EU Citizenship as a Means of Broadening the Application of EU Fundamental Rights: Developments and Limits

Katerina Kalaitzaki
{"title":"EU Citizenship as a Means of Broadening the Application of EU Fundamental Rights: Developments and Limits","authors":"Katerina Kalaitzaki","doi":"10.1163/9789004433076_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter supports the idea that the political integration in the domain of EU fundamental rights is primarily evolving through a ‘triangular’, inter-connected system of protection, including the constructivist transformation of EU citizenship, the institutionalised developments of EU law, and the protection of fundamental rights as general principles of EU law. Yet major components of a comprehensive and all-embracing fundamental rights policy are still absent, which is even more perceptible during periods of crisis, such as the recent financial crisis, where the gaps in citizens’ rights protection became evident due to the difficulties encountered in challenging the consequences of the conditionality imposed. The article aims to fill these gaps, by establishing a connection between EU fundamental and EU citizenship rights, using the judicially developed ‘substance of the rights’ doctrine. Various attempts have taken place towards this aim, yet some loose ends remained that are largely encountered in the present article, through the establishment of a new jurisdictional test, which combines a dynamic reading of Art. 20 TFEU and the substance of the rights doctrine, Art. 2 TEU and fundamental rights as general principles of EU law, such as Art. 19 TEU.","PeriodicalId":81320,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown immigration law journal","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown immigration law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004433076_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter supports the idea that the political integration in the domain of EU fundamental rights is primarily evolving through a ‘triangular’, inter-connected system of protection, including the constructivist transformation of EU citizenship, the institutionalised developments of EU law, and the protection of fundamental rights as general principles of EU law. Yet major components of a comprehensive and all-embracing fundamental rights policy are still absent, which is even more perceptible during periods of crisis, such as the recent financial crisis, where the gaps in citizens’ rights protection became evident due to the difficulties encountered in challenging the consequences of the conditionality imposed. The article aims to fill these gaps, by establishing a connection between EU fundamental and EU citizenship rights, using the judicially developed ‘substance of the rights’ doctrine. Various attempts have taken place towards this aim, yet some loose ends remained that are largely encountered in the present article, through the establishment of a new jurisdictional test, which combines a dynamic reading of Art. 20 TFEU and the substance of the rights doctrine, Art. 2 TEU and fundamental rights as general principles of EU law, such as Art. 19 TEU.
欧盟公民身份作为扩大欧盟基本权利适用的手段:发展与局限
本章支持这样一种观点,即欧盟基本权利领域的政治一体化主要是通过一个“三角”的、相互关联的保护体系来发展的,包括欧盟公民身份的建构主义转变、欧盟法律的制度化发展,以及将基本权利保护作为欧盟法律的一般原则。然而,仍然缺乏一项全面和无所不包的基本权利政策的主要组成部分,这在危机期间更加明显,例如最近的金融危机,在危机期间,由于在挑战所施加的条件的后果方面遇到困难,公民权利保护方面的差距变得明显。本文旨在通过运用司法上发展的“权利实质”原则,建立欧盟基本权利和欧盟公民权之间的联系,来填补这些空白。为了实现这一目标,已经进行了各种尝试,然而,通过建立一种新的管辖权测试,将对第20条TFEU的动态解读与权利原则的实质(第2条TEU)和基本权利作为欧盟法律的一般原则(如第19条TEU)相结合,仍然存在一些松散的问题,这些问题在本文中主要遇到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信