Perception of COVID-19 Vaccination Based on Health Belief Model and the Acceptance of COVID-19 Booster Vaccination

Q2 Nursing
Risma Arlyani Dewi, Jon Hafan Sutawardana, Ana Nistiandani
{"title":"Perception of COVID-19 Vaccination Based on Health Belief Model and the Acceptance of COVID-19 Booster Vaccination","authors":"Risma Arlyani Dewi, Jon Hafan Sutawardana, Ana Nistiandani","doi":"10.14710/nmjn.v13i1.47694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The COVID-19 booster vaccination proposes a spike in cases due to new infection variants. According to the Health Belief Model (HBM), vaccination acceptance is a health change behavior measured by perception. However, more information is needed about the relationship between public perception and future acceptance of the COVID-19 booster vaccination.Purpose: This research aimed to analyze the relationship between the perception of COVID-19 vaccination based on the HBM and the acceptance of COVID-19 booster vaccination.Methods: The research used observational analytics design with a cross-sectional approach conducted at the community of a public health center in Jember Regency, Indonesia. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 387 respondents. The inclusion criteria were people aged >18 who had received a complete primary vaccination. The research instruments consisted of some questionnaires: respondent characteristics, perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination based on the HBM, and the acceptance of COVID-19 booster vaccination. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and a logistic regression test.Results: The results showed that most respondents accepted the COVID-19 booster vaccine (67.4%). There was a significant relationship between perception’s subscales of COVID-19 vaccination, such as perceived susceptibility (p=0.001), perceived severity (p=0.001), perceived benefits (p=0.001), perceived barriers (p=0.001), cues to action (p=0.001) and the acceptance of the COVID-19 booster vaccination. Cues to action were the most dominant factor related to the acceptance of the COVID-19 booster vaccination (OR=5.265; 95%CI=3.073-9.022; p<0.001).Conclusion: Positive perceptions of all HBM subscales, which showed a good perception in the community, indicated the high acceptance of the COVID-19 booster vaccine. For clinical practice, this research can be developed by surveying patients who have comorbidities.","PeriodicalId":36409,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Media Journal of Nursing","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Media Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14710/nmjn.v13i1.47694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 booster vaccination proposes a spike in cases due to new infection variants. According to the Health Belief Model (HBM), vaccination acceptance is a health change behavior measured by perception. However, more information is needed about the relationship between public perception and future acceptance of the COVID-19 booster vaccination.Purpose: This research aimed to analyze the relationship between the perception of COVID-19 vaccination based on the HBM and the acceptance of COVID-19 booster vaccination.Methods: The research used observational analytics design with a cross-sectional approach conducted at the community of a public health center in Jember Regency, Indonesia. Purposive sampling was used to recruit 387 respondents. The inclusion criteria were people aged >18 who had received a complete primary vaccination. The research instruments consisted of some questionnaires: respondent characteristics, perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination based on the HBM, and the acceptance of COVID-19 booster vaccination. Data were analyzed using Chi-square and a logistic regression test.Results: The results showed that most respondents accepted the COVID-19 booster vaccine (67.4%). There was a significant relationship between perception’s subscales of COVID-19 vaccination, such as perceived susceptibility (p=0.001), perceived severity (p=0.001), perceived benefits (p=0.001), perceived barriers (p=0.001), cues to action (p=0.001) and the acceptance of the COVID-19 booster vaccination. Cues to action were the most dominant factor related to the acceptance of the COVID-19 booster vaccination (OR=5.265; 95%CI=3.073-9.022; p<0.001).Conclusion: Positive perceptions of all HBM subscales, which showed a good perception in the community, indicated the high acceptance of the COVID-19 booster vaccine. For clinical practice, this research can be developed by surveying patients who have comorbidities.
基于健康信念模型的COVID-19疫苗接种认知与COVID-19强化疫苗接受度
背景:COVID-19加强疫苗接种可能导致新的感染变异病例激增。根据健康信念模型(HBM),疫苗接种接受是一种通过感知来衡量的健康改变行为。然而,需要更多的信息来了解公众认知与未来接受COVID-19加强疫苗接种之间的关系。目的:本研究旨在分析基于HBM的COVID-19疫苗接种认知与COVID-19加强疫苗接受度之间的关系。方法:本研究采用观察分析设计,采用横断面方法在印度尼西亚Jember Regency的一家公共卫生中心社区进行。采用目的抽样法,共招募387名调查对象。纳入标准是年龄>18岁且接受过完整的一次疫苗接种的人群。研究工具包括调查问卷:受访者特征、基于HBM的COVID-19疫苗接种认知、COVID-19加强疫苗接种接受程度。数据分析采用卡方检验和逻辑回归检验。结果:调查结果显示,接受新型冠状病毒肺炎加强疫苗接种的人数最多(67.4%)。COVID-19疫苗接种的感知子量表,如感知易感性(p=0.001)、感知严重性(p=0.001)、感知益处(p=0.001)、感知障碍(p=0.001)、行动提示(p=0.001)与接受COVID-19加强疫苗接种之间存在显著关系。行动提示是影响接受COVID-19加强疫苗接种的最主要因素(OR=5.265;95%可信区间= 3.073 - -9.022;p < 0.001)。结论:HBM各分量表均呈阳性,社区对新冠肺炎加强疫苗的接受程度较高。对于临床实践,这项研究可以通过调查有合并症的患者来发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing
Nurse Media Journal of Nursing Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信