The influence of financial reporting quality and audit quality on investment efficiency

IF 4.3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
F. Shahzad, I. Rehman, Waqas Hanif, Ghazanfar Ali Asim, Mushahid Hussain Baig
{"title":"The influence of financial reporting quality and audit quality on investment efficiency","authors":"F. Shahzad, I. Rehman, Waqas Hanif, Ghazanfar Ali Asim, Mushahid Hussain Baig","doi":"10.1108/ijaim-08-2018-0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to empirically investigate the effect of financial reporting quality (FRQ) and audit quality (AQ) on the investment efficiency (IE) for the firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange during the period 2007-2014.\n\n\nDesign/methodology\nThe authors use pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regression which cluster at the firm and year level to test the hypotheses. For sensitivity check, the authors also account for reverse causality and cross-sectional dependence by using the GMM and FGLS regression methods. Furthermore, the authors built their theoretical arguments based on alignment hypothesis of the agency theory and resource-based view of the firm.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings suggest that higher FRQ and AQ are associated with higher IE. The results for these particular estimates are robust when tested using alternative estimation techniques. Overall, the outcomes of this study are in line with the arguments presented by the alignment hypothesis of the agency theory and resource-based view of the firm.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study is fruitful for policymakers’ and investors. This study finds that the audit done by the Big 4 also reduces the information gap and, thus, reduces the moral hazard and adverse selection problems, thereby enhancing the IE.\n\n\nOriginality\nThe authors extend the debate on determinates of IE and highlight two monitoring mechanisms: FRQ and AQ. The authors further extend the literature on the economic consequences of AQ in terms of IE, as proposed by Francis (2011). For the first time, this study investigates the impact of AQ on IE in a setting where minority shareholder risk of exploitation is high relative to other markets in Asia.\n","PeriodicalId":46371,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting and Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijaim-08-2018-0097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to empirically investigate the effect of financial reporting quality (FRQ) and audit quality (AQ) on the investment efficiency (IE) for the firms listed on the Pakistan Stock Exchange during the period 2007-2014. Design/methodology The authors use pooled ordinary least squares (OLS) regression which cluster at the firm and year level to test the hypotheses. For sensitivity check, the authors also account for reverse causality and cross-sectional dependence by using the GMM and FGLS regression methods. Furthermore, the authors built their theoretical arguments based on alignment hypothesis of the agency theory and resource-based view of the firm. Findings The findings suggest that higher FRQ and AQ are associated with higher IE. The results for these particular estimates are robust when tested using alternative estimation techniques. Overall, the outcomes of this study are in line with the arguments presented by the alignment hypothesis of the agency theory and resource-based view of the firm. Practical implications This study is fruitful for policymakers’ and investors. This study finds that the audit done by the Big 4 also reduces the information gap and, thus, reduces the moral hazard and adverse selection problems, thereby enhancing the IE. Originality The authors extend the debate on determinates of IE and highlight two monitoring mechanisms: FRQ and AQ. The authors further extend the literature on the economic consequences of AQ in terms of IE, as proposed by Francis (2011). For the first time, this study investigates the impact of AQ on IE in a setting where minority shareholder risk of exploitation is high relative to other markets in Asia.
财务报告质量和审计质量对投资效率的影响
本研究旨在实证研究2007-2014年期间巴基斯坦证券交易所上市公司财务报告质量(FRQ)和审计质量(AQ)对投资效率(IE)的影响。设计/方法作者使用汇集普通最小二乘(OLS)回归,该回归在公司和年度水平上聚类来检验假设。为了进行敏感性检验,作者还使用GMM和FGLS回归方法考虑了反向因果关系和横截面相关性。在此基础上,构建了代理理论的趋同假说和企业资源基础观。研究结果表明,较高的FRQ和AQ与较高的IE相关。当使用其他估计技术进行测试时,这些特定估计的结果是稳健的。总体而言,本研究的结果与代理理论的对齐假设和企业资源基础观所提出的论点是一致的。本研究对政策制定者和投资者都有借鉴意义。本研究发现,四大会计师事务所的审计也减少了信息差距,从而减少了道德风险和逆向选择问题,从而提高了IE。原创性作者扩展了对IE决定因素的争论,并强调了两种监测机制:FRQ和AQ。作者进一步扩展了Francis(2011)提出的关于AQ对IE经济后果的文献。本研究首次探讨了相对于亚洲其他市场,少数股东被剥削的风险较高的背景下,企业素质对企业绩效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Accounting & Information Management focuses on publishing research in accounting, finance, and information management. It specifically emphasizes the interaction between these research areas on an international scale and within both the private and public sectors. The aim of the journal is to bridge the knowledge gap between researchers and practitioners by covering various issues that arise in the field. These include information systems, accounting information management, innovation and technology in accounting, accounting standards and reporting, and capital market efficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信