Risk Assessment for Model and Simulation Credibility Characteristics

J. G. Madry, James N. Elele, David H. Hall, D. J. Turner
{"title":"Risk Assessment for Model and Simulation Credibility Characteristics","authors":"J. G. Madry, James N. Elele, David H. Hall, D. J. Turner","doi":"10.1115/vvs2019-5152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Department of Defense (DoD) uses the principles of risk assessment extensively throughout the acquisition process to identify, manage, and mitigate risk in many areas including software (both simulation software and software embedded in materiel systems). The approach to assessing the risks associated with using results from Models and Simulations (M&S) to influence decision-making that is described here is used by the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) 5.4H Verification, Validation, and Accreditation office.\n The focus of the risk assessment is on ten specific characteristics of M&S Capability, Accuracy, and Usability that have the most potential impact on the intended uses. In this method, the characteristics of the M&S are evaluated against standard criteria, and then assigned a color-rating of Green, Yellow, or Red based on the actual data obtained from the M&S itself. A simple computation is then used to weigh the ratings of the characteristics into the likelihood of error aspect of the risk of using the M&S. A thorough understanding of the M&S and its application is a prerequisite to using this approach since the analyst is required to provide a technical justification for the rating assigned to a characteristic. Should the assigned rating for a characteristic of the M&S not be green, the analyst is required to recommend actions and/or mitigations for the M&S developer to take that would improve the rating to green.","PeriodicalId":87343,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ASME Verification and Validation Symposium -2019- : VVS2019 : presented at ASME 2019 Verification and Validation Symposium, May 15-17, 2019, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. ASME Verification and Validation Symposium (2019 : L...","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ASME Verification and Validation Symposium -2019- : VVS2019 : presented at ASME 2019 Verification and Validation Symposium, May 15-17, 2019, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. ASME Verification and Validation Symposium (2019 : L...","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/vvs2019-5152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Department of Defense (DoD) uses the principles of risk assessment extensively throughout the acquisition process to identify, manage, and mitigate risk in many areas including software (both simulation software and software embedded in materiel systems). The approach to assessing the risks associated with using results from Models and Simulations (M&S) to influence decision-making that is described here is used by the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) 5.4H Verification, Validation, and Accreditation office. The focus of the risk assessment is on ten specific characteristics of M&S Capability, Accuracy, and Usability that have the most potential impact on the intended uses. In this method, the characteristics of the M&S are evaluated against standard criteria, and then assigned a color-rating of Green, Yellow, or Red based on the actual data obtained from the M&S itself. A simple computation is then used to weigh the ratings of the characteristics into the likelihood of error aspect of the risk of using the M&S. A thorough understanding of the M&S and its application is a prerequisite to using this approach since the analyst is required to provide a technical justification for the rating assigned to a characteristic. Should the assigned rating for a characteristic of the M&S not be green, the analyst is required to recommend actions and/or mitigations for the M&S developer to take that would improve the rating to green.
模型与仿真可信度特征的风险评估
美国国防部(DoD)在整个采买过程中广泛使用风险评估原则,以识别、管理和减轻许多领域的风险,包括软件(模拟软件和嵌入材料系统的软件)。海军航空系统司令部(NAVAIR) 5.4H验证、验证和认证办公室采用了本文所描述的使用模型和模拟(M&S)结果来影响决策的风险评估方法。风险评估的重点是M&S的能力、准确性和可用性的十个特定特征,这些特征对预期的用途有最潜在的影响。在这种方法中,根据标准标准评估M&S的特征,然后根据从M&S本身获得的实际数据分配绿色,黄色或红色的颜色等级。然后使用一个简单的计算来将特征的评级衡量为使用M&S风险的错误可能性方面。全面了解M&S及其应用程序是使用此方法的先决条件,因为分析师需要为分配给特征的评级提供技术理由。如果为M&S的某个特性分配的评级不是绿色的,则分析师需要向M&S开发人员推荐可以将评级提高到绿色的操作和/或缓解措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书