Comparison of the differences in response to the change of the extrafloral nectar-ant-herbivore interaction system between a native and an introduced Passiflora species.

Xu Fangfang, C. Jin
{"title":"Comparison of the differences in response to the change of the extrafloral nectar-ant-herbivore interaction system between a native and an introduced Passiflora species.","authors":"Xu Fangfang, C. Jin","doi":"10.3724/SP.J.1143.2009.00543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How introduced plants associate with native biotic is one of the fundamental questions in evolutionary biology and invasive biology. Extrafloral nectar ( EFN) bearing plants usually use nectar to attract ants while those ants could help plants defense herbivores; establishing a plan-t an-t herbivore interactive system. In this study , we conducted artificial an-t exclusion, EFN-exclusion, herbivore exclusion, ant and herbivore exclusion to compare the differences in response to the change of the extrafloral nectaran-t herbivore interaction system in an native passionflower ( Passiflora siamica) and an newly introduced species ( P1 coccinea) . A total of about 24 ant species were recorded consuming the EFN resource. There was no significant difference in the total number of visiting ants while ant species composition was different in the two Passiflora plants (V = 141 76, df= 4, P< 0101) . The most abundant ant species for P1 siamica was Dolichoderus thoracicus while for P1 coccinea was Paratrechina sp. The herbivorous insects observed were mainly generalists, including snails, katydisds ( Pseudophyllidae) or some larvae of butterflies and moths. The amount of nectar per leaf produced from P1 siamica is significantly higher than P1 coccinea ( Willcox, z= 3187, P< 0101) . An-t exclusion in this experiment did not signif-i cantly influence the average leaf loss per plant. The treatments for an-t exclusion, herbivore exclusion, and ant+ herbivore exclusion all did not significantly influence the EFN production. As a whole, the plan-t an-t generalist herbivore in the 云 南 植 物 研 究 2009, 31 ( 6) : 543~ 550 Acta Botanica Yunnanica DOI: 1013724PSP1J1 114312009109101 X 通讯作者: Author for correspondence; E-mail: biotrans@ bn1yn1 cninfo1ne 收稿日期: 20090525, 20090811接受发表 作者简介: 徐芳芳 ( 1981) 女, 在读硕士研究生, 主要从事植物与蚂蚁互惠关系的研究。 two Passiflora species did not show a significant difference in the response to the change, while the interactive system with specialist herbivores request further investigation.","PeriodicalId":7106,"journal":{"name":"Acta Botanica Yunnanica","volume":"106 1","pages":"543-550"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Botanica Yunnanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1143.2009.00543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

How introduced plants associate with native biotic is one of the fundamental questions in evolutionary biology and invasive biology. Extrafloral nectar ( EFN) bearing plants usually use nectar to attract ants while those ants could help plants defense herbivores; establishing a plan-t an-t herbivore interactive system. In this study , we conducted artificial an-t exclusion, EFN-exclusion, herbivore exclusion, ant and herbivore exclusion to compare the differences in response to the change of the extrafloral nectaran-t herbivore interaction system in an native passionflower ( Passiflora siamica) and an newly introduced species ( P1 coccinea) . A total of about 24 ant species were recorded consuming the EFN resource. There was no significant difference in the total number of visiting ants while ant species composition was different in the two Passiflora plants (V = 141 76, df= 4, P< 0101) . The most abundant ant species for P1 siamica was Dolichoderus thoracicus while for P1 coccinea was Paratrechina sp. The herbivorous insects observed were mainly generalists, including snails, katydisds ( Pseudophyllidae) or some larvae of butterflies and moths. The amount of nectar per leaf produced from P1 siamica is significantly higher than P1 coccinea ( Willcox, z= 3187, P< 0101) . An-t exclusion in this experiment did not signif-i cantly influence the average leaf loss per plant. The treatments for an-t exclusion, herbivore exclusion, and ant+ herbivore exclusion all did not significantly influence the EFN production. As a whole, the plan-t an-t generalist herbivore in the 云 南 植 物 研 究 2009, 31 ( 6) : 543~ 550 Acta Botanica Yunnanica DOI: 1013724PSP1J1 114312009109101 X 通讯作者: Author for correspondence; E-mail: biotrans@ bn1yn1 cninfo1ne 收稿日期: 20090525, 20090811接受发表 作者简介: 徐芳芳 ( 1981) 女, 在读硕士研究生, 主要从事植物与蚂蚁互惠关系的研究。 two Passiflora species did not show a significant difference in the response to the change, while the interactive system with specialist herbivores request further investigation.
原生与引种西番莲花外花蜜-抗草食相互作用系统变化响应差异的比较。
外来植物如何与本地生物结合是进化生物学和入侵生物学的基本问题之一。花蜜植物通常利用花蜜吸引蚂蚁,而蚂蚁可以帮助植物防御食草动物;建立植食互动系统。本研究采用人工抗虫、efn排斥、食草动物排斥、蚂蚁和食草动物排斥等方法,比较了本土西番莲(Passiflora siamica)和新引进西番莲(P1 coccinea)花外蜜虫与食草动物相互作用系统变化的响应差异。共有24种蚂蚁消耗EFN资源。两种西番菊的访蚁总数差异无统计学意义(V = 141 76, df= 4, P< 0101)。P1 siamica中最丰富的蚁种是Dolichoderus胸蚁,P1 coccinea中最丰富的蚁种是Paratrechina sp.食草昆虫以蜗牛、蝈蝈(拟叶类)或部分蝴蝶和飞蛾幼虫为主。P1 siamica单叶产蜜量显著高于P1 coccinea (Willcox, z= 3187, P< 0101)。本试验排除抗氧化剂对单株平均叶损失量影响不显著。排除蚂蚁、排除草食动物和排除蚂蚁+草食动物处理对EFN产量均无显著影响。总体而言,plant - ant - generalist草食动物在《云南植物学报》(英文版)2009,31 (6):543~ 550 DOI: 1013724PSP1J1 114312009109101 X):通讯作者;电子邮件:biotrans@ bn1yn1 cninfo1ne收稿日期:20090525,20090811接受发表作者简介:徐芳芳(1981)女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事植物与蚂蚁互惠关系的研究。两种西番莲对这一变化的响应没有表现出显著差异,而与专业食草动物的互动系统需要进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信