“Life is already hard enough”: Lesbian and gay adoptive parents’ experiences and concerns after the 2016 presidential election.

IF 1.9 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Kaitlin Gabriele-Black, A. Goldberg, Melissa H. Manley, Reihonna L. Frost
{"title":"“Life is already hard enough”: Lesbian and gay adoptive parents’ experiences and concerns after the 2016 presidential election.","authors":"Kaitlin Gabriele-Black, A. Goldberg, Melissa H. Manley, Reihonna L. Frost","doi":"10.1037/CFP0000162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2016 U.S. presidential election was an especially difficult election for many Americans, particularly individuals with one or more marginalized identities. This qualitative study explores the experiences of sexual minority adoptive parents (n = 50), many of whom were members of multiracial families. Parents completed an online survey 2–3 weeks after the November 2016 presidential election, and 2.5 months later (1–2 weeks after the January 2017 inauguration). Through an integrated minority stress and intersectional theory lens, we examined participants’ emotional responses to this stressful, ambiguous political event, their perceptions of how immediate and extended family relationships shifted during the election and its aftermath, and how they coped with stress, including relationship stress, exacerbated by the election and the political climate. Most participants reported experiencing negative emotions such as fear/ anxiety, anger, and sadness upon learning the outcome of the election. Many participants reported that the election impacted family dynamics, including conflict with extended family, partners, or children. Adoptive sexual minority parents coped in a variety of ways, including by pursuing activism, connecting with others, and disengaging from thinking about the election. These findings have implications for howmental health care providers may support adoptive sexual minority parent families to cope with stressful political events.","PeriodicalId":45636,"journal":{"name":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","volume":"43 1","pages":"103-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Couple and Family Psychology-Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/CFP0000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The 2016 U.S. presidential election was an especially difficult election for many Americans, particularly individuals with one or more marginalized identities. This qualitative study explores the experiences of sexual minority adoptive parents (n = 50), many of whom were members of multiracial families. Parents completed an online survey 2–3 weeks after the November 2016 presidential election, and 2.5 months later (1–2 weeks after the January 2017 inauguration). Through an integrated minority stress and intersectional theory lens, we examined participants’ emotional responses to this stressful, ambiguous political event, their perceptions of how immediate and extended family relationships shifted during the election and its aftermath, and how they coped with stress, including relationship stress, exacerbated by the election and the political climate. Most participants reported experiencing negative emotions such as fear/ anxiety, anger, and sadness upon learning the outcome of the election. Many participants reported that the election impacted family dynamics, including conflict with extended family, partners, or children. Adoptive sexual minority parents coped in a variety of ways, including by pursuing activism, connecting with others, and disengaging from thinking about the election. These findings have implications for howmental health care providers may support adoptive sexual minority parent families to cope with stressful political events.
“生活已经够艰难了”:2016年总统大选后同性恋养父母的经历和担忧。
2016年美国总统大选对许多美国人来说是一场特别艰难的选举,尤其是那些有一个或多个边缘化身份的人。这项定性研究探讨了性取向少数的养父母(n = 50)的经历,其中许多是多种族家庭的成员。家长们分别在2016年11月总统大选后2-3周和2.5个月后(2017年1月就职后1-2周)完成了在线调查。通过综合的少数民族压力和交叉理论镜头,我们研究了参与者对这一压力,模糊的政治事件的情绪反应,他们对选举及其后果期间直系亲属和大家庭关系如何变化的看法,以及他们如何应对压力,包括因选举和政治气候而加剧的关系压力。大多数参与者报告说,在得知选举结果后,他们经历了恐惧/焦虑、愤怒和悲伤等负面情绪。许多参与者报告说,选举影响了家庭的动态,包括与大家庭、伴侣或孩子的冲突。性取向少数的养父母采取了多种应对方式,包括采取行动、与他人联系,以及不去考虑选举。这些发现对精神卫生保健提供者如何支持收养性少数的父母家庭应对紧张的政治事件具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice ® (CFP) is a scholarly journal publishing peer-reviewed papers representing the science and practice of family psychology. CFP is the official publication of APA Division 43 (Society for Couple and Family Psychology) and is intended to be a forum for scholarly dialogue regarding the most important emerging issues in the field, a primary outlet for research particularly as it impacts practice and for papers regarding education, public policy, and the identity of the profession of family psychology. As the official journal for the Society, CFP will provide a home for the members of the division and those in other fields interested in the most cutting edge issues in family psychology. Unlike other journals in the field, CFP is focused specifically on family psychology as a specialty practice, unique scientific domain, and critical element of psychological knowledge. CFP will seek and publish scholarly manuscripts that make a contribution to the knowledge base of family psychology specifically, and the science and practice of working with individuals, couples and families from a family systems perspective in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信