Rewilding – the Radical New Science of Ecological Recovery

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
M. Stalmans
{"title":"Rewilding – the Radical New Science of Ecological Recovery","authors":"M. Stalmans","doi":"10.2989/10220119.2022.2066177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science is co-published by NISC (Pty) Ltd and Informa UK Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group) This publication is promoted by the publisher as part of a series exploring the cutting edge of science and technology – ‘these are books for popular science readers who like to go a little deeper’. Indeed, it is a very accessible, easy read that strikes an upbeat tone despite the parlous state of affairs that rewilding is attempting to address. Already coined in the mid-1990’s, the concept of ‘rewilding’ shot to prominence in 2005–2006. It popularly conjures up an image of charismatic megaherbivores or large carnivores being brought back in an area from which they have been lost. Or, in the words of the authors, ‘the creation of large wilderness complexes and supporting populations of top predators (notably wolves in Yellowstone National Park) and the creation of a Serengeti-like landscape through the re-assembly of a guild of large herbivores in The Netherlands’. These large animals are, however, more often a means to an end. The emphasis of ‘rewilding’ is on restoring lost interactions at the landscape scale (page 5). In the second chapter of the book, the authors go back to the Pleistocene era to understand the potential of rewilding and to make the argument for multiple biodiversity baselines. They describe a past that up until 30 000 to 10 000 years ago was characterised by an abundance of megafauna that co-evolved alongside grasses and shrubs. As megafauna disappeared from much of the Earth towards the end of the Holocene ca. 10 000 years ago, many terrestrial ecosystems transitioned from grassland to more woody habitats. Whereas livestock herding maintained simplified, yet biodiverse ecosystems, these went into decline as a result of intensive livestock farming, land abandonment and rural depopulation. The latter obviously applying more to the north with African savannas and their megafauna in the south remaining more intact. This means that overall, the world’s terrestrial ecosystems have moved to both extremes of the wood-pasture gradient: less productive and abandoned land has become more wooded whereas land with more productive soils has become intensively managed pasture or agricultural fields (page 12). Rewilding is in part about recovering these more open habitats and the ecological richness they produce. Key to the rewilding is getting those animals that disappeared back into the system. In Chapter 4, the practical origins of rewilding are described including the examples of the Oostvaardersplassen in The Netherlands where the emphasis was on the introduction of primitive breeds of horse and cattle, and that of Yellowstone in the United States where the emphasis was on the re-establishment of wolves. At its core, rewilding is ecological restoration. The differences between rewilding and the discipline of restoration ecology in terms of ethos and focus are discussed in Chapter 5. Rather than attempting to turn the clock back to an arbitrary past baseline, rewilding focuses on restoring networks of interactions between communities and organisms and their physical environment. The ‘landscape of fear’ is described in this chapter. Whereas this always goes back to the textbook example of Yellowstone, more recently the concept has been described in Gorongosa National Park in Mozambique that is undergoing restoration after suffering huge declines in its herbivore and carnivore populations during the protracted civil war. Following the extirpation of leopards and African wild dogs from the Park, the forestdwelling bushbuck (Tragelaphus sylvaticus) expanded into treeless floodplains, where they consumed novel diets and suppressed a common food plant (waterwort, Bergia mossambicensis). By experimentally simulating predation risk, it was demonstrated that this behaviour was reversible. Thus, whereas anthropogenic predator extinction disrupted a trophic cascade by enabling rapid differentiation of prey behaviour, carnivore restoration may just as rapidly re-establish that cascade (Atkins et al. 2019). Similarly, the recovering herbivore population on the floodplain of Gorongosa started exerting top–down control of Mimosa pigra, an invasive alien plant species. Mimosa occurrence increased between 1972 and 2015, a period encompassing the near extirpation of large herbivores. From 2015 to 2019, Mimosa abundance declined as ungulate biomass recovered. DNA metabarcoding revealed that ruminant herbivores fed heavily on Mimosa, and experimental exclosures confirmed the causal role of mammalian herbivory in containing shrub encroachment. These results provide mechanistic evidence that trophic rewilding has rapidly revived biotic resistance to a notorious woody invader (Guyton et al. 2020). Rewilding ethics and politics take centre stage in Chapter 7. Indeed the subject of rewilding has led to fierce debates in conservation circles. Nowhere is this more evident than Book Review","PeriodicalId":50841,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"353 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Range & Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/10220119.2022.2066177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

African Journal of Range & Forage Science is co-published by NISC (Pty) Ltd and Informa UK Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group) This publication is promoted by the publisher as part of a series exploring the cutting edge of science and technology – ‘these are books for popular science readers who like to go a little deeper’. Indeed, it is a very accessible, easy read that strikes an upbeat tone despite the parlous state of affairs that rewilding is attempting to address. Already coined in the mid-1990’s, the concept of ‘rewilding’ shot to prominence in 2005–2006. It popularly conjures up an image of charismatic megaherbivores or large carnivores being brought back in an area from which they have been lost. Or, in the words of the authors, ‘the creation of large wilderness complexes and supporting populations of top predators (notably wolves in Yellowstone National Park) and the creation of a Serengeti-like landscape through the re-assembly of a guild of large herbivores in The Netherlands’. These large animals are, however, more often a means to an end. The emphasis of ‘rewilding’ is on restoring lost interactions at the landscape scale (page 5). In the second chapter of the book, the authors go back to the Pleistocene era to understand the potential of rewilding and to make the argument for multiple biodiversity baselines. They describe a past that up until 30 000 to 10 000 years ago was characterised by an abundance of megafauna that co-evolved alongside grasses and shrubs. As megafauna disappeared from much of the Earth towards the end of the Holocene ca. 10 000 years ago, many terrestrial ecosystems transitioned from grassland to more woody habitats. Whereas livestock herding maintained simplified, yet biodiverse ecosystems, these went into decline as a result of intensive livestock farming, land abandonment and rural depopulation. The latter obviously applying more to the north with African savannas and their megafauna in the south remaining more intact. This means that overall, the world’s terrestrial ecosystems have moved to both extremes of the wood-pasture gradient: less productive and abandoned land has become more wooded whereas land with more productive soils has become intensively managed pasture or agricultural fields (page 12). Rewilding is in part about recovering these more open habitats and the ecological richness they produce. Key to the rewilding is getting those animals that disappeared back into the system. In Chapter 4, the practical origins of rewilding are described including the examples of the Oostvaardersplassen in The Netherlands where the emphasis was on the introduction of primitive breeds of horse and cattle, and that of Yellowstone in the United States where the emphasis was on the re-establishment of wolves. At its core, rewilding is ecological restoration. The differences between rewilding and the discipline of restoration ecology in terms of ethos and focus are discussed in Chapter 5. Rather than attempting to turn the clock back to an arbitrary past baseline, rewilding focuses on restoring networks of interactions between communities and organisms and their physical environment. The ‘landscape of fear’ is described in this chapter. Whereas this always goes back to the textbook example of Yellowstone, more recently the concept has been described in Gorongosa National Park in Mozambique that is undergoing restoration after suffering huge declines in its herbivore and carnivore populations during the protracted civil war. Following the extirpation of leopards and African wild dogs from the Park, the forestdwelling bushbuck (Tragelaphus sylvaticus) expanded into treeless floodplains, where they consumed novel diets and suppressed a common food plant (waterwort, Bergia mossambicensis). By experimentally simulating predation risk, it was demonstrated that this behaviour was reversible. Thus, whereas anthropogenic predator extinction disrupted a trophic cascade by enabling rapid differentiation of prey behaviour, carnivore restoration may just as rapidly re-establish that cascade (Atkins et al. 2019). Similarly, the recovering herbivore population on the floodplain of Gorongosa started exerting top–down control of Mimosa pigra, an invasive alien plant species. Mimosa occurrence increased between 1972 and 2015, a period encompassing the near extirpation of large herbivores. From 2015 to 2019, Mimosa abundance declined as ungulate biomass recovered. DNA metabarcoding revealed that ruminant herbivores fed heavily on Mimosa, and experimental exclosures confirmed the causal role of mammalian herbivory in containing shrub encroachment. These results provide mechanistic evidence that trophic rewilding has rapidly revived biotic resistance to a notorious woody invader (Guyton et al. 2020). Rewilding ethics and politics take centre stage in Chapter 7. Indeed the subject of rewilding has led to fierce debates in conservation circles. Nowhere is this more evident than Book Review
野化——生态恢复的激进新科学
《非洲牧场与饲料科学杂志》由NISC (Pty)有限公司和Informa英国有限公司(以Taylor & Francis集团的名称进行交易)联合出版。该出版物由出版商作为探索科学和技术前沿系列的一部分进行推广——“这些书是为喜欢深入研究的科普读者准备的”。的确,这是一本非常通俗易懂的书,尽管野生化正试图解决危险的事态,但它却带有一种乐观的基调。“野化”这个概念早在上世纪90年代中期就已经出现,在2005年至2006年期间开始崭露头角。它通常会让人联想到一幅有魅力的巨型食草动物或大型食肉动物被带回它们失去的地方的画面。或者,用作者的话来说,“创造了大型荒野综合体和支持顶级食肉动物的种群(特别是黄石国家公园的狼),并通过荷兰大型食草动物公会的重新组装创造了塞伦盖蒂般的景观。”然而,这些大型动物更多的是达到目的的手段。“重新野生化”的重点是在景观尺度上恢复失去的相互作用(第5页)。在书的第二章中,作者回到更新世时代,以了解重新野生化的潜力,并提出了多种生物多样性基线的论点。他们描述了一个直到3万到1万年前的过去,其特征是大量的巨型动物与草和灌木共同进化。随着巨型动物在大约1万年前全新世末期从地球的大部分地区消失,许多陆地生态系统从草原过渡到更多的木本栖息地。虽然畜牧业维持了简化但生物多样性的生态系统,但由于集约化畜牧业、土地遗弃和农村人口减少,这些生态系统正在衰退。后者显然更多地应用于北方,非洲稀树草原和南方的巨型动物则更完整。这意味着,总体而言,世界陆地生态系统已经走向了木牧场梯度的两个极端:生产力较低和被遗弃的土地变得树木繁茂,而土壤生产力较高的土地变成了集约化管理的牧场或农田(第12页)。野化在一定程度上是为了恢复这些更开放的栖息地和它们产生的生态丰富性。野化的关键是让那些消失的动物回归生态系统。在第四章中,描述了野生化的实际起源,包括荷兰的Oostvaardersplassen的例子,重点是引入原始品种的马和牛,以及美国黄石公园的例子,重点是重新建立狼。野化的核心是生态恢复。第五章讨论了野化与恢复生态学在精神和重点方面的差异。野生化的重点是恢复群落和生物及其物理环境之间的相互作用网络,而不是试图将时钟拨回到任意的过去基线。这一章描述了“恐惧的景观”。虽然这总是回到黄石公园的教科书例子,但最近在莫桑比克的戈龙戈萨国家公园(Gorongosa National Park)描述了这一概念,该公园在旷日持久的内战期间遭受了食草动物和食肉动物数量的大幅下降,目前正在进行修复。随着公园里的豹子和非洲野狗的灭绝,生活在森林里的灌木(Tragelaphus sylvaticus)扩展到没有树木的洪泛平原,在那里它们吃新的食物,抑制了一种常见的食物植物(水草,Bergia mossambicensis)。通过实验模拟捕食风险,证明了这种行为是可逆的。因此,尽管人为的捕食者灭绝通过使猎物行为快速分化而破坏了营养级联,但食肉动物的恢复可能同样迅速地重建这一级联(Atkins et al. 2019)。同样,戈龙戈萨河漫滩上正在恢复的食草动物种群开始自上而下地控制一种入侵的外来植物——含水草。1972年至2015年间,含羞草的数量有所增加,这一时期大型食草动物几乎灭绝。从2015年到2019年,含羞草丰度随着有蹄类生物量的恢复而下降。DNA元条形码显示,反刍食草动物以含水草为食,实验证实了哺乳动物的食草性在抑制灌木入侵中的因果作用。这些结果提供了机制证据,表明营养性野化已经迅速恢复了生物对臭名昭著的木质入侵者的抵抗力(Guyton et al. 2020)。在第七章中,伦理和政治的重新回归占据了中心位置。事实上,野生化这个话题在环保界引发了激烈的争论。这一点没有比《书评》更明显的了
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Journal of Range & Forage Science
African Journal of Range & Forage Science ECOLOGY-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The African Journal of Range & Forage Science is the leading rangeland and pastoral journal in Africa. The Journal is dedicated to publishing quality original material that advances rangeland ecology and pasture management. The journal aims to publish research of international importance from any region, but as an African journal, we are particularly interested in research from Africa and relevant to the continent. The Journal promotes both science and its application and authors are encouraged to explicitly identify the practical implications of their work. Peer-reviewed research papers and research notes deal primarily with all aspects of rangeland and pasture ecology and management, including the ecophysiology and biogeochemistry of rangelands and pastures, terrestrial plant–herbivore interactions (both domestic and wild), rangeland assessment and monitoring, effects of climate change on rangelands, rangeland and pasture management, rangeland rehabilitation, ecosystem services in support of production, conservation and biodiversity goals, and the identification and development of intensive and semi-intensive pasture and forage resources to meet livestock production needs. Articles highlighting transdisciplinary linkages among biophysical and social sciences that support management, policy and societal values are particularly encouraged. The Journal includes relevant book reviews and invited perspectives that contribute to the development of range and forage science. Letters to the editor that debate issues raised in the Journal are acceptable. The African Journal of Range & Forage Science is the official journal of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信