Negotiations on GHG emissions from international marine and aviation bunkers: Issues and concerns

A. Garg
{"title":"Negotiations on GHG emissions from international marine and aviation bunkers: Issues and concerns","authors":"A. Garg","doi":"10.3233/RED-120061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Kyoto Protocol (KP) is a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC or FCCC), and primary tool aimed at combating global warming and climate change. The KP does not cover emissions from international bunkers and in its paragraph 2.2 directs Annex I countries to pursue reduction of GHG emissions from marine and aviation bunker fuels by ‘working through’ IMO (International Maritime Organization) and ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) respectively. Getting the mandate from UNFCCC, IMO and ICAO have been leading the discussions on formulating a regime to address the GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions from shipping and aviation respectively. However, there are differences on the issue of coverage of emissions from international bunkers (aviation and shipping) and especially the scope of the application of market based measures. Some of the nations want the global application of measures based on the ‘no more favourable treatment principle‘ (which was adopted in 1982 in the Paris memorandum of understanding on port state control and proposes ‘flag neutrality’) in the case of shipping and Chicago Convention in the case of aviation. On the other hand, other nations want the adoption of CBDR (common but differentiated responsibility) principles in any proceeding on the matter. The debate has entered into a deadlock. The paper discusses this issue of the coverage of GHG emissions from international marine and aviation bunkers and brings to light the various discussions that have happened on the same. An attempt has been made to identify the problem associated with the issue and finally some recommendations have been made.","PeriodicalId":17166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Resources, Energy, and Development","volume":"6 1","pages":"81-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Resources, Energy, and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/RED-120061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Kyoto Protocol (KP) is a protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC or FCCC), and primary tool aimed at combating global warming and climate change. The KP does not cover emissions from international bunkers and in its paragraph 2.2 directs Annex I countries to pursue reduction of GHG emissions from marine and aviation bunker fuels by ‘working through’ IMO (International Maritime Organization) and ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) respectively. Getting the mandate from UNFCCC, IMO and ICAO have been leading the discussions on formulating a regime to address the GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions from shipping and aviation respectively. However, there are differences on the issue of coverage of emissions from international bunkers (aviation and shipping) and especially the scope of the application of market based measures. Some of the nations want the global application of measures based on the ‘no more favourable treatment principle‘ (which was adopted in 1982 in the Paris memorandum of understanding on port state control and proposes ‘flag neutrality’) in the case of shipping and Chicago Convention in the case of aviation. On the other hand, other nations want the adoption of CBDR (common but differentiated responsibility) principles in any proceeding on the matter. The debate has entered into a deadlock. The paper discusses this issue of the coverage of GHG emissions from international marine and aviation bunkers and brings to light the various discussions that have happened on the same. An attempt has been made to identify the problem associated with the issue and finally some recommendations have been made.
关于国际海洋和航空掩体温室气体排放的谈判:问题和关注
《京都议定书》(KP)是《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC或FCCC)的一项议定书,也是应对全球变暖和气候变化的主要工具。《京都议定书》不包括国际燃料油的排放,并在其第2.2段中指示附件一国家分别通过IMO(国际海事组织)和ICAO(国际民用航空组织)努力减少海洋和航空燃料油的温室气体排放。根据《联合国气候变化框架公约》的授权,国际海事组织和国际民航组织一直在牵头讨论制定解决航运和航空温室气体排放问题的机制。但是,在国际燃料(航空和航运)排放的范围问题上,特别是在以市场为基础的措施的适用范围问题上存在分歧。一些国家希望在全球范围内采用基于“不给予更优惠待遇原则”的措施(该原则于1982年在关于港口国控制的巴黎谅解备忘录中被采纳,并提出了“旗帜中立”),适用于航运,适用于航空的芝加哥公约。另一方面,其他国家希望在有关该问题的任何程序中采用CBDR(共同但有区别的责任)原则。辩论陷入了僵局。本文讨论了国际海洋和航空掩体温室气体排放的覆盖问题,并揭示了在同一问题上发生的各种讨论。试图找出与这个问题有关的问题,最后提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信