AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE OPTIMUM REPLACEMENT RATIO OF COARSE GRAVEL WITH EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BEADS IN CONCRETE

Q3 Engineering
Anmar H. Salih, Hussain Dhafir Hussain, A. A. G. Abu Altemen, Nibras Z Jameel
{"title":"AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE OPTIMUM REPLACEMENT RATIO OF COARSE GRAVEL WITH EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BEADS IN CONCRETE","authors":"Anmar H. Salih, Hussain Dhafir Hussain, A. A. G. Abu Altemen, Nibras Z Jameel","doi":"10.5937/jaes0-39842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Previous researches have shown that partial replacement of aggregates with Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) in concrete mixes reduces both the density and compressive strength of concrete, but enhances its durability. As there is no effort was made to determine the optimum EPS/gravel replacement ratio in a concrete mixture, this study triedl to determine this ratio. An experimental investigation is performed by using six different concrete mixes produced by partially replacing gravel with an equivalent volume of EPS beads. The adopted volumetric replacement ratios of coarse aggregate by EPS were (11%, 22%, 33%, 44%, and 55%). The results indicated that A drop in the density of both the fresh and hardened concrete was found to be in the range (of 0% to 35%) compared to the corresponding density value of the base mix (without EPS). Concrete compressive strength was also found to drop in the range (0% to 91%) compared with the corresponding value of the base mix. Within the limit of this work, it was found that the 22% replacement volumetric ratio of coarse aggregate with EPS is the optimum ratio based on a ratio of the drop in density to the drop in compressive strength. Generally, it was concluded that the optimum volumetric replacement ratio lies between 15% to 30%, according to the comparison with other prior studies.","PeriodicalId":35468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Engineering Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Engineering Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes0-39842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous researches have shown that partial replacement of aggregates with Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) in concrete mixes reduces both the density and compressive strength of concrete, but enhances its durability. As there is no effort was made to determine the optimum EPS/gravel replacement ratio in a concrete mixture, this study triedl to determine this ratio. An experimental investigation is performed by using six different concrete mixes produced by partially replacing gravel with an equivalent volume of EPS beads. The adopted volumetric replacement ratios of coarse aggregate by EPS were (11%, 22%, 33%, 44%, and 55%). The results indicated that A drop in the density of both the fresh and hardened concrete was found to be in the range (of 0% to 35%) compared to the corresponding density value of the base mix (without EPS). Concrete compressive strength was also found to drop in the range (0% to 91%) compared with the corresponding value of the base mix. Within the limit of this work, it was found that the 22% replacement volumetric ratio of coarse aggregate with EPS is the optimum ratio based on a ratio of the drop in density to the drop in compressive strength. Generally, it was concluded that the optimum volumetric replacement ratio lies between 15% to 30%, according to the comparison with other prior studies.
混凝土中粗砾石与膨胀聚苯乙烯微珠最佳替代比的试验研究
以往的研究表明,用膨胀聚苯乙烯(EPS)代替部分集料会降低混凝土的密度和抗压强度,但会提高混凝土的耐久性。由于没有努力确定混凝土混合料中EPS/砾石的最佳替代比,因此本研究试图确定该比例。通过使用六种不同的混凝土混合料进行了实验研究,这些混合料是用等量的EPS微珠部分代替砾石制成的。采用EPS代替粗骨料的体积比分别为(11%、22%、33%、44%和55%)。结果表明,与未加EPS的基层混合料相比,新拌混凝土和硬化混凝土的密度下降幅度在0%至35%之间。混凝土抗压强度与相应的基层配合比也下降了0% ~ 91%。在本工作的范围内,根据密度下降与抗压强度下降的比值,发现EPS替代粗骨料的体积比为22%是最佳比例。通过与前人的研究对比,一般认为最佳的体积替代比在15% ~ 30%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Engineering Science
Journal of Applied Engineering Science Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 2002 iipp build cooperation with its clients established on wealthy experience, interchangeable respect and trust and permanently arrangement with the purpose of successfully realization of projects recognizable according to good organization and high quality of provided favors. Working as unique team of highly motivated experts, Institute iipp provides to its customers the most high-quality solutions in domain of engineering consulting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信