Can Teacher Education Save Democracy?

Joel Westheimer
{"title":"Can Teacher Education Save Democracy?","authors":"Joel Westheimer","doi":"10.1177/01614681221086773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/context: </strong>Social scientists, policymakers, and commentators have long assumed that Western democracies enjoy relative stability because of deep commitments to a culture of democratic governance. But those commitments are quickly fading in almost every developed and developing democracy around the globe. In the same period in which support for democracy has declined, schools and teacher education programs have been pressured by \"accountability\" measures and economic austerity to focus on math and literacy achievement to the exclusion of nearly every other educational goal. These challenges to social cohesion and democratic governance highlight the need for young people to be exposed early on and throughout their educational pathways to the knowledge, skills, and dispositions consistent with democratic life. The narrowing of curricular goals, therefore, is a threat to the stability of democratic institutions.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This essay examines the potential of teacher education as a lever for change. How might teacher educators ensure that teachers are prepared to foster education that will sustain and strengthen democratic norms? If schools have an essential role to play in preparing students for informed engagement in civic and political life, how can we best prepare teachers to advance those goals?</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This is an analytical essay drawing on recent empirical research on declining support for democratic values and on teachers' civic engagement as well as conceptual work on democratic education goals. To illustrate the potential for teacher education to prepare teachers to engage students in political issues discussions, I draw on data from the first large-scale empirical study of what U.S. high school teachers currently do to prepare youth to understand economic inequality and its causes, effects, and possible remedies. The study included a teacher survey and follow-up interviews concerning teachers' political ideology and civic and political engagement as well as classroom practice. The 2,750 teachers who participated in the survey are representative of U.S. public schools (and an additional segment of U.S. elite independent schools) in terms of student demographics and geographic location. We also conducted 150 follow-up interviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/recommendations: </strong>I suggest that teacher education must move from reactive technocratic concerns for accountability and standardization to broader civic and civil commitments to the foundations of democratic community, pluralism, and relationship. Teacher education programs should consider ways to encourage new and experienced teachers to follow the news, engage in civil discourse with one another about topics of public concern, and participate in civic and political life. Moreover, teacher educators could work toward teaching the knowledge, skills, and dispositions associated with political and civic engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":22248,"journal":{"name":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","volume":"27 1","pages":"42-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13021050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681221086773","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/context: Social scientists, policymakers, and commentators have long assumed that Western democracies enjoy relative stability because of deep commitments to a culture of democratic governance. But those commitments are quickly fading in almost every developed and developing democracy around the globe. In the same period in which support for democracy has declined, schools and teacher education programs have been pressured by "accountability" measures and economic austerity to focus on math and literacy achievement to the exclusion of nearly every other educational goal. These challenges to social cohesion and democratic governance highlight the need for young people to be exposed early on and throughout their educational pathways to the knowledge, skills, and dispositions consistent with democratic life. The narrowing of curricular goals, therefore, is a threat to the stability of democratic institutions.

Purpose: This essay examines the potential of teacher education as a lever for change. How might teacher educators ensure that teachers are prepared to foster education that will sustain and strengthen democratic norms? If schools have an essential role to play in preparing students for informed engagement in civic and political life, how can we best prepare teachers to advance those goals?

Research design: This is an analytical essay drawing on recent empirical research on declining support for democratic values and on teachers' civic engagement as well as conceptual work on democratic education goals. To illustrate the potential for teacher education to prepare teachers to engage students in political issues discussions, I draw on data from the first large-scale empirical study of what U.S. high school teachers currently do to prepare youth to understand economic inequality and its causes, effects, and possible remedies. The study included a teacher survey and follow-up interviews concerning teachers' political ideology and civic and political engagement as well as classroom practice. The 2,750 teachers who participated in the survey are representative of U.S. public schools (and an additional segment of U.S. elite independent schools) in terms of student demographics and geographic location. We also conducted 150 follow-up interviews.

Conclusions/recommendations: I suggest that teacher education must move from reactive technocratic concerns for accountability and standardization to broader civic and civil commitments to the foundations of democratic community, pluralism, and relationship. Teacher education programs should consider ways to encourage new and experienced teachers to follow the news, engage in civil discourse with one another about topics of public concern, and participate in civic and political life. Moreover, teacher educators could work toward teaching the knowledge, skills, and dispositions associated with political and civic engagement.

Abstract Image

教师教育能拯救民主吗?
背景/背景:社会科学家、政策制定者和评论家长期以来一直认为,西方民主国家享有相对稳定的原因是对民主治理文化的深刻承诺。但在全球几乎所有发达和发展中的民主国家,这些承诺正在迅速消退。在对民主的支持下降的同一时期,学校和教师教育项目受到“问责制”措施和经济紧缩的压力,不得不把重点放在数学和识字成绩上,而忽略了几乎所有其他教育目标。这些对社会凝聚力和民主治理的挑战突出表明,年轻人需要在早期和整个教育过程中接触与民主生活相一致的知识、技能和性格。因此,课程目标的缩小是对民主体制稳定的威胁。目的:本文探讨了教师教育作为变革杠杆的潜力。教师教育工作者如何确保教师准备好促进能够维持和加强民主规范的教育?如果学校在培养学生在知情的情况下参与公民和政治生活方面发挥着至关重要的作用,那么我们如何才能最好地培养教师来推进这些目标?研究设计:这是一篇分析性文章,借鉴了最近关于民主价值观支持率下降、教师公民参与以及民主教育目标概念性工作的实证研究。为了说明教师教育在培养教师使学生参与政治问题讨论方面的潜力,我利用了美国高中教师目前在培养年轻人理解经济不平等及其原因、影响和可能补救措施方面所做的第一次大规模实证研究的数据。本研究包括对教师的调查和随访访谈,内容涉及教师的政治意识形态、公民和政治参与以及课堂实践。参与调查的2750名教师在学生人数和地理位置方面代表了美国公立学校(以及美国精英私立学校的一部分)。我们还进行了150次后续访谈。结论/建议:我建议教师教育必须从对问责制和标准化的被动技术官僚关注转向对民主社区、多元化和关系基础的更广泛的公民和公民承诺。教师教育项目应考虑鼓励新教师和有经验的教师关注新闻,就公众关注的话题相互参与民间讨论,并参与公民和政治生活。此外,教师教育者可以努力教授与政治和公民参与相关的知识、技能和性格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书