Sprawiedliwość reprodukcyjna – od feministycznego postulatu do naukowej koncepcji

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Avant Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.26913/avant.2020.03.18
Krystyna Dzwonkowska-Godula
{"title":"Sprawiedliwość reprodukcyjna – od feministycznego postulatu do naukowej koncepcji","authors":"Krystyna Dzwonkowska-Godula","doi":"10.26913/avant.2020.03.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In the 1990s, a group of feminists of colour in the United States, recognising that the actions taken so far to promote women's rights represented the interests of white rich mid-dle-class Americans, proposed a concept of “reproductive justice” and fought for the reproductive rights of marginalized social groups (including women from ethnic minorities, women with low social status and transgender people). This concept was created by combining the idea of reproductive rights with social justice. It advocates equality and the abolition of divisions between the privileged and the disadvantaged in deciding about their own bodies, pro-creation and family life. “Reproductive justice” means the right and conditions to have children or not, control over the conditions of childbirth, as well as parenting children in safe and sustainable communities. The aim of the article is to consider how the concept of reproductive justice can be applied in the scientific description and study of social reality. It seems that several different dimensions of its scientific ”usefulness” can be discussed. Firstly, the article points to reproductive rights as significant for the social status of individuals. It raises questions of what reproductive rights are granted and to whom and what social consequences derive from their possession/non-pos-session for individuals and entire social categories. Secondly, as an intersectional approach, it inspires the analysis of social inequalities and discriminatory practices in the field of reproductive rights in order to study the impact of different social characteristics of individuals on their access to these rights. Thirdly, this concept encourages research into the relationship between experiences of individuals, their social affiliation, the macro-social context and issues of subjectivity and agency in the area of reproduction. Fourthly, by pointing to the problem of privilege and discrimination in the field of reproduction, the concept inspires us to ask questions about who, why and how creates these social divisions and who benefs from reproductive injustice.","PeriodicalId":43453,"journal":{"name":"Avant","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avant","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26913/avant.2020.03.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: In the 1990s, a group of feminists of colour in the United States, recognising that the actions taken so far to promote women's rights represented the interests of white rich mid-dle-class Americans, proposed a concept of “reproductive justice” and fought for the reproductive rights of marginalized social groups (including women from ethnic minorities, women with low social status and transgender people). This concept was created by combining the idea of reproductive rights with social justice. It advocates equality and the abolition of divisions between the privileged and the disadvantaged in deciding about their own bodies, pro-creation and family life. “Reproductive justice” means the right and conditions to have children or not, control over the conditions of childbirth, as well as parenting children in safe and sustainable communities. The aim of the article is to consider how the concept of reproductive justice can be applied in the scientific description and study of social reality. It seems that several different dimensions of its scientific ”usefulness” can be discussed. Firstly, the article points to reproductive rights as significant for the social status of individuals. It raises questions of what reproductive rights are granted and to whom and what social consequences derive from their possession/non-pos-session for individuals and entire social categories. Secondly, as an intersectional approach, it inspires the analysis of social inequalities and discriminatory practices in the field of reproductive rights in order to study the impact of different social characteristics of individuals on their access to these rights. Thirdly, this concept encourages research into the relationship between experiences of individuals, their social affiliation, the macro-social context and issues of subjectivity and agency in the area of reproduction. Fourthly, by pointing to the problem of privilege and discrimination in the field of reproduction, the concept inspires us to ask questions about who, why and how creates these social divisions and who benefs from reproductive injustice.
: 20世纪90年代,美国一群有色人种女权主义者认识到迄今为止促进妇女权利的行动代表了美国富裕的白人中产阶级的利益,提出了“生殖正义”的概念,并为边缘社会群体(包括少数民族妇女、社会地位低下的妇女和变性人)的生殖权利而斗争。这一概念是将生殖权利与社会正义相结合而产生的。它提倡平等,并废除特权阶层和弱势阶层在决定自己的身体、赞成创造和家庭生活方面的分歧。“生殖正义”是指生育或不生育的权利和条件,对生育条件的控制,以及在安全和可持续的社区养育子女。本文的目的是考虑如何将生殖正义的概念应用于对社会现实的科学描述和研究。它的科学“有用性”的几个不同方面似乎可以讨论。首先,文章指出生殖权利对个人的社会地位具有重要意义。它提出了下列问题:授予何种生殖权利,授予谁,对个人和整个社会类别来说,拥有/不拥有这些权利会产生何种社会后果。其次,作为一种交叉方法,它激发了对生殖权利领域的社会不平等和歧视性做法的分析,以研究个人的不同社会特征对其获得这些权利的影响。第三,这一概念鼓励研究个人经验、社会从属关系、宏观社会背景和再生产领域的主体性和能动性问题之间的关系。第四,通过指出生殖领域的特权和歧视问题,这一概念激励我们提出这样的问题:是谁、为什么以及如何造成这些社会分裂,以及谁从生殖不公正中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Avant
Avant HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信