Comparison of Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Four Different Types of Glass Ionomer Luting Cements in Artificial Saliva

A. Shishehian, F. Amiri, A. Izadi, S. Abbasi, M. Farhadian, Armaqan Shahbazi
{"title":"Comparison of Sorption and Solubility Behavior of Four Different Types of Glass Ionomer Luting Cements in Artificial Saliva","authors":"A. Shishehian, F. Amiri, A. Izadi, S. Abbasi, M. Farhadian, Armaqan Shahbazi","doi":"10.34172/ajdr.2021.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Luting cement provides the connection between crowns and tooth structure. The sensitivity, solubility, and decomposition stages of the cement after the hardening stage are still subjects of relative controversy. These characteristics could lead to a poor connection between the braces and the teeth, increased probability of decay, and decalcification. The present study aimed to evaluate the adsorption and solubility of 4 types of glass ionomer cement. Methods: Four luting cements were examined. A total of 10 specimens were prepared for each material following the manufacturer’s instructions, and the sorption and solubility were measured in accordance with the ISO 4049’s. Specimens were immersed in artificial saliva for 30 days, and were evaluated for sorption and solubility by first weighting them before incubation (W1), then immersing them in artificial saliva, dehydrating them in an oven for 24 hours, and weighing them again (W2 and W3, respectively). The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 21. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post hoc test was used to examine the differences among groups (α = 0.05). Results: As for the both sorption and solubility, there was a significant interaction between the sorption and solubility of all materials (P<0.001). The sorption values in artificial saliva were highest for glass ionomer cement Riva Luting followed by GC Fuji 1 and Cavex, whereas the least value was observed for Meron (P<0.000). As for solubility, it was significantly higher in Cavex followed by GC Fuji1 and Meron, but it was significantly lower in Riva Luting. Conclusions: It was determined that the weight changes of glass ionomer cements significantly varied among all the materials. Riva Luting followed by GC Fuji 1 had the highest water sorption, and the solubility was significantly higher in Cavex followed by GC Fuji1. Meron improved both water sorption and solubility properties among all glass ionomer cements.","PeriodicalId":8679,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Dental Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ajdr.2021.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Luting cement provides the connection between crowns and tooth structure. The sensitivity, solubility, and decomposition stages of the cement after the hardening stage are still subjects of relative controversy. These characteristics could lead to a poor connection between the braces and the teeth, increased probability of decay, and decalcification. The present study aimed to evaluate the adsorption and solubility of 4 types of glass ionomer cement. Methods: Four luting cements were examined. A total of 10 specimens were prepared for each material following the manufacturer’s instructions, and the sorption and solubility were measured in accordance with the ISO 4049’s. Specimens were immersed in artificial saliva for 30 days, and were evaluated for sorption and solubility by first weighting them before incubation (W1), then immersing them in artificial saliva, dehydrating them in an oven for 24 hours, and weighing them again (W2 and W3, respectively). The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 21. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey post hoc test was used to examine the differences among groups (α = 0.05). Results: As for the both sorption and solubility, there was a significant interaction between the sorption and solubility of all materials (P<0.001). The sorption values in artificial saliva were highest for glass ionomer cement Riva Luting followed by GC Fuji 1 and Cavex, whereas the least value was observed for Meron (P<0.000). As for solubility, it was significantly higher in Cavex followed by GC Fuji1 and Meron, but it was significantly lower in Riva Luting. Conclusions: It was determined that the weight changes of glass ionomer cements significantly varied among all the materials. Riva Luting followed by GC Fuji 1 had the highest water sorption, and the solubility was significantly higher in Cavex followed by GC Fuji1. Meron improved both water sorption and solubility properties among all glass ionomer cements.
四种不同类型的玻璃离子水门汀在人工唾液中的吸附和溶解度比较
背景:牙钉提供了冠与牙齿结构之间的连接。水泥硬化后的敏感性、溶解度、分解阶段等仍存在较大争议。这些特征会导致牙套和牙齿之间的连接不良,增加蛀牙和脱钙的可能性。研究了4种玻璃离子水门合剂的吸附和溶解度。方法:对4种骨水泥进行检查。根据制造商的说明,每种材料共制备了10个样品,并根据ISO 4049的吸附性和溶解度进行了测量。将标本浸泡在人工唾液中30天,孵育前称重(W1),然后浸泡在人工唾液中,在烘箱中脱水24小时,再次称重(W2和W3),评估样品的吸附和溶解度。采用SPSS软件21版对数据进行分析。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和Tukey事后检验检验各组间差异(α = 0.05)。结果:在吸附性和溶解度方面,各材料的吸附性和溶解度之间存在显著的交互作用(P<0.001)。人工唾液的吸附值以Riva Luting最高,GC Fuji 1和Cavex次之,Meron最低(P<0.000)。溶解度在Cavex中显著较高,GC Fuji1次之,Meron次之,Riva Luting显著较低。结论:玻璃离子水门栓的重量变化在不同的材料中有明显的差异。Riva Luting的吸水率最高,GC Fuji1次之,在Cavex中的溶解度显著高于GC Fuji1。Meron改善了所有玻璃离子胶结物的吸水性和溶解度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信