TeamSTEPPS online simulation: expanding access to teamwork training for medical students

IF 1.1 Q2 Social Sciences
Rebekah Burns, M. Gray, Dana Peralta, Andrew Scheets, R. Umoren
{"title":"TeamSTEPPS online simulation: expanding access to teamwork training for medical students","authors":"Rebekah Burns, M. Gray, Dana Peralta, Andrew Scheets, R. Umoren","doi":"10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) programme is an evidence-based approach to teamwork training. In-person education is not always feasible for medical student education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of online, interactive TeamSTEPPS simulation versus an in-person simulation on medical students’ TeamSTEPPS knowledge and attitudes. Methods Fourth-year medical students self-selected into an in-person or online training designed to teach and evaluate teamwork skills. In-person participants received didactic sessions, team-based medical simulations and facilitated debriefing sessions. The online group received an equivalent online didactic session and participated in an interactive software-based simulation with immediate, personalised performance-based feedback and scripted debriefing. Both trainings used three iterations of a case of septic shock, each with increasing medical complexity. Participants completed a demographic survey, a preintervention/postintervention TeamSTEPPS Benchmarks test and a retrospective preintervention/postintervention TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and repeated measures analysis of variance. Results Thirty-one students (18 in-person, 13 online) completed preintervention/postintervention surveys, tests and questionnaires. Gender, age and exposure to interprofessional education, teamwork training and games were similar between groups. There were no statistical differences in preintervention knowledge or teamwork attitude scores between in-person and online groups. Postintervention knowledge scores increased significantly from baseline (+2.0% p=0.047), and these gains did not differ significantly based on whether participants received in-person versus online training (+1.5% vs +2.9%; p=0.49). Teamwork attitudes scores also showed a statistically significant increase with training (+0.9, p<0.01) with no difference in the effect of training by group (+0.8 vs +1.0; p=0.64). Conclusions Graduating medical students who received in-person and online teamwork training showed similar increases in TeamSTEPPS knowledge and attitudes. Online simulations may be used to teach and reinforce team communication skills when in-person, interprofessional simulations are not feasible.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background The Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS) programme is an evidence-based approach to teamwork training. In-person education is not always feasible for medical student education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of online, interactive TeamSTEPPS simulation versus an in-person simulation on medical students’ TeamSTEPPS knowledge and attitudes. Methods Fourth-year medical students self-selected into an in-person or online training designed to teach and evaluate teamwork skills. In-person participants received didactic sessions, team-based medical simulations and facilitated debriefing sessions. The online group received an equivalent online didactic session and participated in an interactive software-based simulation with immediate, personalised performance-based feedback and scripted debriefing. Both trainings used three iterations of a case of septic shock, each with increasing medical complexity. Participants completed a demographic survey, a preintervention/postintervention TeamSTEPPS Benchmarks test and a retrospective preintervention/postintervention TeamSTEPPS teamwork attitudes questionnaire. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and repeated measures analysis of variance. Results Thirty-one students (18 in-person, 13 online) completed preintervention/postintervention surveys, tests and questionnaires. Gender, age and exposure to interprofessional education, teamwork training and games were similar between groups. There were no statistical differences in preintervention knowledge or teamwork attitude scores between in-person and online groups. Postintervention knowledge scores increased significantly from baseline (+2.0% p=0.047), and these gains did not differ significantly based on whether participants received in-person versus online training (+1.5% vs +2.9%; p=0.49). Teamwork attitudes scores also showed a statistically significant increase with training (+0.9, p<0.01) with no difference in the effect of training by group (+0.8 vs +1.0; p=0.64). Conclusions Graduating medical students who received in-person and online teamwork training showed similar increases in TeamSTEPPS knowledge and attitudes. Online simulations may be used to teach and reinforce team communication skills when in-person, interprofessional simulations are not feasible.
TeamSTEPPS在线模拟:扩大医学生团队合作训练的机会
提高绩效和患者安全的团队策略和工具(TeamSTEPPS)计划是一种基于证据的团队培训方法。对医学生进行面对面教育并不总是可行的。本研究的目的是评估在线互动TeamSTEPPS模拟与现场模拟对医学生TeamSTEPPS知识和态度的影响。方法四年级医学生自行选择参加面对面或在线培训,以教授和评估团队合作技能。现场参与者接受了教学课程、基于团队的医疗模拟和便利的汇报会议。在线组接受了等效的在线教学课程,并参与了基于软件的交互式模拟,并获得了即时、个性化的基于表现的反馈和脚本化的汇报。两种训练都使用了感染性休克病例的三次迭代,每一次都增加了医疗复杂性。参与者完成了人口统计调查、干预前/干预后TeamSTEPPS基准测试和回顾性干预前/干预后TeamSTEPPS团队态度问卷。数据分析采用描述性统计和重复测量方差分析。结果31名学生(18人面对面,13人在线)完成了干预前/干预后调查、测试和问卷。性别、年龄、跨专业教育、团队合作训练和游戏的暴露程度在两组之间是相似的。现场组和在线组在干预前知识和团队合作态度得分上没有统计学差异。干预后的知识得分较基线显著增加(+2.0% p=0.047),并且这些增益与参与者是否接受面对面培训和在线培训没有显著差异(+1.5% vs +2.9%;p = 0.49)。团队合作态度得分随训练的增加也有统计学意义(+0.9,p<0.01),组间训练效果无差异(+0.8 vs +1.0;p = 0.64)。结论接受过现场和在线团队合作培训的医学生在TeamSTEPPS知识和态度上有相似的提高。当面对面的跨专业模拟不可行时,在线模拟可以用来教授和加强团队沟通技巧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信