The Management of Social Anxiety: More Than 25 Years Later, Where are we?

Q2 Social Sciences
Amani ElBarazi, Pierre Meshreky
{"title":"The Management of Social Anxiety: More Than 25 Years Later, Where are we?","authors":"Amani ElBarazi, Pierre Meshreky","doi":"10.1177/10541373221118645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Behavioral and cognitive therapies are today the most effective toolbox and the most evidenced-based therapy for social anxiety. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of some of the most popular methods for treating social anxiety. A selective review of literature published between 1997 and 2022 on social anxiety management. We have found that the majority of behavioral and cognitive treatment protocols are based on the following pillars: exposure to avoided situations, cognitive restructuring, assertiveness, and social skills training, as well as decentration techniques such as getting out of self-observation and cognitive fusion. Several psychotherapists agree on some components of social anxiety management while others do not. Within these agreements and disagreements, the path to the sketch of a new model should open. We argue that some techniques may ultimately be useless, counterproductive, and time-consuming. Alter the existing models and improve them in a different way in light of the multiple information and clinical examples is much needed. We suggest reconfiguring the theoretical and clinical elements to derive a new therapeutic combination of old techniques. In this new theoretical model of social anxiety, we scrupulously suggest including the cognitive and emotional elements and opt for primacy to be given to behavioral inhibition and the role of the biological part such as amygdala.","PeriodicalId":39747,"journal":{"name":"Illness Crisis and Loss","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Illness Crisis and Loss","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10541373221118645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Behavioral and cognitive therapies are today the most effective toolbox and the most evidenced-based therapy for social anxiety. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of some of the most popular methods for treating social anxiety. A selective review of literature published between 1997 and 2022 on social anxiety management. We have found that the majority of behavioral and cognitive treatment protocols are based on the following pillars: exposure to avoided situations, cognitive restructuring, assertiveness, and social skills training, as well as decentration techniques such as getting out of self-observation and cognitive fusion. Several psychotherapists agree on some components of social anxiety management while others do not. Within these agreements and disagreements, the path to the sketch of a new model should open. We argue that some techniques may ultimately be useless, counterproductive, and time-consuming. Alter the existing models and improve them in a different way in light of the multiple information and clinical examples is much needed. We suggest reconfiguring the theoretical and clinical elements to derive a new therapeutic combination of old techniques. In this new theoretical model of social anxiety, we scrupulously suggest including the cognitive and emotional elements and opt for primacy to be given to behavioral inhibition and the role of the biological part such as amygdala.
社交焦虑的管理:超过25年后,我们在哪里?
行为和认知疗法是当今治疗社交焦虑最有效的工具,也是最具证据基础的疗法。这篇文章的目的是概述一些最流行的治疗社交焦虑的方法。对1997年至2022年间发表的关于社交焦虑管理的文献进行了选择性回顾。我们发现大多数行为和认知治疗方案是基于以下支柱:暴露于避免的情况,认知重组,自信,社交技能训练,以及分散技术,如摆脱自我观察和认知融合。一些心理治疗师同意社交焦虑管理的一些组成部分,而另一些则不同意。在这些协议和分歧中,应该开辟一条通往新模式草图的道路。我们认为,一些技术最终可能是无用的、适得其反的、耗时的。根据多种信息和临床实例,改变现有模型并以不同的方式改进它们是非常必要的。我们建议重新配置理论和临床元素,以获得旧技术的新治疗组合。在这个新的社会焦虑理论模型中,我们谨慎地建议包括认知和情感因素,并选择优先考虑行为抑制和杏仁核等生物部分的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Illness Crisis and Loss
Illness Crisis and Loss Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: When dealing with issues of grief, crisis, or loss as a counselor, medical professional, or researcher, it can be difficult to find resources to help you in your work. Receiving the most current research on the latest topics in the field from Illness, Crisis & Loss can help. Illness, Crisis & Loss is the resource that furthers your understanding and knowledge of the psychosocial and ethical issues associated with life-threatening illness, traumatic human crises, grief, and loss.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信