Evaluation of High-Tech Industry Using Fuzzy ARAS Method

IF 2.8 4区生物学

3 Biotech Pub Date : 2022-12-10 DOI:10.46632/daai/2/3/3

{"title":"Evaluation of High-Tech Industry Using Fuzzy ARAS\nMethod","authors":"","doi":"10.46632/daai/2/3/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, High technology capacity planning and related to management we review the literature. Using the backdrop of the competitive. Strategic, tactical and operational perspectives. In the field of high technology Product innovation for a sample of 121 firms and the relationship between firm survival. To choose their freight delivery concept \ncan be used by companies it provides a method. Advanced Extension of Additional Rate Assessment (ARAS) Method Rake distribution concept was developed to solve Exam problem. implementation of Based in Czech Republic tire manufacturing company is taken as a case. Despite the study, the proposed picture denouncing the ARAS method is general and any other company can use it. To verify the novel image denouncing the ARAS method, with nine state-of-the-art image fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods a comparative analysis is presented. Alternatives is Technological factors (TF), Economic factors (EF), Social (personnel) Factors (SF). Evaluation Parameter is biomedical micro electromechanical systems (BioMEMS) (C1), Nano technology (C2), Biotechnology (C3), Biomedical engineering (C4). In this type of analysis, Fuzzy ARAS methods determine for the best solution to the negative Short distance and very long\ndistance to settlement, but Comparison of these distances doesn’t underestimate the importance. As a result, Technological factors (TF) is first rank, and Social (personnel) Factors (SF) is lowest rank.","PeriodicalId":48765,"journal":{"name":"3 Biotech","volume":"59 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3 Biotech","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46632/daai/2/3/3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, High technology capacity planning and related to management we review the literature. Using the backdrop of the competitive. Strategic, tactical and operational perspectives. In the field of high technology Product innovation for a sample of 121 firms and the relationship between firm survival. To choose their freight delivery concept can be used by companies it provides a method. Advanced Extension of Additional Rate Assessment (ARAS) Method Rake distribution concept was developed to solve Exam problem. implementation of Based in Czech Republic tire manufacturing company is taken as a case. Despite the study, the proposed picture denouncing the ARAS method is general and any other company can use it. To verify the novel image denouncing the ARAS method, with nine state-of-the-art image fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods a comparative analysis is presented. Alternatives is Technological factors (TF), Economic factors (EF), Social (personnel) Factors (SF). Evaluation Parameter is biomedical micro electromechanical systems (BioMEMS) (C1), Nano technology (C2), Biotechnology (C3), Biomedical engineering (C4). In this type of analysis, Fuzzy ARAS methods determine for the best solution to the negative Short distance and very long distance to settlement, but Comparison of these distances doesn’t underestimate the importance. As a result, Technological factors (TF) is first rank, and Social (personnel) Factors (SF) is lowest rank.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于模糊aras法的高新技术产业评价

本文对高技术能力规划与管理相关的文献进行了综述。以竞争为背景。战略、战术和操作角度。以高新技术领域121家企业为样本，研究了产品创新与企业生存的关系。选择自己的货运理念可以为企业提供一种使用方法。为了解决考试问题，提出了Rake分布的概念。并以捷克轮胎制造公司为例进行了案例分析。尽管有这项研究，但提议的谴责ARAS方法的图片是通用的，任何其他公司都可以使用它。为了验证该方法的有效性，与目前常用的9种图像模糊多准则决策方法进行了对比分析。可供选择的因素有技术因素(TF)、经济因素(EF)、社会(人员)因素(SF)。评价参数为生物医学微机电系统(BioMEMS) (C1)、纳米技术(C2)、生物技术(C3)、生物医学工程(C4)。在这种类型的分析中，模糊ARAS方法确定了最优解为负短距离和极长距离的定居点，但这些距离的比较并不低估其重要性。因此，技术因素(TF)排名第一，社会(人员)因素(SF)排名最低。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

3 Biotech BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-

自引率

0.00%

发文量

314

期刊介绍： 3 Biotech publishes the results of the latest research related to the study and application of biotechnology to: - Medicine and Biomedical Sciences - Agriculture - The Environment The focus on these three technology sectors recognizes that complete Biotechnology applications often require a combination of techniques. 3 Biotech not only presents the latest developments in biotechnology but also addresses the problems and benefits of integrating a variety of techniques for a particular application. 3 Biotech will appeal to scientists and engineers in both academia and industry focused on the safe and efficient application of Biotechnology to Medicine, Agriculture and the Environment.