Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy on English-language Twitter

IF 2.6 4区 管理学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
M. Thelwall, K. Kousha, Saheeda Thelwall
{"title":"Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy on English-language Twitter","authors":"M. Thelwall, K. Kousha, Saheeda Thelwall","doi":"10.3145/EPI.2021.MAR.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy seems likely to increase mortality rates and delay the easing of social distancing restrictions Online platforms with large audiences may influence vaccine hesitancy by spreading fear and misinformation that is avoided by the mainstream media Understanding what types of vaccine hesitancy information is shared on the popular social web site Twitter may therefore help to design interventions to address misleading attitudes This study applies content analysis to a random sample of 446 vaccine hesitant Covid-19 tweets in English posted between 10 March and 5 December 2020 The main themes discussed were conspiracies, vaccine development speed, and vaccine safety Most (79%) of those tweeting refusal to take a vaccine expressed right-wing opinions, fear of a deep state, or conspiracy theories A substantial minority of vaccine refusers (18%) mainly tweeted non-politically about other themes The topics on Twitter reflect vaccine concerns, but those stating vaccine refusal in non-political contexts may unsettle the wider Twitter network by reaching outside right-wing areas of Twitter","PeriodicalId":20684,"journal":{"name":"Profesional De La Informacion","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"61","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Profesional De La Informacion","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3145/EPI.2021.MAR.12","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

Abstract

Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy seems likely to increase mortality rates and delay the easing of social distancing restrictions Online platforms with large audiences may influence vaccine hesitancy by spreading fear and misinformation that is avoided by the mainstream media Understanding what types of vaccine hesitancy information is shared on the popular social web site Twitter may therefore help to design interventions to address misleading attitudes This study applies content analysis to a random sample of 446 vaccine hesitant Covid-19 tweets in English posted between 10 March and 5 December 2020 The main themes discussed were conspiracies, vaccine development speed, and vaccine safety Most (79%) of those tweeting refusal to take a vaccine expressed right-wing opinions, fear of a deep state, or conspiracy theories A substantial minority of vaccine refusers (18%) mainly tweeted non-politically about other themes The topics on Twitter reflect vaccine concerns, but those stating vaccine refusal in non-political contexts may unsettle the wider Twitter network by reaching outside right-wing areas of Twitter
英语推特上对Covid-19疫苗的犹豫
拥有大量受众的在线平台可能会通过传播主流媒体避免的恐惧和错误信息来影响疫苗犹豫,因此了解流行社交网站Twitter上分享的疫苗犹豫信息类型可能有助于设计干预措施以解决误导态度讨论的主题是阴谋论、疫苗开发速度和疫苗安全。大多数(79%)拒绝接种疫苗的人表达了右翼观点、对深层政府的恐惧或阴谋论。少数拒绝接种疫苗的人(18%)主要发布非政治性的其他主题推文。但那些在非政治背景下声明拒绝接种疫苗的人可能会影响到推特右翼以外的地区,从而扰乱更广泛的推特网络
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: El profesional de la información es una revista sobre información, bibliotecas y nuevas tecnologías de la información. Primera revista española de Biblioteconomía y Documentación indexada por las dos bases de datos bibliográficas internacionales más importantes: ISI Social Science Citation Index y Scopus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信