9 Economic evaluation in obstetrics and gynaecology

Mark Sculpher
{"title":"9 Economic evaluation in obstetrics and gynaecology","authors":"Mark Sculpher","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80011-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It is an economic fact of life in all health-care systems that decisions will have to be taken about which programmes and interventions should and should not be provided. The splitting of the roles of purchasing and providing within the UK's NHS has made these decisions more explicit and, together with devolved budgets, required more health service professionals to understand the analytical methods of economic evaluation. Certainly, increasing numbers of economic studies will be undertaken in obstetrics and gynaecology. Checklists exist to assist decision-makers in judging the quality of published studies (<span>Drummond et al, 1987</span>), but it should be emphasized that different studies seek to answer different questions. In particular, it is important to be aware of the level of efficiency being addressed in an analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77031,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 661-675"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80011-3","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950355296800113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It is an economic fact of life in all health-care systems that decisions will have to be taken about which programmes and interventions should and should not be provided. The splitting of the roles of purchasing and providing within the UK's NHS has made these decisions more explicit and, together with devolved budgets, required more health service professionals to understand the analytical methods of economic evaluation. Certainly, increasing numbers of economic studies will be undertaken in obstetrics and gynaecology. Checklists exist to assist decision-makers in judging the quality of published studies (Drummond et al, 1987), but it should be emphasized that different studies seek to answer different questions. In particular, it is important to be aware of the level of efficiency being addressed in an analysis.

妇产科的经济评价
在所有卫生保健系统中,必须就应该提供和不应该提供哪些规划和干预措施作出决定,这是一个生活中的经济事实。在英国国民保健服务体系中,采购和提供角色的分离使得这些决策更加明确,并且连同下放的预算,需要更多的卫生服务专业人员了解经济评估的分析方法。当然,将在产科和妇科进行越来越多的经济研究。检查表的存在是为了帮助决策者判断已发表研究的质量(Drummond et al, 1987),但应该强调的是,不同的研究寻求回答不同的问题。特别重要的是,要意识到在分析中要处理的效率水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信