Closing the Gap between Schools and Community: University/Community Collaboration Addresses Identified Barriers to Student Learning

Engage! Pub Date : 2023-03-08 DOI:10.18060/26750
Kate Roelecke, J. Grim, Silvia Garcia
{"title":"Closing the Gap between Schools and Community: University/Community Collaboration Addresses Identified Barriers to Student Learning","authors":"Kate Roelecke, J. Grim, Silvia Garcia","doi":"10.18060/26750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two different community-engaged groups in Indianapolis, Indiana recommended trauma-responsive school communities to address barriers to student learning. Before merging their work, both groups represented collaborations of university academics; K-12 educators; dental, mental, and basic health providers; service organizations; youth development specialists; and public school parents. The conclusions from their work were clear: address the social/ emotional and mental health, trauma and violence, chronic absenteeism, and social media distractions of students or fail to impact learning and youth development success. Central to the conclusions was the collaborative nature of the community-engaged studies, input from the field, and survey respondent discussions and analysis of what the findings really meant. A culminating report, Closing the Gap between School & Community Partnerships: An assessment of schools in Indianapolis, recommends adopting whole-child approaches, strength-based family engagement, community school models, and increased public school funding to address the barriers identified from survey responses of 354 educators throughout the city of Indianapolis. This paper focuses on how the collaborative, community-engaged process led to the report findings and recommendations.","PeriodicalId":93176,"journal":{"name":"Engage!","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engage!","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18060/26750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two different community-engaged groups in Indianapolis, Indiana recommended trauma-responsive school communities to address barriers to student learning. Before merging their work, both groups represented collaborations of university academics; K-12 educators; dental, mental, and basic health providers; service organizations; youth development specialists; and public school parents. The conclusions from their work were clear: address the social/ emotional and mental health, trauma and violence, chronic absenteeism, and social media distractions of students or fail to impact learning and youth development success. Central to the conclusions was the collaborative nature of the community-engaged studies, input from the field, and survey respondent discussions and analysis of what the findings really meant. A culminating report, Closing the Gap between School & Community Partnerships: An assessment of schools in Indianapolis, recommends adopting whole-child approaches, strength-based family engagement, community school models, and increased public school funding to address the barriers identified from survey responses of 354 educators throughout the city of Indianapolis. This paper focuses on how the collaborative, community-engaged process led to the report findings and recommendations.
缩小学校和社区之间的差距:大学/社区合作解决学生学习的障碍
印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯的两个不同的社区参与团体建议创伤响应学校社区解决学生学习的障碍。在合并他们的工作之前,这两个小组代表了大学学者的合作;k - 12教育工作者;牙科、精神和基本保健提供者;服务组织;青年发展专家;还有公立学校的家长。他们的工作得出的结论是明确的:解决学生的社会/情感和心理健康、创伤和暴力、长期缺勤和社交媒体干扰,或未能影响学习和青年发展的成功。结论的核心是社区参与研究的协作性质,来自实地的投入,以及调查受访者对研究结果真正含义的讨论和分析。一份最终报告《缩小学校与社区伙伴关系之间的差距:对印第安纳波利斯学校的评估》建议采用全员教育方法、基于力量的家庭参与、社区学校模式和增加公立学校资金,以解决印第安纳波利斯市354名教育工作者的调查反馈中发现的障碍。本文重点介绍了协作、社区参与的过程如何导致报告的发现和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信