China's Global Leadership Through G20 Compliance.

IF 3.4 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
John J Kirton, Alissa Xinhe Wang
{"title":"China's Global Leadership Through G20 Compliance.","authors":"John J Kirton, Alissa Xinhe Wang","doi":"10.1007/s41111-021-00177-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>What kind of leadership role is China playing in the G20? How has this leadership role evolved over time, particularly with the recent global crises created by the COVID-19 pandemic? In addition, will China's rising role in providing badly needed global public goods reinforce its rivalry with a declining US, present the opportunity of co-leading with its BRICS counterparts, or mediate and foster co-operative solutions among all? This study seeks to address these critical questions using quantitative analysis based on G20 compliance data since its start in 2008, and especially at the recent Osaka Summit in June 2019 and the emergency virtual summit on March 26, 2020. Specifically, this study analyses China's changing compliance levels over time and across issue areas, in comparison with its key G20 partners (or rivals): the US, India and Russia. Observing China's compliance trends alongside those of other major G20 powers provides important insights into the characteristics, evolution and interactions of China's leadership. This analysis finds that China's leadership role has increased over time but that China remains largely a flexible and co-operative leader. From 2008 to 2018, China's compliance rose while that of the US declined. Overall, China leads more with its BRICS partners than with the US. China's leadership model has been characterized by flexibility and cooperativeness, as China has never led alone, and China's closest compliance companions vary across different issue areas. China and other G20 members' compliance in 2020 largely confirms these trends and the causal strength of the shock activated vulnerability of COVID-19 and members' relevant specialized capabilities in response.</p>","PeriodicalId":44455,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Political Science Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-41"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7953376/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-021-00177-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What kind of leadership role is China playing in the G20? How has this leadership role evolved over time, particularly with the recent global crises created by the COVID-19 pandemic? In addition, will China's rising role in providing badly needed global public goods reinforce its rivalry with a declining US, present the opportunity of co-leading with its BRICS counterparts, or mediate and foster co-operative solutions among all? This study seeks to address these critical questions using quantitative analysis based on G20 compliance data since its start in 2008, and especially at the recent Osaka Summit in June 2019 and the emergency virtual summit on March 26, 2020. Specifically, this study analyses China's changing compliance levels over time and across issue areas, in comparison with its key G20 partners (or rivals): the US, India and Russia. Observing China's compliance trends alongside those of other major G20 powers provides important insights into the characteristics, evolution and interactions of China's leadership. This analysis finds that China's leadership role has increased over time but that China remains largely a flexible and co-operative leader. From 2008 to 2018, China's compliance rose while that of the US declined. Overall, China leads more with its BRICS partners than with the US. China's leadership model has been characterized by flexibility and cooperativeness, as China has never led alone, and China's closest compliance companions vary across different issue areas. China and other G20 members' compliance in 2020 largely confirms these trends and the causal strength of the shock activated vulnerability of COVID-19 and members' relevant specialized capabilities in response.

中国通过G20合规发挥全球领导作用。
中国在G20中发挥了怎样的领导作用?随着时间的推移,这一领导作用是如何演变的,特别是在最近COVID-19大流行造成的全球危机中?此外,中国在提供急需的全球公共产品方面发挥的日益重要的作用,是否会加强其与日益衰落的美国的竞争,为与金砖国家同行共同领导提供机会,还是在所有国家之间进行调解和促进合作解决方案?本研究旨在通过基于2008年开始的G20合规数据的定量分析,特别是在2019年6月的大阪峰会和2020年3月26日的紧急虚拟峰会上,解决这些关键问题。具体而言,本研究分析了中国与其G20主要合作伙伴(或竞争对手):美国、印度和俄罗斯的合规水平随时间和问题领域的变化。观察中国与G20其他主要国家的合规趋势,有助于深入了解中国领导力的特征、演变和互动。这一分析发现,中国的领导作用随着时间的推移而增强,但中国在很大程度上仍然是一个灵活和合作的领导者。从2008年到2018年,中国的合规率上升,而美国的合规率下降。总体而言,中国与金砖国家伙伴的合作比与美国的合作更重要。中国的领导模式的特点是灵活和合作,因为中国从来没有单独领导过,中国最亲密的合作伙伴在不同的问题领域各不相同。中国和其他二十国集团成员在2020年的履约情况在很大程度上证实了这些趋势,也证实了新冠肺炎冲击引发的脆弱性和成员相关专业应对能力的因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: This journal aims to publish original and cutting-edge research in all areas of political science, such as political theory, comparative politics, international relations, public administration, public policy, methodology, and Chinese politics and government. In the meantime it also provides a major and visible platform for the intellectual dialogue between Chinese and international scholars, and disseminate scholarship that can shed light on the ever changing field of Chinese political studies, stimulate reflective discourse as the field continues to develop both within and outside China. All research articles published in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review. In additional original research articles, Chinese Political Science Review also publishes book reviews to disseminate comprehensive reviews of emerging topics in all areas of political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信