Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse

P. Gordon, B. Grosz, L. A. Gilliom
{"title":"Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse","authors":"P. Gordon, B. Grosz, L. A. Gilliom","doi":"10.1207/s15516709cog1703_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Centering theory, developed within computational linguistics, provides an account of ways in which patterns of interutterance reference can promote the local coherence of discourse. It states that each utterance in a coherent discourse segment contains a single semantic entity—the backward-looking center—that provides a link to the previous utterance, and an ordered set of entities—the forward-looking centers—that offer potential links to the next utterance. We report five reading-time experiments that test predictions of this theory with respect to the conditions under which it is preferable to realize (refer to) an entity using a pronoun rather than a repeated definite description or name. The experiments show that there is a single backward-looking center that is preferentially realized as a pronoun, and that the backward-looking center is typically realized as the grammatical subject of the utterance. They also provide evidence that there is a set of forward-looking centers that is ranked in terms of prominence, and that a key factor in determining prominence—surface-initial position—does not affect determination of the backward-looking center. This provides evidence for the dissociation of the coherence processes of looking backward and looking forward.","PeriodicalId":89752,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive sciences","volume":"58 1","pages":"311-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"684","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1703_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 684

Abstract

Centering theory, developed within computational linguistics, provides an account of ways in which patterns of interutterance reference can promote the local coherence of discourse. It states that each utterance in a coherent discourse segment contains a single semantic entity—the backward-looking center—that provides a link to the previous utterance, and an ordered set of entities—the forward-looking centers—that offer potential links to the next utterance. We report five reading-time experiments that test predictions of this theory with respect to the conditions under which it is preferable to realize (refer to) an entity using a pronoun rather than a repeated definite description or name. The experiments show that there is a single backward-looking center that is preferentially realized as a pronoun, and that the backward-looking center is typically realized as the grammatical subject of the utterance. They also provide evidence that there is a set of forward-looking centers that is ranked in terms of prominence, and that a key factor in determining prominence—surface-initial position—does not affect determination of the backward-looking center. This provides evidence for the dissociation of the coherence processes of looking backward and looking forward.
代词、人名与语篇中注意力的集中
中心理论,在计算语言学中发展起来,提供了一种方式的解释,在这种方式中,话语引用模式可以促进话语的局部连贯。它指出,连贯话语片段中的每个话语都包含一个单一的语义实体——向后看中心——它提供了与前一个话语的链接,以及一组有序的实体——前瞻性中心——它提供了与下一个话语的潜在链接。我们报告了五个阅读时间实验,这些实验测试了这一理论的预测,在哪些条件下,使用代词而不是重复的确定描述或名称来实现(引用)实体更可取。实验表明,有一个向后看的中心优先被实现为代词,向后看的中心通常被实现为话语的语法主语。他们还提供了证据,证明有一组前视中心是根据突出程度来排序的,而且确定突出程度的关键因素——表面——初始位置——并不影响对后视中心的确定。这为向后看和向前看的连贯过程的分离提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书