体阻滞剂治疗策略的优先因素。这两个专业的医生都不太熟悉心律转复除颤器植入的适应症;只有14.2%的心脏病专家和5%的内科医生选择了正确的适应症措辞。结论对CHF的认识不足是导致医生对诊断和治疗指南依从性较低的原因。在制定CHF医生高级培训计划时,应特别注意肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂的使用,并详细讨论剂量原则、植入适应症和使用心律转复除颤器的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信