Purity and pollution: a feminist rewriting of State of Uttar Pradesh v. Kaushailiya AIR 1964 SC 416

Anindita Pattanayak, D. McDonald-Norman
{"title":"Purity and pollution: a feminist rewriting of State of Uttar Pradesh v. Kaushailiya AIR 1964 SC 416","authors":"Anindita Pattanayak, D. McDonald-Norman","doi":"10.1080/24730580.2021.1905339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Supreme Court’s judgement in State of Uttar Pradesh v Kaushailiya (“Kaushailiya”) affirmed the constitutionality of section 20 of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act 1956. Our “alternative judgement” and commentary challenge the reasoning of the bench in that case from a feminist perspective, including Subba Rao J’s implicit use of concepts of contamination and pollution to support his Lordship’s reasoning.","PeriodicalId":13511,"journal":{"name":"Indian Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/24730580.2021.1905339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Supreme Court’s judgement in State of Uttar Pradesh v Kaushailiya (“Kaushailiya”) affirmed the constitutionality of section 20 of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act 1956. Our “alternative judgement” and commentary challenge the reasoning of the bench in that case from a feminist perspective, including Subba Rao J’s implicit use of concepts of contamination and pollution to support his Lordship’s reasoning.
纯净与污染:女权主义者对北方邦诉考沙利亚案(1964 SC 416)的改写
印度最高法院在北方邦诉考沙利亚案(“考沙利亚”)一案中确认了1956年《禁止不道德买卖妇女和女童法》第20条的合宪性。我们的“另类判断”和评论从女权主义的角度对法官的推理提出了挑战,包括苏巴·拉奥(Subba Rao J)隐含地使用污染和污染的概念来支持法官的推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信