Effect of Continuous Paravertebral Dexmedetomidine Administration on Intraoperative Anesthetic Drug Requirement and Post-Thoracotomy Pain Syndrome After Thoracotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Vikas Dutta, B. Kumar, A. Jayant, A. Mishra
{"title":"Effect of Continuous Paravertebral Dexmedetomidine Administration on Intraoperative Anesthetic Drug Requirement and Post-Thoracotomy Pain Syndrome After Thoracotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Vikas Dutta, B. Kumar, A. Jayant, A. Mishra","doi":"10.1097/01.sa.0000521732.87385.7f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo assess the effect of paravertebral administration of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetic on the intraoperative anesthetic drug requirement and incidence of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome.\n\n\nDESIGN\nProspective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.\n\n\nSETTING\nSingle university hospital.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS\nThe study comprised 30 patients who underwent elective thoracotomy and were assigned randomly to either the Ropin or Dexem group (n = 15 each).\n\n\nINTERVENTIONS\nAll patients received the study medications through paravertebral catheter. Patients in the Ropin group received a bolus of 15 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine over 3-to-5 minutes followed by an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 0.1 mL/kg/hour. Patients in the Dexem group received 15 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine, 1 µg/kg bolus over 3-to-5 minutes followed by an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine plus 0.2 µg/kg/hour of dexmedetomidine at 0.1 mL/kg/hour.\n\n\nMEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS\nThe primary outcome of the study was intraoperative anesthetic drug requirement. The secondary outcome was the incidence of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome 2 months after surgery. The amount of propofol required for induction of anesthesia was significantly less in the Dexem group (Dexem 49.33±20.51 v 74.33±18.40 in the Ropin group, p = 0.002). End-tidal isoflurane needed to maintain target entropy was significantly less in the Dexem group at all time points. Intraoperative fentanyl requirement was lower in the Dexem group (Dexem 115.33±33.77 v 178.67±32.48 in the Ropin group, p = 0.002). Postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption were significantly less in the Dexem group (p<0.001). The incidence of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome was comparable between the 2 groups (69.23% v 50%, p = 0.496).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nParavertebral dexmedetomidine administration resulted in decreased intraoperative anesthetic drug requirement, less pain, and lower requirements of supplemental opioid in the postoperative period. However, it had no effect on the incidence of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome.","PeriodicalId":22104,"journal":{"name":"Survey of Anesthesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Survey of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sa.0000521732.87385.7f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To assess the effect of paravertebral administration of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to local anesthetic on the intraoperative anesthetic drug requirement and incidence of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. SETTING Single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS The study comprised 30 patients who underwent elective thoracotomy and were assigned randomly to either the Ropin or Dexem group (n = 15 each). INTERVENTIONS All patients received the study medications through paravertebral catheter. Patients in the Ropin group received a bolus of 15 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine over 3-to-5 minutes followed by an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 0.1 mL/kg/hour. Patients in the Dexem group received 15 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine, 1 µg/kg bolus over 3-to-5 minutes followed by an infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine plus 0.2 µg/kg/hour of dexmedetomidine at 0.1 mL/kg/hour. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The primary outcome of the study was intraoperative anesthetic drug requirement. The secondary outcome was the incidence of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome 2 months after surgery. The amount of propofol required for induction of anesthesia was significantly less in the Dexem group (Dexem 49.33±20.51 v 74.33±18.40 in the Ropin group, p = 0.002). End-tidal isoflurane needed to maintain target entropy was significantly less in the Dexem group at all time points. Intraoperative fentanyl requirement was lower in the Dexem group (Dexem 115.33±33.77 v 178.67±32.48 in the Ropin group, p = 0.002). Postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption were significantly less in the Dexem group (p<0.001). The incidence of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome was comparable between the 2 groups (69.23% v 50%, p = 0.496). CONCLUSIONS Paravertebral dexmedetomidine administration resulted in decreased intraoperative anesthetic drug requirement, less pain, and lower requirements of supplemental opioid in the postoperative period. However, it had no effect on the incidence of post-thoracotomy pain syndrome.
椎旁连续给予右美托咪定对术中麻醉药物需求和开胸后疼痛综合征的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的评价椎旁给药右美托咪定辅助局麻药对术中麻醉药物需求量和开胸术后疼痛综合征发生率的影响。前瞻性、随机、对照、双盲试验。单一大学医院。参与者:该研究包括30例接受择期开胸手术的患者,随机分为Ropin组和Dexem组(各15例)。干预措施所有患者均通过椎旁导管接受研究药物治疗。罗平组患者在3- 5分钟内注射15ml 0.75%罗哌卡因,然后以0.1 mL/kg/小时的速度输注0.2%罗哌卡因。右塞姆组患者接受15 mL 0.75%罗哌卡因加右美托咪定,1µg/kg, 3- 5分钟,随后以0.1 mL/kg/小时滴注0.2%罗哌卡因加0.2µg/kg/小时右美托咪定。研究的主要结果是术中麻醉药物的需要量。次要结果是术后2个月开胸后疼痛综合征的发生率。Dexem组诱导麻醉所需异丙酚用量明显低于Ropin组(Dexem 49.33±20.51 vs 74.33±18.40,p = 0.002)。在所有时间点,Dexem组维持目标熵所需的末潮异氟醚明显减少。Dexem组术中芬太尼需求量较低(Dexem为115.33±33.77 vs Ropin为178.67±32.48,p = 0.002)。Dexem组术后疼痛评分和吗啡用量显著低于对照组(p<0.001)。两组患者开胸后疼痛综合征发生率比较,差异有统计学意义(69.23% vs 50%, p = 0.496)。结论椎旁右美托咪定可减少术中麻醉药物的需用量,减轻疼痛,降低术后阿片类药物的需用量。然而,它对开胸术后疼痛综合征的发生率没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信