Efficacy of Autologous Blood Clot in Primary Pterygium Excision Compared with Suture Technique

Tanuja Tanzin, Md Iftekher Iqbal
{"title":"Efficacy of Autologous Blood Clot in Primary Pterygium Excision Compared with Suture Technique","authors":"Tanuja Tanzin, Md Iftekher Iqbal","doi":"10.3329/jcmcta.v31i1.65863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To assess the efficacy of pterygium excision and conjunctival autograft surgery among patients underwent autologous blood clot or using sutures (10-0 monofilament nylon).    \nMaterials and methods: A randomized controlled trial was done at Department of Ophthalmology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, with a study period from February 2017 to November 2018 was conducted with 60 eyes from 60 patients having primary nasal pterygium. They were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomized into two groups for conjunctival autograft. Group A (30) was treated with autologous blood clot and Group B (30) was treated with sutures (10-0 monofilament nylon). All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon at single center. Standard examinations were performed preoperatively and postoperatively, preoperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated and compared statistically where follow up was done at 1st day,7th days, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month post operation. The mainoutcome variables were postoperative discomfort, graft stability and complications.   \nResults: This study included 60 patients (60 eyes) with a mean age of 46.77±7.04 (SD) (Range 33 to 58 years) in Group A (30) and 46.17±7.53 (SD) (Range 22 to 58 years) in Group B (30). In Group A, male was 22 (73.3%) and female was 8 (26.7%) where Group Bcontained male 20 (66.7%) and female 10 (33.3%). Follow-up at 1st and 7th post operation days showed marked discomfort in Group B (Mean rank 41.82 and 40.62) compared to Group A (Mean rank 19.18 and 20.38) respectively (p<0.001). At 1st post operation day there were 3 (10%) graft retraction in Group Aonly. Within 6 months follow-up, all grafts were stable and there wasonly 1 (3.3%) granuloma in Group B.   \nConclusion: In primary pterygium excision, autologous blood clot showed excellent post- operative outcomes with much comfort, more stableas well as fewer complications. So, it appears to be an effective means to treat primary pterygium surgically. \nJCMCTA 2020 ; 31 (1) : 42-47","PeriodicalId":93458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chittagong Medical College Teachers' Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jcmcta.v31i1.65863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess the efficacy of pterygium excision and conjunctival autograft surgery among patients underwent autologous blood clot or using sutures (10-0 monofilament nylon).    Materials and methods: A randomized controlled trial was done at Department of Ophthalmology, Chittagong Medical College Hospital, with a study period from February 2017 to November 2018 was conducted with 60 eyes from 60 patients having primary nasal pterygium. They were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria and randomized into two groups for conjunctival autograft. Group A (30) was treated with autologous blood clot and Group B (30) was treated with sutures (10-0 monofilament nylon). All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon at single center. Standard examinations were performed preoperatively and postoperatively, preoperative and postoperative outcomes were evaluated and compared statistically where follow up was done at 1st day,7th days, 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month post operation. The mainoutcome variables were postoperative discomfort, graft stability and complications.   Results: This study included 60 patients (60 eyes) with a mean age of 46.77±7.04 (SD) (Range 33 to 58 years) in Group A (30) and 46.17±7.53 (SD) (Range 22 to 58 years) in Group B (30). In Group A, male was 22 (73.3%) and female was 8 (26.7%) where Group Bcontained male 20 (66.7%) and female 10 (33.3%). Follow-up at 1st and 7th post operation days showed marked discomfort in Group B (Mean rank 41.82 and 40.62) compared to Group A (Mean rank 19.18 and 20.38) respectively (p<0.001). At 1st post operation day there were 3 (10%) graft retraction in Group Aonly. Within 6 months follow-up, all grafts were stable and there wasonly 1 (3.3%) granuloma in Group B.   Conclusion: In primary pterygium excision, autologous blood clot showed excellent post- operative outcomes with much comfort, more stableas well as fewer complications. So, it appears to be an effective means to treat primary pterygium surgically. JCMCTA 2020 ; 31 (1) : 42-47
自体血凝块在原发性翼状胬肉切除术中的应用与缝合术的比较
背景:评估自体血块或缝合线(10-0单丝尼龙)患者翼状胬肉切除和自体结膜移植手术的疗效。材料与方法:在吉大港医学院附属医院眼科进行随机对照试验,研究期为2017年2月至2018年11月,选取60例原发性鼻翼状胬肉患者60只眼。根据纳入和排除标准,随机分为两组进行自体结膜移植。A组(30例)采用自体血凝块治疗,B组(30例)采用缝线(10-0单丝尼龙)治疗。所有手术均由一名外科医生在单一中心完成。术前、术后均进行标准检查,分别于术后第1天、第7天、1个月、3个月、6个月随访,评估术前、术后结局并进行统计学比较。主要预后变量为术后不适、移植物稳定性和并发症。结果:a组患者60例(60眼),平均年龄46.77±7.04 (SD)(33 ~ 58岁);B组患者30例(46.17±7.53 (SD)(22 ~ 58岁)。A组男性22例(73.3%),女性8例(26.7%);b组男性20例(66.7%),女性10例(33.3%)。术后第1天、第7天随访时,B组不适程度明显高于A组(平均评分为19.18、20.38)(p<0.001)。术后第1天,仅a组有3例(10%)移植物牵回。随访6个月,所有移植物均稳定,b组仅有1例(3.3%)肉芽肿。结论:自体血凝块在原发性胬肉切除术中,术后效果良好,舒适,稳定,并发症少。因此,手术治疗原发性翼状胬肉是一种有效的方法。Jcmcta 2020;31 (1): 42-47
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信