Risk bounds for the majority vote: from a PAC-Bayesian analysis to a learning algorithm

Pascal Germain, A. Lacasse, François Laviolette, M. Marchand, Jean-Francis Roy
{"title":"Risk bounds for the majority vote: from a PAC-Bayesian analysis to a learning algorithm","authors":"Pascal Germain, A. Lacasse, François Laviolette, M. Marchand, Jean-Francis Roy","doi":"10.5555/2789272.2831140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose an extensive analysis of the behavior of majority votes in binary classification. In particular, we introduce a risk bound for majority votes, called the C-bound, that takes into account the average quality of the voters and their average disagreement. We also propose an extensive PAC-Bayesian analysis that shows how the C-bound can be estimated from various observations contained in the training data. The analysis intends to be self-contained and can be used as introductory material to PAC-Bayesian statistical learning theory. It starts from a general PAC-Bayesian perspective and ends with uncommon PAC-Bayesian bounds. Some of these bounds contain no Kullback-Leibler divergence and others allow kernel functions to be used as voters (via the sample compression setting). Finally, out of the analysis, we propose the MinCq learning algorithm that basically minimizes the C-bound. MinCq reduces to a simple quadratic program. Aside from being theoretically grounded, MinCq achieves state-of-the-art performance, as shown in our extensive empirical comparison with both AdaBoost and the Support Vector Machine.","PeriodicalId":14794,"journal":{"name":"J. Mach. Learn. Res.","volume":"81 1","pages":"787-860"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"118","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Mach. Learn. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5555/2789272.2831140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 118

Abstract

We propose an extensive analysis of the behavior of majority votes in binary classification. In particular, we introduce a risk bound for majority votes, called the C-bound, that takes into account the average quality of the voters and their average disagreement. We also propose an extensive PAC-Bayesian analysis that shows how the C-bound can be estimated from various observations contained in the training data. The analysis intends to be self-contained and can be used as introductory material to PAC-Bayesian statistical learning theory. It starts from a general PAC-Bayesian perspective and ends with uncommon PAC-Bayesian bounds. Some of these bounds contain no Kullback-Leibler divergence and others allow kernel functions to be used as voters (via the sample compression setting). Finally, out of the analysis, we propose the MinCq learning algorithm that basically minimizes the C-bound. MinCq reduces to a simple quadratic program. Aside from being theoretically grounded, MinCq achieves state-of-the-art performance, as shown in our extensive empirical comparison with both AdaBoost and the Support Vector Machine.
多数投票的风险界限:从pac -贝叶斯分析到学习算法
我们提出了一个广泛的分析在二元分类多数投票的行为。特别是,我们引入了多数票的风险界限,称为c界限,它考虑了选民的平均素质和他们的平均分歧。我们还提出了一个广泛的pac -贝叶斯分析,该分析显示了如何从训练数据中包含的各种观测值中估计c界。分析打算是独立的,可以作为pac -贝叶斯统计学习理论的入门材料。它从一般的PAC-Bayesian角度出发,以不常见的PAC-Bayesian边界结束。其中一些边界不包含Kullback-Leibler散度,而其他边界允许将核函数用作投票人(通过样本压缩设置)。最后,在分析的基础上,我们提出了MinCq学习算法,该算法基本上最小化了c界。MinCq简化为一个简单的二次程序。除了理论基础之外,MinCq实现了最先进的性能,正如我们与AdaBoost和支持向量机的广泛经验比较所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信