Beauty Inside Out: Examining Beauty Product Use Among Diverse Women and Femme-Identifying Individuals in Northern Manhattan and South Bronx Through an Environmental Justice Framework.

IF 1.7 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Environmental Justice Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1089/env.2022.0053
Lariah Edwards, Lubna Ahmed, Leslie Martinez, Sophia Huda, Bhavna Shamasunder, Jasmine A McDonald, Robert Dubrow, Beaumont Morton, Ami R Zota
{"title":"Beauty Inside Out: Examining Beauty Product Use Among Diverse Women and Femme-Identifying Individuals in Northern Manhattan and South Bronx Through an Environmental Justice Framework.","authors":"Lariah Edwards, Lubna Ahmed, Leslie Martinez, Sophia Huda, Bhavna Shamasunder, Jasmine A McDonald, Robert Dubrow, Beaumont Morton, Ami R Zota","doi":"10.1089/env.2022.0053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The disproportionate use of chemical straighteners and skin lighteners by women of color is a growing public health concern given the link between product use and adverse health effects. Prior studies examined product use as an individual choice but neglected social-structural factors, which influence beauty perceptions and personal decisions around product use. We used a community-based participatory research approach to characterize product use by demographics and investigated how racialized beauty norms impact use among 297 women and femme-identifying individuals in Northern Manhattan and the South Bronx. Product use varied by race/ethnicity, nativity, and messaging from family and peers. Black respondents were more likely to ever use chemical straighteners than non-Black respondents (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.2-3.2), as were respondents who heard that family members express a preference for straight hair compared with respondents whose family members expressed mixed preferences about hairstyles (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.1-3.7). Compared with non-Asian respondents and respondents born in the United States, Asian respondents and respondents born in other countries, respectively, had threefold higher odds of ever using skin lighteners (Asian: OR = 3.2; 95% CI = 1.4-7.0; born in other countries: OR = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.9-6.1). Respondents' perceptions that others believe straight hair or lighter skin confer benefits such as beauty, professionalism, or youth were associated with greater use of chemical straighteners and skin lighteners. These findings highlight the pervasiveness of racialized beauty norms and point to the need to reduce the demand for and sale of these products through community education, market-based strategies, and public policy.</p>","PeriodicalId":46143,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10704575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2022.0053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The disproportionate use of chemical straighteners and skin lighteners by women of color is a growing public health concern given the link between product use and adverse health effects. Prior studies examined product use as an individual choice but neglected social-structural factors, which influence beauty perceptions and personal decisions around product use. We used a community-based participatory research approach to characterize product use by demographics and investigated how racialized beauty norms impact use among 297 women and femme-identifying individuals in Northern Manhattan and the South Bronx. Product use varied by race/ethnicity, nativity, and messaging from family and peers. Black respondents were more likely to ever use chemical straighteners than non-Black respondents (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.2-3.2), as were respondents who heard that family members express a preference for straight hair compared with respondents whose family members expressed mixed preferences about hairstyles (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.1-3.7). Compared with non-Asian respondents and respondents born in the United States, Asian respondents and respondents born in other countries, respectively, had threefold higher odds of ever using skin lighteners (Asian: OR = 3.2; 95% CI = 1.4-7.0; born in other countries: OR = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.9-6.1). Respondents' perceptions that others believe straight hair or lighter skin confer benefits such as beauty, professionalism, or youth were associated with greater use of chemical straighteners and skin lighteners. These findings highlight the pervasiveness of racialized beauty norms and point to the need to reduce the demand for and sale of these products through community education, market-based strategies, and public policy.

由内而外的美丽:通过环境正义框架考察曼哈顿北部和南布朗克斯地区不同女性和女性身份认同者使用美容产品的情况。
鉴于产品使用与不良健康影响之间的联系,有色人种女性过多使用化学直发器和皮肤美白剂日益成为一个公共健康问题。之前的研究将产品的使用视为个人选择,但忽略了社会结构因素,而这些因素会影响人们对美的看法和个人对产品使用的决定。我们采用了一种基于社区的参与式研究方法,按人口统计学特征来描述产品的使用情况,并调查了种族化的美容规范如何影响曼哈顿北部和南布朗克斯区 297 名女性和女性身份认同者的产品使用情况。产品使用情况因种族/民族、出生地以及来自家庭和同龄人的信息而异。黑人受访者比非黑人受访者更有可能使用化学直发器(OR = 2.0;95% CI = 1.2-3.2),听说家人喜欢直发的受访者也比家人对发型喜好不一的受访者更有可能使用化学直发器(OR = 2.0;95% CI = 1.1-3.7)。与非亚裔受访者和在美国出生的受访者相比,亚裔受访者和在其他国家出生的受访者使用过美白剂的几率分别高出三倍(亚裔:OR = 3.2;95% CI = 1.1-3.7):OR=3.2;95% CI=1.4-7.0;在其他国家出生的受访者:OR=3.4;95% CI=1.9-6.1)。受访者认为他人认为直发或浅色皮肤会带来美丽、专业或年轻等好处与更多使用化学直发器和皮肤美白剂有关。这些发现凸显了种族化美容规范的普遍性,并指出有必要通过社区教育、市场策略和公共政策来减少对这些产品的需求和销售。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Justice
Environmental Justice ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Environmental Justice, a quarterly peer-reviewed journal, is the central forum for the research, debate, and discussion of the equitable treatment and involvement of all people, especially minority and low-income populations, with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. The Journal explores the adverse and disparate environmental burden impacting marginalized populations and communities all over the world. Environmental Justice draws upon the expertise and perspectives of all parties involved in environmental justice struggles: communities, industry, academia, government, and nonprofit organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信