A New Approach to Educator Preparation Evaluation: Evidence for Continuous Improvement

Corinne Donovan, J. Ashdown, Anne Mungai
{"title":"A New Approach to Educator Preparation Evaluation: Evidence for Continuous Improvement","authors":"Corinne Donovan, J. Ashdown, Anne Mungai","doi":"10.3776/JOCI.%Y.V8I1P86-110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The landscape for educator preparation has shifted to accountability models emphasizing performance assessment of teaching, employer feedback reports, newly approved accreditation standards showing impact on K-12 student learning, and expectations of public access to all of this information.  This article provides a perspective on the extent to which this change offers promise for improving educator preparation programs and consequently excellence in teaching in K-12 schools.  Two accountability reports are used as the empirical evidence for review; one is a pilot institutional feedback report from the Teacher Quality Research Center (Boyd, Lankford, & Wyckoff, 2009) and the second is a new Teacher Preparation Program report prepared by New York City’s department of education (NYCDOE, 2013).  Ultimately, a systems perspective is recommended, in which candidates, IHEs, and K-12 schools are involved in the process of how educator preparation is evaluated and how that connects to other aspects of the education profession.","PeriodicalId":31424,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction","volume":"43 1","pages":"86-110"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3776/JOCI.%Y.V8I1P86-110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The landscape for educator preparation has shifted to accountability models emphasizing performance assessment of teaching, employer feedback reports, newly approved accreditation standards showing impact on K-12 student learning, and expectations of public access to all of this information.  This article provides a perspective on the extent to which this change offers promise for improving educator preparation programs and consequently excellence in teaching in K-12 schools.  Two accountability reports are used as the empirical evidence for review; one is a pilot institutional feedback report from the Teacher Quality Research Center (Boyd, Lankford, & Wyckoff, 2009) and the second is a new Teacher Preparation Program report prepared by New York City’s department of education (NYCDOE, 2013).  Ultimately, a systems perspective is recommended, in which candidates, IHEs, and K-12 schools are involved in the process of how educator preparation is evaluated and how that connects to other aspects of the education profession.
教师准备评估的新途径:持续改进的证据
教育工作者准备工作的前景已经转向问责模式,强调教学绩效评估、雇主反馈报告、新批准的认证标准对K-12学生学习的影响,以及公众对所有这些信息的期望。这篇文章提供了一个视角,在多大程度上,这一变化提供了改善教育工作者准备计划的希望,从而使K-12学校的教学变得卓越。两份问责报告作为实证证据进行审查;一份是教师质量研究中心的试点机构反馈报告(Boyd, Lankford, & Wyckoff, 2009),另一份是纽约市教育部编写的一份新的教师准备计划报告(NYCDOE, 2013)。最后,推荐一个系统的观点,在这个观点中,候选人、高等教育学院和K-12学校参与到如何评估教育工作者准备工作的过程中,以及如何将其与教育专业的其他方面联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信