Comparing the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block catheters with surgically placed extrapleural catheters after thoracic surgery: a retrospective cohort study

A. Xin, R. Hu, L. Fletcher, C. Tan
{"title":"Comparing the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block catheters with surgically placed extrapleural catheters after thoracic surgery: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"A. Xin, R. Hu, L. Fletcher, C. Tan","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2022-103614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2022. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. INTRODUCTION Inadequate analgesia after thoracic surgery has been associated with postoperative pulmonary complications and prolonged hospital stay. Regional anesthesia provides effective opioidsparing analgesia and has been recommended during enhanced recovery after lung surgery. Surgically placed extrapleural (EP) catheters have been shown to be as effective as thoracic epidural catheters for postoperative pain relief; however, there is scant data evaluating the relative efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) catheters. In this study, we aim to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two techniques in treating acute pain after thoracic surgery using direct causal effect analysis.","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":"86 1","pages":"504 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-103614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

© American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2022. No commercial reuse. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. INTRODUCTION Inadequate analgesia after thoracic surgery has been associated with postoperative pulmonary complications and prolonged hospital stay. Regional anesthesia provides effective opioidsparing analgesia and has been recommended during enhanced recovery after lung surgery. Surgically placed extrapleural (EP) catheters have been shown to be as effective as thoracic epidural catheters for postoperative pain relief; however, there is scant data evaluating the relative efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) catheters. In this study, we aim to compare the analgesic efficacy of the two techniques in treating acute pain after thoracic surgery using direct causal effect analysis.
回顾性队列研究:胸手术后竖脊平面阻滞导管与胸膜外置管镇痛效果的比较
©美国区域麻醉与疼痛医学学会2022。禁止商业重用。请参阅权利和权限。英国医学杂志出版。胸外科手术后不适当的镇痛与术后肺部并发症和住院时间延长有关。区域麻醉提供有效的阿片类药物节约镇痛,并被推荐用于肺手术后的增强恢复。手术放置胸膜外导管(EP)已被证明是有效的胸硬膜外导管术后疼痛缓解;然而,很少有数据评估直立脊柱平面阻滞(ESPB)导管的相对疗效。在这项研究中,我们的目的是通过直接因果分析来比较两种技术治疗胸外科术后急性疼痛的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信