Insecurities in EU border management: The unintended consequences of securitization processes in the Mediterranean

IF 0.6 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Vanda Amaro Dias, M. Freire
{"title":"Insecurities in EU border management: The unintended consequences of securitization processes in the Mediterranean","authors":"Vanda Amaro Dias, M. Freire","doi":"10.17502/mrcs.v10i2.561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this article is to shed light on how securitization processes at the European Union (EU)’s southern borders – the Mediterranean – are feeding various insecurities both inside and outside the EU. We follow a sociological approach to securitization which revisits the work by Thierry Balzacq. By adding to the conceptualization of securitization processes as speech acts and the outcome of security practices, this approach contributes to understanding how specific responses to perceived security threats result from contextual dynamics and power relations between significant actors in the security field. The article lies at the convergence of the fields of Anthropology and International Relations adding to efforts to promote a critical reflection about processes of (in)securitization and emancipatory possibilities for social change. The article concludes that the insecurity narratives feeding border dynamics end up in a spiral of insecurity perceptions with implications for borders’ management. The need to desecuritize policies and practices becomes, thus, part of the way to rethink possibilities for addressing the structural causes of violence and mass dislocation of people at the southern borders of the EU.","PeriodicalId":41104,"journal":{"name":"Methaodos-Revista de Ciencias Sociales","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methaodos-Revista de Ciencias Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17502/mrcs.v10i2.561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this article is to shed light on how securitization processes at the European Union (EU)’s southern borders – the Mediterranean – are feeding various insecurities both inside and outside the EU. We follow a sociological approach to securitization which revisits the work by Thierry Balzacq. By adding to the conceptualization of securitization processes as speech acts and the outcome of security practices, this approach contributes to understanding how specific responses to perceived security threats result from contextual dynamics and power relations between significant actors in the security field. The article lies at the convergence of the fields of Anthropology and International Relations adding to efforts to promote a critical reflection about processes of (in)securitization and emancipatory possibilities for social change. The article concludes that the insecurity narratives feeding border dynamics end up in a spiral of insecurity perceptions with implications for borders’ management. The need to desecuritize policies and practices becomes, thus, part of the way to rethink possibilities for addressing the structural causes of violence and mass dislocation of people at the southern borders of the EU.
欧盟边境管理中的不安全:地中海证券化进程的意外后果
本文的目的是阐明欧盟(EU)南部边界——地中海——的证券化进程如何助长了欧盟内外的各种不安全感。我们遵循证券化的社会学方法,重新审视蒂埃里·巴尔扎克的工作。通过将证券化过程概念化为言语行为和安全实践的结果,这种方法有助于理解对感知到的安全威胁的具体反应是如何从安全领域中重要参与者之间的上下文动态和权力关系中产生的。这篇文章是人类学和国际关系领域的融合,旨在促进对社会变革的证券化和解放可能性过程的批判性反思。文章的结论是,助长边境动态的不安全叙事最终会导致对边境管理产生影响的不安全认知的螺旋式上升。因此,有必要将政策和做法非合法化,这是重新思考解决欧盟南部边境暴力和大规模流离失所的结构性原因的可能性的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信