Biomechanical behavior of the dental implant macrodesign in mandibular implant-supported overdentures

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
G. S. Okkan, Sercan Küçükkurt, S. Terzioğlu, N. Mollaoğlu
{"title":"Biomechanical behavior of the dental implant macrodesign in mandibular implant-supported overdentures","authors":"G. S. Okkan, Sercan Küçükkurt, S. Terzioğlu, N. Mollaoğlu","doi":"10.23805/JO.2021.13.04.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of different dental implant macrodesigns on the stress occurred on the implants and bone for two-implant-supported overdentures (IOD) in the rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles. \nMethods Six different implant brands and macro design were used in this study. Two groups, Group V (V-thread shape) and Group R (reverse buttress thread shape), were formed based on implant thread shape. Vertical and oblique loads were applied to the implants in order to evaluate tension, compression, and Von Mises stresses by implementing the three-dimensional finite element analysis. \nResults According to the stresses after the applied forces, the macrodesign of dental implants affects stress distribution in different directions. Group R exerted more stresses on the cortical bone, while Group V produced more stresses on the implants. Tissue level implants caused high stresses on bones and low stress on itself. As proposed, microthread neck design decreased the stresses on the cortical bone. \nConclusion In the light of these biomechanical findings, considering the anterior region of the mandible often consists of dense cortical bone, it may be advantageous to prefer implants with a V-thread design and a microthread neck surface, which creates less stress in the cortical bone.","PeriodicalId":42724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osseointegration","volume":"65 1","pages":"234-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osseointegration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23805/JO.2021.13.04.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the effect of different dental implant macrodesigns on the stress occurred on the implants and bone for two-implant-supported overdentures (IOD) in the rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles. Methods Six different implant brands and macro design were used in this study. Two groups, Group V (V-thread shape) and Group R (reverse buttress thread shape), were formed based on implant thread shape. Vertical and oblique loads were applied to the implants in order to evaluate tension, compression, and Von Mises stresses by implementing the three-dimensional finite element analysis. Results According to the stresses after the applied forces, the macrodesign of dental implants affects stress distribution in different directions. Group R exerted more stresses on the cortical bone, while Group V produced more stresses on the implants. Tissue level implants caused high stresses on bones and low stress on itself. As proposed, microthread neck design decreased the stresses on the cortical bone. Conclusion In the light of these biomechanical findings, considering the anterior region of the mandible often consists of dense cortical bone, it may be advantageous to prefer implants with a V-thread design and a microthread neck surface, which creates less stress in the cortical bone.
下颌种植覆盖义齿种植体宏观设计的生物力学行为
目的探讨不同种植体尺寸设计对双种植体覆盖义齿(IOD)修复无牙下颌骨时种植体和骨应力的影响。方法采用6种不同种植体品牌和宏观设计。根据种植体螺纹形状分为V组(V型螺纹)和R组(反支撑螺纹)。对种植体施加垂直和斜向载荷,通过三维有限元分析来评估拉伸、压缩和Von Mises应力。结果根据受力后的应力,种植体的宏观设计会影响不同方向的应力分布。R组对皮质骨的应力更大,而V组对种植体的应力更大。组织级植入物对骨骼造成高压力,对自身造成低压力。根据建议,微螺纹颈设计减少了皮质骨的应力。结论考虑到下颌骨前区通常由致密的皮质骨组成,选择v -螺纹设计和微螺纹颈面种植体可能是有利的,因为它对皮质骨产生的应力较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Osseointegration
Journal of Osseointegration DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信