Analyzing the quality of ophthalmic nursing research

Marion Allen PhD, RN, Barbara Astle MN, RN , Jean Burt MN, RN
{"title":"Analyzing the quality of ophthalmic nursing research","authors":"Marion Allen PhD, RN,&nbsp;Barbara Astle MN, RN ,&nbsp;Jean Burt MN, RN","doi":"10.1016/S1060-135X(00)90029-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this project was to describe, classify, and analyze ophthalmic nursing research published between 1975 and 1996. Sixty-six quantitative research articles were reviewed. This mainly descriptive body of research covered such topics as assessment/screening, self-care, and risk factors. The research articles were generally rated as superior or average, with many of the average being at the low end of the scale. Twenty-eight percent of the research was not applicable to nursing practice, and 42% had low or no theoretical relevance to nursing. This review will help to establish a research agenda in the area of ophthalmic nursing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100677,"journal":{"name":"Insight - the Journal of the American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 7-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1060-135X(00)90029-0","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insight - the Journal of the American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060135X00900290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to describe, classify, and analyze ophthalmic nursing research published between 1975 and 1996. Sixty-six quantitative research articles were reviewed. This mainly descriptive body of research covered such topics as assessment/screening, self-care, and risk factors. The research articles were generally rated as superior or average, with many of the average being at the low end of the scale. Twenty-eight percent of the research was not applicable to nursing practice, and 42% had low or no theoretical relevance to nursing. This review will help to establish a research agenda in the area of ophthalmic nursing.

眼科护理质量分析研究
本项目的目的是描述、分类和分析1975年至1996年间发表的眼科护理研究。本文综述了66篇定量研究论文。这主要是描述性的研究主体,涵盖了评估/筛选、自我保健和风险因素等主题。研究文章通常被评为优秀或平均,其中许多平均处于量表的低端。28%的研究不适用于护理实践,42%的研究与护理的理论相关性较低或没有理论相关性。这篇综述将有助于在眼科护理领域建立一个研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书