Bit Error Rate Comparison for Radio Frequency Interconnection Based on BPSK, PAM and QAM Modulation

Ngu War Hlaing, A. Farzamnia
{"title":"Bit Error Rate Comparison for Radio Frequency Interconnection Based on BPSK, PAM and QAM Modulation","authors":"Ngu War Hlaing, A. Farzamnia","doi":"10.1109/SCOReD53546.2021.9652745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advancement of Ultra Large-Scale Integration (ULSI) technology has motivated the need to find an alternative solution such as wireless communication and on-chip Radio Frequency (RF), a popular method to substitute the hardwired metal interconnect that has reached its performance limit due to material limitations. Single-input-single-output schemes such as Binary Pulse Shift Keying (BPSK) modulation, Phase Amplitude Modulation (PAM), and Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) implemented with the RF interconnect has increased its advantages. However, the type of channel used is still unclear. Thus, this paper evaluated the Bit Error Rate (BER) of these three modulation types under Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) and Rayleigh multipath fading channels. The findings indicate that BPSK delivers the highest BER performance on the AWGN channel, while 8-ary PAM and 64-ary QAM output attain the best BER on the Rayleigh channels, irrespective of its signal-to-noise proportion (SNR). Comparing AWGN and Rayleigh channels shows that AWGN offers the highest BER performance regardless of the modulation techniques and SNR. Thus, BPSK achieves better BER performance in the AWGN channel.","PeriodicalId":6762,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 19th Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD)","volume":"20 1","pages":"445-449"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 19th Student Conference on Research and Development (SCOReD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SCOReD53546.2021.9652745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advancement of Ultra Large-Scale Integration (ULSI) technology has motivated the need to find an alternative solution such as wireless communication and on-chip Radio Frequency (RF), a popular method to substitute the hardwired metal interconnect that has reached its performance limit due to material limitations. Single-input-single-output schemes such as Binary Pulse Shift Keying (BPSK) modulation, Phase Amplitude Modulation (PAM), and Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) implemented with the RF interconnect has increased its advantages. However, the type of channel used is still unclear. Thus, this paper evaluated the Bit Error Rate (BER) of these three modulation types under Additive White Gaussian Noise (AWGN) and Rayleigh multipath fading channels. The findings indicate that BPSK delivers the highest BER performance on the AWGN channel, while 8-ary PAM and 64-ary QAM output attain the best BER on the Rayleigh channels, irrespective of its signal-to-noise proportion (SNR). Comparing AWGN and Rayleigh channels shows that AWGN offers the highest BER performance regardless of the modulation techniques and SNR. Thus, BPSK achieves better BER performance in the AWGN channel.
基于BPSK、PAM和QAM调制的射频互连误码率比较
超大规模集成(ULSI)技术的进步促使人们需要寻找一种替代解决方案,如无线通信和片上射频(RF),这是一种流行的方法,以取代由于材料限制而达到性能极限的硬线金属互连。单输入-单输出方案,如二进制脉冲移位键控(BPSK)调制,相位幅度调制(PAM)和正交幅度调制(QAM)实现与射频互连增加了其优势。然而,使用的渠道类型仍不清楚。因此,本文对加性高斯白噪声和瑞利多径衰落信道下这三种调制方式的误码率(BER)进行了评价。结果表明,无论信噪比(SNR)如何,BPSK在AWGN信道上的误码率最高,而8-ary PAM和64-ary QAM输出在瑞利信道上的误码率最高。比较AWGN和瑞利信道表明,无论调制技术和信噪比如何,AWGN都具有最高的BER性能。因此,BPSK在AWGN信道中获得了更好的误码率性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信