Correlation of Ultrasonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight with Actual Birth Weight as Seen in a Private Specialist Hospital in South East Nigeria

C. Okafor, C. Okafor, I. Mbachu, Izuchukwu Christian Obionwu, M. Aronu
{"title":"Correlation of Ultrasonographic Estimation of Fetal Weight with Actual Birth Weight as Seen in a Private Specialist Hospital in South East Nigeria","authors":"C. Okafor, C. Okafor, I. Mbachu, Izuchukwu Christian Obionwu, M. Aronu","doi":"10.1155/2019/3693797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight at term provides vital information for the skilled birth attendants to make decisions on the possible best route of delivery of the fetus. This is more pertinent in a setting where women book late for antenatal care. Aim and Objectives The study evaluated the accuracy of estimation of fetal weight with ultrasound machine at term. Methods This was a cross sectional study conducted at a private specialist hospital in Nigeria. A coded questionnaire was used to retrieve relevant information which included the last menstrual period, gestational age, parity, and birth weight. Other information obtained includes Ultrasound-delivery interval, maternal weight, and route of delivery. The ultrasound was used to estimate the fetal weight. The actual birth weight was determined using a digital baby weighing scale. The data were inputted into Microsoft excel and analyzed using STATA version 14. Statistical significance was considered at p-values less than 0.05. Measures of accuracy evaluated in the statistical analysis included mean error, mean absolute error, mean percentage error, and mean absolute percentage error. Pearson correlation was done between the estimated ultrasound fetal weight and the actual birth weight. The proportion of estimates within ±10% of actual birth weight was also determined. Result A total of 170 pregnant women participated in the study. The mean maternal age was 30.77 years ± 5.54. The mean birth weight was 3.47 kg ± 0.47, while the mean estimated ultrasound weight was 3.43 kg ± 0.8. There was positive correlation between the ultrasound estimated weight and the actual birth weight. The mean ultrasound scan to delivery interval was 0.8 days (with range of 0–2 days). The study recorded a mean error of estimation of 41.17 grams and mean absolute error of 258.22 grams. The mean percentage error was 0.65%, while the mean absolute error of estimation was 7.56%. About 72.54% of the estimated weights were within 10% of the actual birth weight. Conclusion The ultrasound estimated fetal weight correlated with the actual birth weight. Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight should be done when indicated to aid the clinician in making decisions concerning routes of delivery.","PeriodicalId":14379,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive Medicine","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3693797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight at term provides vital information for the skilled birth attendants to make decisions on the possible best route of delivery of the fetus. This is more pertinent in a setting where women book late for antenatal care. Aim and Objectives The study evaluated the accuracy of estimation of fetal weight with ultrasound machine at term. Methods This was a cross sectional study conducted at a private specialist hospital in Nigeria. A coded questionnaire was used to retrieve relevant information which included the last menstrual period, gestational age, parity, and birth weight. Other information obtained includes Ultrasound-delivery interval, maternal weight, and route of delivery. The ultrasound was used to estimate the fetal weight. The actual birth weight was determined using a digital baby weighing scale. The data were inputted into Microsoft excel and analyzed using STATA version 14. Statistical significance was considered at p-values less than 0.05. Measures of accuracy evaluated in the statistical analysis included mean error, mean absolute error, mean percentage error, and mean absolute percentage error. Pearson correlation was done between the estimated ultrasound fetal weight and the actual birth weight. The proportion of estimates within ±10% of actual birth weight was also determined. Result A total of 170 pregnant women participated in the study. The mean maternal age was 30.77 years ± 5.54. The mean birth weight was 3.47 kg ± 0.47, while the mean estimated ultrasound weight was 3.43 kg ± 0.8. There was positive correlation between the ultrasound estimated weight and the actual birth weight. The mean ultrasound scan to delivery interval was 0.8 days (with range of 0–2 days). The study recorded a mean error of estimation of 41.17 grams and mean absolute error of 258.22 grams. The mean percentage error was 0.65%, while the mean absolute error of estimation was 7.56%. About 72.54% of the estimated weights were within 10% of the actual birth weight. Conclusion The ultrasound estimated fetal weight correlated with the actual birth weight. Ultrasound estimation of fetal weight should be done when indicated to aid the clinician in making decisions concerning routes of delivery.
超声估计胎儿体重与实际出生体重的相关性,在尼日利亚东南部一家私立专科医院看到
背景超声胎儿足月体重的估计提供了重要的信息,为熟练的助产士作出决定,在可能的最佳路线分娩胎儿。这在妇女预约产前护理较晚的情况下更为恰当。目的和目的评价超声仪对足月胎儿体重估计的准确性。方法在尼日利亚一家私立专科医院进行横断面研究。使用编码问卷检索相关信息,包括最后一次月经,胎龄,胎次和出生体重。获得的其他信息包括超声分娩间隔、产妇体重和分娩途径。超声用来估计胎儿的体重。婴儿的实际出生体重是用电子婴儿称来测定的。将数据输入到Microsoft excel中,并使用STATA version 14进行分析。p值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。在统计分析中评估准确性的措施包括平均误差、平均绝对误差、平均百分比误差和平均绝对百分比误差。在超声估计的胎儿体重和实际出生体重之间进行Pearson相关。还确定了在实际出生体重±10%范围内的估计值的比例。结果共有170名孕妇参与了本研究。产妇平均年龄30.77岁±5.54岁。平均出生体重为3.47 kg±0.47,超声估计平均体重为3.43 kg±0.8。超声估计体重与实际出生体重呈正相关。超声扫描至分娩的平均间隔时间为0.8天(范围为0-2天)。研究记录的平均估计误差为41.17克,平均绝对误差为258.22克。平均百分比误差为0.65%,估计的平均绝对误差为7.56%。约72.54%的估计体重与实际出生体重相差在10%以内。结论超声估计胎儿体重与实际出生体重具有相关性。超声估计胎儿体重应在指征时进行,以帮助临床医生作出有关分娩路线的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信