A comparison of slow release potassium fertilisers for pasture

W. Saunders, D. M. Cooper, R. Campkin
{"title":"A comparison of slow release potassium fertilisers for pasture","authors":"W. Saunders, D. M. Cooper, R. Campkin","doi":"10.1080/03015521.1988.10425611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Luxury uptake of potassium (K) from potassium chloride (KC1) by pasture plants is a major disadvantage in its use as a fertiliser for pastures. Luxury uptake shortens the fertiliser's effective life and causes excessively high concentrations of potassium relative to calcium, magnesium, and sodium. This can result in health problems for grazing stock. A further disadvantage is that KC1 is readily leached from the soil if there is heavy rain. Coating KC1 has been tried as a way of slowing the release of K and its uptake by ryegrass, and of reducing loss by leaching. Coating KC1 with sulphur reduced its rate of dissolution greatly and avoided luxury uptake by the grass. On an extremely K deficient soil there was some loss of growth relative to uncoated KC1 for 2 months, but over the next 4 months, the sulphur-coated KC1 gave higher yields. Wax-coated KC1 gave practically the same results as uncoated KC1. A leaching test was used to measure rate of solution of KC1 and its results related well to the ...","PeriodicalId":19285,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture","volume":"8 1","pages":"29-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand journal of experimental agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03015521.1988.10425611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Luxury uptake of potassium (K) from potassium chloride (KC1) by pasture plants is a major disadvantage in its use as a fertiliser for pastures. Luxury uptake shortens the fertiliser's effective life and causes excessively high concentrations of potassium relative to calcium, magnesium, and sodium. This can result in health problems for grazing stock. A further disadvantage is that KC1 is readily leached from the soil if there is heavy rain. Coating KC1 has been tried as a way of slowing the release of K and its uptake by ryegrass, and of reducing loss by leaching. Coating KC1 with sulphur reduced its rate of dissolution greatly and avoided luxury uptake by the grass. On an extremely K deficient soil there was some loss of growth relative to uncoated KC1 for 2 months, but over the next 4 months, the sulphur-coated KC1 gave higher yields. Wax-coated KC1 gave practically the same results as uncoated KC1. A leaching test was used to measure rate of solution of KC1 and its results related well to the ...
牧草用缓释钾肥的比较
牧草对氯化钾(KC1)的过量吸收是其作为牧草肥料的一个主要缺点。过量吸收会缩短肥料的有效寿命,并导致钾相对于钙、镁和钠的浓度过高。这可能会导致放牧牲畜的健康问题。另一个缺点是,如果下大雨,KC1很容易从土壤中浸出。涂布KC1作为减缓黑麦草对钾的释放和吸收以及减少浸出损失的一种方法已被尝试过。用硫包覆KC1大大降低了其溶解速度,避免了草对奢侈的吸收。在极度缺钾土壤上,相对于未包膜的KC1,在2个月内有一些生长损失,但在接下来的4个月里,硫包膜的KC1产量更高。涂蜡的KC1与未涂蜡的KC1的结果几乎相同。用浸出法测定了KC1的溶出率,其结果与试验结果吻合较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信