Considerations on the study of drugs and vaccines in women during the covid-19 pandemic. The ema perspective

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Cavaleri
{"title":"Considerations on the study of drugs and vaccines in women during the covid-19 pandemic. The ema perspective","authors":"M. Cavaleri","doi":"10.1723/3673.36601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"from IGM webinar May 6, 2021 During the pandemic, several clinical trials for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 have been conducted with new or repurposed therapeutics and with investigational vaccines. Some of these studies were large randomized controlled trials that led to the approval of new vaccines or to recommending the use of therapeutics for COVID-19. In the context of such studies, women were generally included in a satisfactory proportion versus men. In the trials of therapeutics such as the studies conducted with remdesivir, baracitinib and dexamethasone, at least one third of the patients enrolled were women, reflecting the current proportion of COVID-19 female cases requiring hospitalization and oxygen supplementation. Interestingly, studies with immunomodulators showed some trends towards a reduced effect of the treatment in female patients compared with males, who suffer from a worse prognosis. However, other co-variates may have played a major role in explaining such difference, and more data need therefore to be collected. With respect to vaccines, it is well known that sex is a predictor of susceptibility to specific infections and autoimmune diseases, but it can also influence the response to immunization, which is why it is appropriate to have an adequate representation of females in the clinical trials with vaccines. Pivotal clinical trials conducted to support the approval of COVID-19 vaccines resulted in an equal enrollment across gender. The overall safety and efficacy profile did not differ between males and females for all the vaccines approved. From a safety perspective, the emergent cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia with the two approved viral vectored vaccines were reportedly more prevalent in females than males. More data are needed to further characterize the incidence of this risk by age and gender. Overall, during the pandemic large clinical trials to support the approval of vaccines and therapeutics included women to an adequate extent. Such effort allowed for the regulatory assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines and therapeutics also in females, thus further supporting their approval.","PeriodicalId":36473,"journal":{"name":"Italian Journal of Gender-Specific Medicine","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Journal of Gender-Specific Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1723/3673.36601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

from IGM webinar May 6, 2021 During the pandemic, several clinical trials for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 have been conducted with new or repurposed therapeutics and with investigational vaccines. Some of these studies were large randomized controlled trials that led to the approval of new vaccines or to recommending the use of therapeutics for COVID-19. In the context of such studies, women were generally included in a satisfactory proportion versus men. In the trials of therapeutics such as the studies conducted with remdesivir, baracitinib and dexamethasone, at least one third of the patients enrolled were women, reflecting the current proportion of COVID-19 female cases requiring hospitalization and oxygen supplementation. Interestingly, studies with immunomodulators showed some trends towards a reduced effect of the treatment in female patients compared with males, who suffer from a worse prognosis. However, other co-variates may have played a major role in explaining such difference, and more data need therefore to be collected. With respect to vaccines, it is well known that sex is a predictor of susceptibility to specific infections and autoimmune diseases, but it can also influence the response to immunization, which is why it is appropriate to have an adequate representation of females in the clinical trials with vaccines. Pivotal clinical trials conducted to support the approval of COVID-19 vaccines resulted in an equal enrollment across gender. The overall safety and efficacy profile did not differ between males and females for all the vaccines approved. From a safety perspective, the emergent cases of thrombosis with thrombocytopenia with the two approved viral vectored vaccines were reportedly more prevalent in females than males. More data are needed to further characterize the incidence of this risk by age and gender. Overall, during the pandemic large clinical trials to support the approval of vaccines and therapeutics included women to an adequate extent. Such effort allowed for the regulatory assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines and therapeutics also in females, thus further supporting their approval.
covid-19大流行期间妇女药物和疫苗研究的思考ema视角
在大流行期间,已经使用新的或重新利用的治疗方法以及研究性疫苗进行了几项治疗或预防COVID-19的临床试验。其中一些研究是大型随机对照试验,导致批准了新疫苗或推荐了COVID-19治疗方法的使用。在这类研究的背景下,与男性相比,女性通常被纳入令人满意的比例。在使用瑞德西韦、巴拉西替尼和地塞米松进行的治疗试验中,至少三分之一的入组患者是女性,这反映了目前需要住院和补充氧气的COVID-19女性病例的比例。有趣的是,免疫调节剂的研究显示,与预后较差的男性患者相比,女性患者的治疗效果有所降低。然而,其他协变量可能在解释这种差异方面发挥了主要作用,因此需要收集更多的数据。关于疫苗,众所周知,性别是对特定感染和自身免疫性疾病的易感性的一个预测指标,但它也可以影响对免疫的反应,这就是为什么在疫苗临床试验中有足够的女性代表是适当的。为支持COVID-19疫苗的批准而进行的关键临床试验导致性别平等。所有已批准的疫苗的总体安全性和有效性在男性和女性之间没有差异。从安全的角度来看,据报道,使用两种已批准的病毒载体疫苗的急诊血栓形成伴血小板减少症病例在女性中比男性更普遍。需要更多的数据来进一步按年龄和性别描述这种风险的发生率。总体而言,在大流行期间,为支持批准疫苗和治疗方法而进行的大型临床试验充分纳入了妇女。这一努力使得对疫苗和治疗方法的安全性和有效性进行监管性评估成为可能,也适用于女性,从而进一步支持其批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Italian Journal of Gender-Specific Medicine
Italian Journal of Gender-Specific Medicine Social Sciences-Gender Studies
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信