Associations between Profiles of Maternal Strengths and Positive Parenting Practices among Mothers Experiencing Adversity

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
K. Decker, I. Thurston, Kathryn H. Howell, Amanda J. Hasselle, Rebecca C. Kamody
{"title":"Associations between Profiles of Maternal Strengths and Positive Parenting Practices among Mothers Experiencing Adversity","authors":"K. Decker, I. Thurston, Kathryn H. Howell, Amanda J. Hasselle, Rebecca C. Kamody","doi":"10.1080/15295192.2020.1729611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SYNOPSIS Objective . Few studies have explored associations between strength-based factors and positive parenting among mothers experiencing adversity. Adopting a person-centered statistical approach, we examined how patterns of maternal strengths relate to positive parenting practices. Design . Participants were 188 female primary caregivers (71% African American) who experienced intimate partner violence and/or were living with HIV. Women were recruited from community organizations in the Mid-Southern United States and completed measures of adaptability, spirituality, ethnic identity, social support, parent-child communication, community cohesion, and parenting practices. Latent profile analysis was used to generate classes of individual (adaptability, spirituality, education), relational (family support, friend support, parent-child communication about Substance Abuse, Violence, and AIDS/HIV), and contextual (ethnic identity, community cohesion) factors, in line with the social-ecological model of resilience. Associations between the classes and positive parenting practices were examined. Results . Three classes emerged: (1) Low Individual, Relational, & Contextual (LIRC; n = 18); (2) Low SAVA Communication (LSC; n = 30); and (3) High Individual, Relational, & Contextual (HIRC; n = 140). Mothers in the LIRC class reported lower parental involvement and less positive parenting practices than those in the HIRC class. Conclusions . Mothers who endorse increased individual, relational, and contextual factors utilize more positive parenting practices. Optimal clinical approaches to enhance parenting should target supports at multiple levels.","PeriodicalId":47432,"journal":{"name":"Parenting-Science and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parenting-Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2020.1729611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

SYNOPSIS Objective . Few studies have explored associations between strength-based factors and positive parenting among mothers experiencing adversity. Adopting a person-centered statistical approach, we examined how patterns of maternal strengths relate to positive parenting practices. Design . Participants were 188 female primary caregivers (71% African American) who experienced intimate partner violence and/or were living with HIV. Women were recruited from community organizations in the Mid-Southern United States and completed measures of adaptability, spirituality, ethnic identity, social support, parent-child communication, community cohesion, and parenting practices. Latent profile analysis was used to generate classes of individual (adaptability, spirituality, education), relational (family support, friend support, parent-child communication about Substance Abuse, Violence, and AIDS/HIV), and contextual (ethnic identity, community cohesion) factors, in line with the social-ecological model of resilience. Associations between the classes and positive parenting practices were examined. Results . Three classes emerged: (1) Low Individual, Relational, & Contextual (LIRC; n = 18); (2) Low SAVA Communication (LSC; n = 30); and (3) High Individual, Relational, & Contextual (HIRC; n = 140). Mothers in the LIRC class reported lower parental involvement and less positive parenting practices than those in the HIRC class. Conclusions . Mothers who endorse increased individual, relational, and contextual factors utilize more positive parenting practices. Optimal clinical approaches to enhance parenting should target supports at multiple levels.
逆境中母亲的优势与积极育儿行为的关系
目的:很少有研究探讨在经历逆境的母亲中,基于力量的因素和积极育儿之间的联系。采用以人为本的统计方法,我们研究了母亲优势模式与积极育儿实践的关系。设计。参与者是188名女性主要照顾者(71%是非裔美国人),她们经历过亲密伴侣暴力和/或感染了艾滋病毒。研究人员从美国中南部的社区组织招募了一些女性,让她们完成了适应性、灵性、种族认同、社会支持、亲子沟通、社区凝聚力和育儿实践等方面的测试。根据心理弹性的社会生态模型,使用潜在剖面分析生成个体(适应性、灵性、教育)、关系(家庭支持、朋友支持、关于药物滥用、暴力和艾滋病/HIV的亲子沟通)和情境(种族认同、社区凝聚力)因素的类别。研究人员还调查了这些课程与积极的育儿实践之间的联系。结果。出现了三个类别:(1)低个体、关系和语境(LIRC);N = 18);(2)低SAVA通信;N = 30);(3)高个体、关系和语境(HIRC);N = 140)。与HIRC班的母亲相比,LIRC班的母亲报告的父母参与程度较低,积极的育儿实践较少。结论。赞成增加个人、关系和环境因素的母亲使用更积极的育儿实践。提高父母教养的最佳临床方法应针对多个层面的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Parenting: Science and Practice strives to promote the exchange of empirical findings, theoretical perspectives, and methodological approaches from all disciplines that help to define and advance theory, research, and practice in parenting, caregiving, and childrearing broadly construed. "Parenting" is interpreted to include biological parents and grandparents, adoptive parents, nonparental caregivers, and others, including infrahuman parents. Articles on parenting itself, antecedents of parenting, parenting effects on parents and on children, the multiple contexts of parenting, and parenting interventions and education are all welcome. The journal brings parenting to science and science to parenting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信