Current risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a systematic review of epidemiological studies

E. Lynch, Ryan C DeCoster, Krishna S. Vyas, B. Rinker, Mei Yang, H. Vásconez, M. Clemens
{"title":"Current risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a systematic review of epidemiological studies","authors":"E. Lynch, Ryan C DeCoster, Krishna S. Vyas, B. Rinker, Mei Yang, H. Vásconez, M. Clemens","doi":"10.21037/abs-20-96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent epidemiological studies have attempted to accurately determine the risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). However, comparisons of previously published works are difficult due to widespread variations in reporting. We systematically review the epidemiology in order to better define the current risk of BIA-ALCL. Herein, we report the global epidemiology with an emphasis on the U.S. breast implant population while simultaneously assessing the oncologic safety of smooth-surface devices. In the current manuscript, a systematic review of PubMed and other scientific databases, as well as the grey literature, was conducted for epidemiologic studies on BIA-ALCL. Using analytical and descriptive epidemiology, we estimated the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of BIA-ALCL using a standardized approach. Cumulative incidence was reported at implant and patient-specific levels. The patient-specific cumulative risk within the U.S. market ranges from 1.79 per 1,000 (1:559) to 2.82 per 1,000 (1:355) patients with a textured implant. The implant-specific risk of Allergan textured devices ranges from 1:602–871 to 1:8,500, while the risk of commercially available Mentor Siltex implants is 1:50,000. No epidemiological study or regulatory agency reported a case of BIA-ALCL occurring exclusively with a smooth device. As such, with the removal of Allergan textured breast devices, this study demonstrates substantial gaps in the epidemiological knowledge of BIA-ALCL, including the current risk of commercially available textured breast implants in the U.S. market. Although the risk of BIA-ALCL is low, surgeons should exercise extreme caution when considering the use of a textured breast device for cosmetic or reconstructive purposes.","PeriodicalId":72212,"journal":{"name":"Annals of breast surgery : an open access journal to bridge breast surgeons across the world","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of breast surgery : an open access journal to bridge breast surgeons across the world","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/abs-20-96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Recent epidemiological studies have attempted to accurately determine the risk of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL). However, comparisons of previously published works are difficult due to widespread variations in reporting. We systematically review the epidemiology in order to better define the current risk of BIA-ALCL. Herein, we report the global epidemiology with an emphasis on the U.S. breast implant population while simultaneously assessing the oncologic safety of smooth-surface devices. In the current manuscript, a systematic review of PubMed and other scientific databases, as well as the grey literature, was conducted for epidemiologic studies on BIA-ALCL. Using analytical and descriptive epidemiology, we estimated the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of BIA-ALCL using a standardized approach. Cumulative incidence was reported at implant and patient-specific levels. The patient-specific cumulative risk within the U.S. market ranges from 1.79 per 1,000 (1:559) to 2.82 per 1,000 (1:355) patients with a textured implant. The implant-specific risk of Allergan textured devices ranges from 1:602–871 to 1:8,500, while the risk of commercially available Mentor Siltex implants is 1:50,000. No epidemiological study or regulatory agency reported a case of BIA-ALCL occurring exclusively with a smooth device. As such, with the removal of Allergan textured breast devices, this study demonstrates substantial gaps in the epidemiological knowledge of BIA-ALCL, including the current risk of commercially available textured breast implants in the U.S. market. Although the risk of BIA-ALCL is low, surgeons should exercise extreme caution when considering the use of a textured breast device for cosmetic or reconstructive purposes.
目前乳房植入物相关间变性大细胞淋巴瘤的风险:流行病学研究的系统回顾
最近的流行病学研究试图准确地确定乳房植入物相关间变性大细胞淋巴瘤(BIA-ALCL)的风险。然而,由于报道的广泛差异,很难对以前发表的作品进行比较。为了更好地定义BIA-ALCL的当前风险,我们系统地回顾了流行病学。在此,我们报告了全球流行病学,重点是美国乳房植入物人群,同时评估光滑表面装置的肿瘤学安全性。在当前的手稿中,系统地回顾了PubMed和其他科学数据库,以及灰色文献,对BIA-ALCL进行了流行病学研究。使用分析和描述流行病学,我们使用标准化方法估计BIA-ALCL的累积发病率和发病率。累积发病率在种植体和患者特异性水平上均有报道。在美国市场上,有纹理植入物患者的累积风险为1.79 / 1000(1:559)至2.82 / 1000(1:355)。艾尔建纹理装置的植入物特异性风险范围从1:602-871到1:8 500,而市售的Mentor Siltex植入物的风险为1:5万。没有流行病学研究或监管机构报告BIA-ALCL病例只发生在光滑装置上。因此,随着艾尔建纹理隆胸装置的移除,本研究表明BIA-ALCL的流行病学知识存在实质性差距,包括目前美国市场上商用纹理隆胸植入物的风险。尽管BIA-ALCL的风险很低,但外科医生在考虑使用有纹理的乳房装置进行美容或重建时应非常谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信