Non-Chemical Methods for Downhole Control of Carbonate and Sulphate Scales - An Alternative Approach to Scale Management?

S. Heath, M. Ruslan, Eric McKay, Oleg Ishkov
{"title":"Non-Chemical Methods for Downhole Control of Carbonate and Sulphate Scales - An Alternative Approach to Scale Management?","authors":"S. Heath, M. Ruslan, Eric McKay, Oleg Ishkov","doi":"10.2118/190706-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The deposition of carbonate and sulphate scales is a major problem during oil and gas production. Managing scale with chemical application methods involving either scale prevention and/or removal are the preferred methods of maintaining well production. However, chemical scale control is not always an option, depending upon the nature of the reservoir and well completion and, in cases of severe scaling, the problem can render chemical treatments uneconomic unless other non-chemical methods are utilised.\n A variety of non-chemical scale control methods exist, the most common being injection of low salinity brines or low sulphate seawater (LSSW) using reverse osmosis and a sulphate removal plant (SRP) respectively. In addition, careful mixing of lift gas, produced waters and reinjection, coatings, smart well completions with active inflow control devices (ICD) and sliding sleeves (SS) are other methods.\n All of these techniques, including combinations thereof, are currently in use and the advantages and disadvantages of the key techniques are compared to chemical methods for both carbonate and sulphate scale control. A detailed example from a North Sea field demonstrates where downhole chemical scale control has not been required through a strategy of careful mixing of lift gas, brines and produced water re-injection. This was combined with understanding fluid flow paths in the reservoir and their likely breakthrough at production wells.\n Consideration is given to the injection of smart brines to scale deep in the reservoir, and data from North Sea chalk fields shows how \"in situ\" geochemical reactions between the reservoir and the injected fluid can precipitate sulphate scales. The necessity to understand these geochemical reactions and their implications for improved oil recovery and the design of smart injection brines for scale control are discussed.\n This paper presents a comprehensive review of non-chemical methods for downhole scale control and discusses how the use of these techniques can provide alternative scale management strategies through minimising or alleviating the need for downhole chemical treatments.","PeriodicalId":10969,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Thu, June 21, 2018","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Thu, June 21, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/190706-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The deposition of carbonate and sulphate scales is a major problem during oil and gas production. Managing scale with chemical application methods involving either scale prevention and/or removal are the preferred methods of maintaining well production. However, chemical scale control is not always an option, depending upon the nature of the reservoir and well completion and, in cases of severe scaling, the problem can render chemical treatments uneconomic unless other non-chemical methods are utilised. A variety of non-chemical scale control methods exist, the most common being injection of low salinity brines or low sulphate seawater (LSSW) using reverse osmosis and a sulphate removal plant (SRP) respectively. In addition, careful mixing of lift gas, produced waters and reinjection, coatings, smart well completions with active inflow control devices (ICD) and sliding sleeves (SS) are other methods. All of these techniques, including combinations thereof, are currently in use and the advantages and disadvantages of the key techniques are compared to chemical methods for both carbonate and sulphate scale control. A detailed example from a North Sea field demonstrates where downhole chemical scale control has not been required through a strategy of careful mixing of lift gas, brines and produced water re-injection. This was combined with understanding fluid flow paths in the reservoir and their likely breakthrough at production wells. Consideration is given to the injection of smart brines to scale deep in the reservoir, and data from North Sea chalk fields shows how "in situ" geochemical reactions between the reservoir and the injected fluid can precipitate sulphate scales. The necessity to understand these geochemical reactions and their implications for improved oil recovery and the design of smart injection brines for scale control are discussed. This paper presents a comprehensive review of non-chemical methods for downhole scale control and discusses how the use of these techniques can provide alternative scale management strategies through minimising or alleviating the need for downhole chemical treatments.
非化学方法控制碳酸盐岩和硫酸盐结垢——结垢管理的另一种方法?
碳酸盐岩和硫酸盐结垢沉积是油气生产中的一个主要问题。使用化学药剂来控制结垢,包括防止结垢和/或清除结垢,是维持油井生产的首选方法。然而,化学结垢控制并不总是一种选择,这取决于储层和完井的性质,在结垢严重的情况下,除非采用其他非化学方法,否则化学处理可能不经济。目前存在多种非化学控制水垢的方法,最常见的是分别利用反渗透和硫酸盐去除装置注入低盐度盐水或低硫酸盐海水。此外,其他方法还包括仔细混合举升气、产出水和回注、涂层、带有主动流入控制装置(ICD)和滑套(SS)的智能完井。所有这些技术,包括它们的组合,目前都在使用中,并将关键技术的优缺点与碳酸盐和硫酸盐结垢的化学方法进行了比较。北海油田的一个详细示例表明,通过仔细混合举升气、盐水和采出水的策略,不需要进行井下化学结垢控制。这与了解储层中的流体流动路径以及它们在生产井中的可能突破相结合。考虑到注入智能盐水可以在储层深处结垢,北海白垩油田的数据表明,储层与注入流体之间的“原位”地球化学反应可以沉淀出硫酸盐结垢。讨论了了解这些地球化学反应的必要性及其对提高采收率和设计用于结垢控制的智能注入盐水的意义。本文全面回顾了用于控制井下结垢的非化学方法,并讨论了使用这些技术如何通过减少或减轻对井下化学处理的需求来提供可替代的结垢管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信