Oral Health in Women with a History of High Gestational Diabetes Risk.

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Hanna Poulsen, Jukka H Meurman, Hannu Kautiainen, Anna Maria Heikkinen, Emilia Huvinen, Saila Koivusalo, Johan G Eriksson
{"title":"Oral Health in Women with a History of High Gestational Diabetes Risk.","authors":"Hanna Poulsen, Jukka H Meurman, Hannu Kautiainen, Anna Maria Heikkinen, Emilia Huvinen, Saila Koivusalo, Johan G Eriksson","doi":"10.3390/dj7030092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We studied oral health in 115 women with and without a history of gestational diabetes (GDM), expecting poorer oral health in the GDM group. Full-mouth examinations were performed 5 years postpartum and the number of teeth, total dental index (TDI) and decayed, missing, filled teeth (DMFT) index were calculated. Bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), visible plaque index (VPI), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded. The periodontal inflammatory burden index (PIBI) was calculated. Panoramic radiographs were taken and signs of infections recorded. Oral health habits, symptoms and participants' own opinion of oral health were recorded with questionnaires. At the time of examination, 45% of the women had a history of GDM in the index pregnancy. Mild periodontitis (62%) and bleeding on probing (46%) were common. VPI (13% and 17%, <i>p</i> = 0.009) and PIBI (13.1 and 17.5, <i>p</i> = 0.041) were lower among women with a history of GDM compared with those with no history of GDM. There was no difference between groups in DMFT scores. All women reported good subjective oral health. Thus, contrary to our hypothesis, women with a history of GDM showed better oral health parameters than women without a history of GDM.</p>","PeriodicalId":47284,"journal":{"name":"Open Dentistry Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6784739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We studied oral health in 115 women with and without a history of gestational diabetes (GDM), expecting poorer oral health in the GDM group. Full-mouth examinations were performed 5 years postpartum and the number of teeth, total dental index (TDI) and decayed, missing, filled teeth (DMFT) index were calculated. Bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), visible plaque index (VPI), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were recorded. The periodontal inflammatory burden index (PIBI) was calculated. Panoramic radiographs were taken and signs of infections recorded. Oral health habits, symptoms and participants' own opinion of oral health were recorded with questionnaires. At the time of examination, 45% of the women had a history of GDM in the index pregnancy. Mild periodontitis (62%) and bleeding on probing (46%) were common. VPI (13% and 17%, p = 0.009) and PIBI (13.1 and 17.5, p = 0.041) were lower among women with a history of GDM compared with those with no history of GDM. There was no difference between groups in DMFT scores. All women reported good subjective oral health. Thus, contrary to our hypothesis, women with a history of GDM showed better oral health parameters than women without a history of GDM.

有妊娠糖尿病高风险史的妇女的口腔健康。
我们对 115 名有妊娠糖尿病(GDM)病史和无妊娠糖尿病(GDM)病史的妇女的口腔健康状况进行了研究,结果发现 GDM 组妇女的口腔健康状况较差。我们在产后 5 年进行了全口检查,并计算了牙齿数量、牙齿总指数(TDI)和蛀牙、缺牙、补牙指数(DMFT)。记录探诊出血(BOP)、探诊深度(PD)、可见菌斑指数(VPI)和临床附着水平(CAL)。计算牙周炎症负担指数(PIBI)。拍摄全景X光片并记录感染迹象。通过调查问卷记录口腔健康习惯、症状和参与者本人对口腔健康的看法。在进行检查时,45% 的妇女在初次怀孕时有过 GDM 病史。轻度牙周炎(62%)和探诊出血(46%)很常见。与无 GDM 史的妇女相比,有 GDM 史的妇女的 VPI(13% 和 17%,P = 0.009)和 PIBI(13.1 和 17.5,P = 0.041)更低。组间的 DMFT 评分没有差异。所有妇女的主观口腔健康状况均良好。因此,与我们的假设相反,与无 GDM 史的妇女相比,有 GDM 史的妇女的口腔健康指标更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Dentistry Journal
Open Dentistry Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信