Scientific Approach to Planning and Implementation of Blind Refracturing in Horizontal Wells with MSF Completion in Low-Permeability Reservoirs

Almaz Makhmutovich Sadykov, S. Erastov, M. S. Antonov, D. Kashapov, T. Salakhov, A. S. Kardopoltsev, F. Leskin, Inna Alexandrovna Sakhipova, Alexander Nikolaevich Nedoseikin, N. M. Zorkaltsev, I. F. Agzamov
{"title":"Scientific Approach to Planning and Implementation of Blind Refracturing in Horizontal Wells with MSF Completion in Low-Permeability Reservoirs","authors":"Almaz Makhmutovich Sadykov, S. Erastov, M. S. Antonov, D. Kashapov, T. Salakhov, A. S. Kardopoltsev, F. Leskin, Inna Alexandrovna Sakhipova, Alexander Nikolaevich Nedoseikin, N. M. Zorkaltsev, I. F. Agzamov","doi":"10.2118/206406-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One of the fundamental methods of developing low-permeability reservoirs is the use of multi-stage hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells. Decreasing wells productivity requires geological and technical measures, where one of the methods is \"blind\" refracturing. Often, only one \"blind\" hydraulic fracturing is carried out for all ports of multistage hydraulic fracturing, the possibility of carrying out two or more stages of \"blind\" hydraulic fracturing is considered in this article.\n The purpose of the article is to increase the productivity of horizontal wells with multi-stage hydraulic fracturing by the \"blind\" refracturing method. A one-stage and two-stage approach was implemented when planning and performing \"blind\" hydraulic fracturing with analysis of treatment pressures, indicating a possibility for reorientation of the fracture during the second stage in a horizontal wellbore.\n Based on the experience of the \"blind\" hydraulic fracturing performed at the Kondinskoye field, \"NK \"Kondaneft\" JSC carried out pilot work on \"blind\" refracturing at four horizontal wells of the Zapadno -Erginskoye field. A geomechanical model was used, built based on well logging and core studies carried out at \"RN-BashNIPIneft\" LLC. The total mass of the planned proppant per well was 280-290 tons, while this tonnage was pumped in one or more stages. A one-stage \"blind\" refracturing approach was successfully performed in one well, two-stage hydraulic fracturing was implemented in three wells, where in one of the wells, after two stages to open ports, initial hydraulic fracturing was also carried out to the last, previously non-activated port. In the case of two-stage hydraulic fracturing, the first stage purpose was to saturate the reservoir-fracture system with the injection of a \"sand plug\" with a high concentration of proppant at the end of the job to isolate the initial injectivity interval, determined based on the interpretation of well logging data and analysis of the wellhead treatment pressure. The second stage purpose was the initiation and possible reorientation of the fracture in a new interval, confirmed by an increase in surface pressure during hydraulic fracturing and instantaneous shut-in pressure.\n This article summarizes the results and lessons learned from the pilot works carried out using the geomechanical model and well productivity assessment before and after \"blind\" fracturing. The analysis of surface pressure based on production data indicating fracture reorientation is presented. The recommendations and accumulated experience presented in this work should increase the effectiveness of repeated \"blind\" refracturing in horizontal wells with multi-stage hydraulic fracturing.","PeriodicalId":11052,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, October 14, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/206406-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the fundamental methods of developing low-permeability reservoirs is the use of multi-stage hydraulic fracturing in horizontal wells. Decreasing wells productivity requires geological and technical measures, where one of the methods is "blind" refracturing. Often, only one "blind" hydraulic fracturing is carried out for all ports of multistage hydraulic fracturing, the possibility of carrying out two or more stages of "blind" hydraulic fracturing is considered in this article. The purpose of the article is to increase the productivity of horizontal wells with multi-stage hydraulic fracturing by the "blind" refracturing method. A one-stage and two-stage approach was implemented when planning and performing "blind" hydraulic fracturing with analysis of treatment pressures, indicating a possibility for reorientation of the fracture during the second stage in a horizontal wellbore. Based on the experience of the "blind" hydraulic fracturing performed at the Kondinskoye field, "NK "Kondaneft" JSC carried out pilot work on "blind" refracturing at four horizontal wells of the Zapadno -Erginskoye field. A geomechanical model was used, built based on well logging and core studies carried out at "RN-BashNIPIneft" LLC. The total mass of the planned proppant per well was 280-290 tons, while this tonnage was pumped in one or more stages. A one-stage "blind" refracturing approach was successfully performed in one well, two-stage hydraulic fracturing was implemented in three wells, where in one of the wells, after two stages to open ports, initial hydraulic fracturing was also carried out to the last, previously non-activated port. In the case of two-stage hydraulic fracturing, the first stage purpose was to saturate the reservoir-fracture system with the injection of a "sand plug" with a high concentration of proppant at the end of the job to isolate the initial injectivity interval, determined based on the interpretation of well logging data and analysis of the wellhead treatment pressure. The second stage purpose was the initiation and possible reorientation of the fracture in a new interval, confirmed by an increase in surface pressure during hydraulic fracturing and instantaneous shut-in pressure. This article summarizes the results and lessons learned from the pilot works carried out using the geomechanical model and well productivity assessment before and after "blind" fracturing. The analysis of surface pressure based on production data indicating fracture reorientation is presented. The recommendations and accumulated experience presented in this work should increase the effectiveness of repeated "blind" refracturing in horizontal wells with multi-stage hydraulic fracturing.
低渗透油藏MSF完井水平井盲重复压裂规划与实施的科学方法
水平井多级水力压裂是开发低渗透油藏的基本方法之一。降低油井产能需要采取地质和技术措施,其中一种方法是“盲”重复压裂。通常,多级水力压裂的所有端口只进行一次“盲”水力压裂,本文考虑了进行两级或多级“盲”水力压裂的可能性。本文的目的是通过“盲”重复压裂方法提高多级水力压裂水平井的产能。通过对处理压力的分析,在规划和实施“盲”水力压裂时,采用了一段和两段方法,表明在水平井筒的第二段中,裂缝有可能重新定向。基于在Kondinskoye油田进行“盲”水力压裂的经验,NK Kondaneft JSC在Zapadno -Erginskoye油田的4口水平井上进行了“盲”重复压裂的试验工作。根据在“RN-BashNIPIneft”LLC进行的测井和岩心研究,使用了地质力学模型。每口井计划的支撑剂总质量为280-290吨,而该吨位是分一个或多个阶段泵入的。在一口井中成功实施了一段“盲”重复压裂,在三口井中实施了两段水力压裂,其中一口井在两段打开端口后,也进行了初始水力压裂,直到最后一个未激活的端口。在两级水力压裂的情况下,第一阶段的目的是在作业结束时通过注入含有高浓度支撑剂的“砂塞”来使储层-裂缝系统饱和,以隔离初始注入间隔,这是根据测井数据的解释和井口处理压力的分析确定的。第二阶段的目的是在一个新的层段内启动并可能重新定向裂缝,水力压裂过程中地面压力的增加和瞬时关井压力的增加证实了这一点。本文总结了利用地质力学模型和“盲”压裂前后的井产能评估进行的试点工作的结果和经验教训。根据指示裂缝重新定向的生产数据,对地表压力进行了分析。本研究提出的建议和积累的经验将提高多级水力压裂水平井重复“盲”重复压裂的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信